Literature DB >> 14566895

Comparison of mandibular landmarks from computed tomography and 3D digitizer data.

Frank L'Engle Williams1, Joan T Richtsmeier.   

Abstract

We recorded 3D coordinates for 28 mandibular landmarks from three-dimensional reconstructions of CT axial slices using the image analysis program eTDIPS. The images were acquired from a pediatric series of human mandibles (neonate to 13 years of age) from the Bosma collection (Shapiro and Richtsmeier, 1997, Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 103:415-416). To test the accuracy of these coordinate data, we recorded the same 28 landmarks directly on the Bosma mandibles using a Polhemus 3Space digitizer. The directly digitized landmarks serve as a gold standard upon which to evaluate the eTDIPS data. Standard deviations of landmark placement using eTDIPS show a greater degree of variation compared to the data gathered using the digitizer, although this error is more heavily concentrated in certain types of landmarks. All possible linear distances between unique pairs of landmarks were calculated, and like linear distances were compared between the two data collection methods. The absolute difference for all like linear distances ranged from 0.001-3.9 mm (mean = 0.377 mm; SD = 1.136), with the eTDIPS data being consistently larger than the digitizer coordinates. This study demonstrates that landmark coordinate data can be reliably collected from digital CT images of the human mandible. We define a set of mandibular landmarks useful in evaluating the effects of craniofacial disorders, growth and other biological processes. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14566895     DOI: 10.1002/ca.10095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Anat        ISSN: 0897-3806            Impact factor:   2.414


  15 in total

1.  A knowledge-based algorithm for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images.

Authors:  Abhishek Gupta; Om Prakash Kharbanda; Viren Sardana; Rajiv Balachandran; Harish Kumar Sardana
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Measurement error of 3D cranial landmarks of an ontogenetic sample using Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Jimena Barbeito-Andrés; Marisol Anzelmo; Fernando Ventrice; Marina L Sardi
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2012-06-18

3.  Measurement error in μCT-based three-dimensional geometric morphometrics introduced by surface generation and landmark data acquisition.

Authors:  Karolin Engelkes; Jennice Helfsgott; Jörg U Hammel; Sebastian Büsse; Thomas Kleinteich; André Beerlink; Stanislav N Gorb; Alexander Haas
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Concordance of traditional osteometric and volume-rendered MSCT interlandmark cranial measurements.

Authors:  Daniel Franklin; Andrea Cardini; Ambika Flavel; Algis Kuliukas; Murray K Marks; Rob Hart; Charles Oxnard; Paul O'Higgins
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Sex determination of a Tunisian population by CT scan analysis of the skull.

Authors:  Malek Zaafrane; Mehdi Ben Khelil; Ines Naccache; Ekbel Ezzedine; Frédéric Savall; Norbert Telmon; Najla Mnif; Moncef Hamdoun
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Comparison of craniofacial phenotype in craniosynostotic rabbits treated with anti-Tgf-beta2 at suturectomy site.

Authors:  Brenda C Frazier; Mark P Mooney; H Wolfgang Losken; Tim Barbano; Amr Moursi; Michael I Siegel; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2007-12-31

7.  Automated Detection of 3D Landmarks for the Elimination of Non-Biological Variation in Geometric Morphometric Analyses.

Authors:  D Aneja; S R Vora; E D Camci; L G Shapiro; T C Cox
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Symp Comput Based Med Syst       Date:  2015-06

8.  The effect of computed tomographic scanner parameters and 3-dimensional volume rendering techniques on the accuracy of linear, angular, and volumetric measurements of the mandible.

Authors:  Brian J Whyms; Houri K Vorperian; Lindell R Gentry; Eugene M Schimek; Edward T Bersu; Moo K Chung
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2013-05

Review 9.  Clinical significance of computed tomography assessment for third molar surgery.

Authors:  Kenji Nakamori; Kei Tomihara; Makoto Noguchi
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-07-28

10.  Asymmetry assessment using cone beam CT. A Class I and Class II patient comparison.

Authors:  Matthew M Sievers; Brent E Larson; Philippe R Gaillard; Andrew Wey
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.