Literature DB >> 28936605

Sex determination of a Tunisian population by CT scan analysis of the skull.

Malek Zaafrane1,2,3, Mehdi Ben Khelil4,5, Ines Naccache4,6, Ekbel Ezzedine4,6, Frédéric Savall7, Norbert Telmon7, Najla Mnif4,6, Moncef Hamdoun4,5.   

Abstract

It is widely accepted that the estimation of biological attributes in the human skeleton is more accurate when population-specific standards are applied. With the shortage of such data for contemporary North African populations, it is duly required to establish population-specific standards. We present here the first craniometric standards for sex determination of a contemporary Tunisian population. The aim of this study was to analyze the correlation between sex and metric parameters of the skull in this population using CT scan analysis and to generate proper reliable standards for sex determination of a complete or fragmented skull. The study sample comprised cranial multislice computed tomography scans of 510 individuals equally distributed by sex. ASIRTM software in a General ElectricTM workstation was used to position 37 landmarks along the volume-rendered images and the multiplanar slices, defining 27 inter-landmark distances. Frontal and parietal bone thickness was also measured for each case. The data were analyzed using basic descriptive statistics and logistic regression with cross-validation of classification results. All of the measurements were sexually dimorphic with male values being higher than female values. A nine-variable model achieved the maximum classification accuracy of 90% with -2.9% sex bias and a six-variable model yielded 85.9% sexing accuracy with -0.97% sex bias. We conclude that the skull is highly dimorphic and represents a reliable bone for sex determination in contemporary Tunisian individuals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sex characteristics; Sex determination by skeleton; Tunisia

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28936605     DOI: 10.1007/s00414-017-1688-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Legal Med        ISSN: 0937-9827            Impact factor:   2.686


  46 in total

Review 1.  Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status.

Authors:  S J Ulijaszek; D A Kerr
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.718

2.  Comparison of mandibular landmarks from computed tomography and 3D digitizer data.

Authors:  Frank L'Engle Williams; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.414

3.  Statistical basis for positive identification in forensic anthropology.

Authors:  Dawnie Wolfe Steadman; Bradley J Adams; Lyle W Konigsberg
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.868

Review 4.  New perspectives in forensic anthropology.

Authors:  Dennis C Dirkmaat; Luis L Cabo; Stephen D Ousley; Steven A Symes
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.868

5.  Kumho, Daubert, and the nature of scientific inquiry: implications for forensic anthropology.

Authors:  Christopher R Grivas; Debra A Komar
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.832

6.  The influence of senescence on craniofacial and cervical morphology in humans.

Authors:  J M Doual; J Ferri; M Laude
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Discriminant functions for sex estimation of modern Japanese skulls.

Authors:  Yoshinori Ogawa; Kazuhiko Imaizumi; Sachio Miyasaka; Mineo Yoshino
Journal:  J Forensic Leg Med       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 1.614

8.  Assessment of sex in a modern Turkish population using cranial anthropometric parameters.

Authors:  Oguzhan Ekizoglu; Elif Hocaoglu; Ercan Inci; Ismail Ozgur Can; Dilek Solmaz; Sema Aksoy; Cudi Ferat Buran; Ibrahim Sayin
Journal:  Leg Med (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 1.376

9.  The assessment and meaning of intraobserver error in population studies based on discontinuous cranial traits.

Authors:  J E Molto
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.868

10.  Craniometric analysis of the modern Cretan population.

Authors:  Elena F Kranioti; Mehmet Yasar Işcan; Manolis Michalodimitrakis
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 2.395

View more
  6 in total

1.  Machine learning approaches for sex estimation using cranial measurements.

Authors:  Diana Toneva; Silviya Nikolova; Gennady Agre; Dora Zlatareva; Vassil Hadjidekov; Nikolai Lazarov
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Sex estimation in the cranium and mandible: a multislice computed tomography (MSCT) study using anthropometric and geometric morphometry methods.

Authors:  Claudia Gillet; Leonor Costa-Mendes; Camille Rérolle; Norbert Telmon; Delphine Maret; Frédéric Savall
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Sexual dimorphism in shape and size of the neurocranium.

Authors:  Diana H Toneva; Silviya Y Nikolova; Elena D Tasheva-Terzieva; Dora K Zlatareva; Nikolai E Lazarov
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 2.791

Review 4.  Contributions of anatomy to forensic sex estimation: focus on head and neck bones.

Authors:  Thamires Mello-Gentil; Vanessa Souza-Mello
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2021-07-01

5.  Sex estimation through geometric morphometric analysis of the frontal bone: an assessment in pre-pubertal and post-pubertal modern Spanish population.

Authors:  Daniele Garcovich; Laura Albert Gasco; Alfonso Alvarado Lorenzo; Riccardo Aiuto; Milagros Adobes Martin
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  A study on sex estimation by using machine learning algorithms with parameters obtained from computerized tomography images of the cranium.

Authors:  Seyma Toy; Yusuf Secgin; Zulal Oner; Muhammed Kamil Turan; Serkan Oner; Deniz Senol
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.