Literature DB >> 28935906

Resilience of the larval slipper limpet Crepidula onyx to direct and indirect-diet effects of ocean acidification.

Elizaldy A Maboloc1, Kit Yu Karen Chan2.   

Abstract

Ocean acidification (OA) is known to directly impact larval physiology and development of many marine organisms. OA also affects the nutritional quality and palatability of n class="Species">algae, which are priclass="Chemical">ncipal food sources for maclass="Chemical">ny types of placlass="Chemical">nktoclass="Chemical">nic larvae. This poteclass="Chemical">ntial iclass="Chemical">ndirect effect of OA via trophic iclass="Chemical">nteractioclass="Chemical">ns, however, has class="Chemical">not beeclass="Chemical">n fully explored. Iclass="Chemical">n this study, veligers of class="Chemical">n class="Species">Crepidula onyx were exposed to different pH levels representing the ambient (as control) and low pH values (pH 7.7 and pH 7.3) for 14 days, and were fed with Isochrysis galbana cultured at these three respective pHs. pH, diet, nor their interactions had no effect on larval mortality. Decrease in pH alone had a significant effect on growth rate and shell size. Structural changes (increased porosity) in larval shells were also observed in the low pH treatments. Interactions between acidification and reduced diet quality promoted earlier settlement. Unlike other calcifying molluscs, this population of slipper limpets introduced to Hong Kong in 1960s appeared to be resilient to OA and decreased algal nutritional value. If this robustness observed in the laboratory applies to the field, competition with native invertebrates may intensify and this non-native snail could flourish in acidified coastal ecosystems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28935906      PMCID: PMC5608699          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12253-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Anthropogenic emission of n class="Chemical">carbon dioxide (class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">CO2) to the atmosphere has been increasing and leads to the elevation of CO2 partial pressure (pCO2) in the ocean[1]. This process of ocean acidification (OA) has driven the average ocean pH to drop by 0.1 since pre-industrial times and is predicted to drive a further drop of 0.2–0.4 units by the turn of this century[1] , [2]. Continuing OA represents a major threat to a wide array of marine organisms[3]. Early life stages of marine invertebrates, especially calcifying larvae are particularly sensitive to OA[4-7]. Known effects of OA include reduced survivorship, changes in physiological processes, and decreased calcification rates[8-10]. Despite the overall negative impacts of OA, little is known about its indirect effects, including changes in ecological interactions[11]. The potential effect of OA on food abundance and quality is one example of such important yet little studied ecological interactions. Food quality and quantity are known to affect survival, growth and larval competence of several marine invertebrates[12] , [13]. It is reported that OA was shown to alter the stoichiometry of n class="Species">algae[14-16]. Iclass="Chemical">ncrease iclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">pCO2 enhances inorganic carbon uptake[17], which in turn increases the C:N ratio, and thus, decreases algal nutritional quality[14] , [18] , [19]. Elevated pCO2 can also reduce or alter the polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) composition of algae[20], where PUFAs are critical for enzyme activity, stress resistance, growth and survival for various marine organisms[21]. These OA-induced changes in algal nutritional value was shown to affect feeding preference and growth rate of the amphipod Orchestoidea tuberculata [16]. Whether this indirect, diet quality effect of OA translates to other species remains unknown. However, increased food quantity has been suggested to help ameliorate the negative impacts of increased pCO2 [2] , [22] , [23], and this effect was experimentally demonstrated in the mussel Mytilus edulis [23] and the barnacle Amphibalanus improvisus [24]. These changes in algal abundance and nutritional content under OA condition may alter the herbivore’s feeding strategies and have yet to be fully investigated[16]. Some invasive species were resilient to exposure to OA alone[25] , [26]. However, it is unclear whether the abovementioned changes in trophic interaction under future climate condition could negatively affect their ability to colonize and spread to new habitats. One such invasive species is n class="Species">Crepidula fornicata, their survivorship uclass="Chemical">nder acute exposure to high temperatures was uclass="Chemical">nchaclass="Chemical">nged regardless of reariclass="Chemical">ng class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">pCO2 levels(550, 750, 1,000 µatm)[27]. Increased pCO2 only negatively affected calcification in C. fornicata but did not affect the other physiological rates, e.g., respiration and ammonia excretion[26]. It is unclear whether its sister species,Crepidula onyx, which has invaded the South China coast[28], shares the same level of resilience. Food quality and quantity are known to affect larval development. Both n class="Species">C. fornicata aclass="Chemical">nd its sister species class="Chemical">n class="Species">C. onyx have reduced growth rates at low food concentrations[29-33]. For both Crepidula spp., short-term starvation and nutritional stress during the larval stage reduced post-metamorphic growth in juveniles[29-32]. Larval growth of C. fornicata also varied with diet quality: larvae grew faster on a diet of Isochrysis galbana, which is rich in essential fatty acids[29] , [34]. Food quality and quantity are therefore critical in shaping the rate of larval development. Global climate change and ocean acidification are expected to alter both phytoplankton abundance and nutritional quality[29], however, the interactive effects of OA and diet quality are still largely unknown. Here we exposed larvae of the slipper limpet, C. onyx, to acidified rearing conditions and/or algal diets and tested if this invasive species is robust towards OA stress and could continue to flourish in its non-native habitat.

Results

Seawater carbonate chemistry and algal C:N ratio

n class="Chemical">Seawater carbonate chemistry from the three experimeclass="Chemical">ntal trials were pooled after aclass="Chemical">n iclass="Chemical">nitial test showed class="Chemical">no sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">nt differeclass="Chemical">nces betweeclass="Chemical">n trials (class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">pCO2; Kruskal-Wallis test, H 2,42 = 0.310, p = 0.856, ΩAr; Kruskal-Wallis test, H 2,42 = 0.938, p =0.626, and ΩCa; Kruskal-Wallis test, H 2,42 = 0.931, p = 0.628). For the larval rearing bottles, pCO2 (Kruskal-Wallis test, H 2,42 = 35.880, P < 0.0001), ΩAr (Kruskal-Wallis test, H 2,42 = 35.880, P < 0.0001) and ΩCa (Kruskal-Wallis test, H 2,42 = 35.880, P < 0.0001) varied significantly between pH treatments (Table 1). Temperature between the three trials showed small and negligible (<0.2 °C) difference (Kruskal-Wallis test, H 2,42 = 12.643, p = 0.002).
Table 1

Seawater carbonate chemistry parameters throughout the experiment. Seawater total scale pH, temperature and total mean alkalinity (mean TA: 2167.55 μmol.kg−1) were used to calculate CO2 partial pressure (pCO2), aragonite and calcite saturation states (respectively ΩAr and ΩCa) for a salinity of 32.0 psu using the package seacarb for R. All the values are expressed as mean ± SD.

Larval rearingMeasuredCalculated
T (°C)pHT AT (μmol/kg) pCO2 (μatm)ΩAr ΩCa
Control pH + Control diet23.44 ± 0.13a 8.04 ± 0.022155.71 ± 48.63403 ± 19a 2.88 ± 0.10a 4.41 ± 0.15a
Medium pH + Control diet23.28 ± 0.17b 7.71 ± 0.062141.35 ± 67.07963 ± 140b 1.55 ± 0.15b 2.38 ± 0.23b
Low pH + Control diet23.33 ± 0.05b 7.38 ± 0.042164.23 ± 40.111822 ± 89c 0.95 ± 0.04c 1.46 ± 0.06c
Control pH + Medium diet23.48 ± 0.19a 7.99 ± 0.012165.19 ± 39.79455 ± 13a 2.68 ± 0.06a 4.10 ± 0.10a
Control pH + Low diet23.46 ± 0.16a 8.00 ± 0.022180.33 ± 23.75441 ± 2a 2.72 ± 0.06a 4.17 ± 0.09a
Medium pH + Medium diet23.27 ± 0.21b 7.71 ± 0.062174.60 ± 72.64979 ± 123b 1.56 ± 0.16b 2.39 ± 0.25b
Low pH + Low diet23.24 ± 0.14b 7.37 ± 0.032190.68 ± 29.082034 ± 162c 0.85 ± 0.11c 1.30 ± 0.17c

Values with different letters are significantly different from each other.

n class="Chemical">Seawater carbonate chemistry parameters throughout the experimeclass="Chemical">nt. Seaclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">water total scale pH, temperature and total mean alkalinity (mean TA: 2167.55 μmol.kg−1) were used to calculate CO2 partial pressure (pCO2), aragonite and calcite saturation states (respectively ΩAr and ΩCa) for a salinity of 32.0 psu using the package seacarb for R. All the values are expressed as mean ± SD. Values with different letters are significantly different from each other. n class="Chemical">pCO2 (Kruskal-Wallis test, H 2,51 = 44.4615, P < 0.0001), ΩAr (Kruskal-Wallis test, H 2,51 = 44.1560, P < 0.0001) aclass="Chemical">nd ΩCa (Kruskal-Wallis test, H 2,51 = 44.1560, P < 0.0001) saturatioclass="Chemical">n states also varied sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">ntly betweeclass="Chemical">n algal cultures (Table 2). Temperature betweeclass="Chemical">n algal cultures showed class="Chemical">no sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">nt differeclass="Chemical">nces (Kruskal-Wallis test, H 2,51 = 0.6865, p = 0.7095).
Table 2

Seawater carbonate chemistry parameters in the algal cultures and percent carbon and nitrogen content of Isochrysis galbana cultured at 3 different pH conditions. Seawater total scale pH, temperature and total mean alkalinity (mean TA: 2156.13 μmol.kg−1 were used to calculate CO2 partial pressure (pCO2), aragonite and calcite saturation states (respectively ΩAr and ΩCa), for a salinity of 35.0 psu using the package seacarb for R. All values are expressed as mean ± SD.

Algal cultureMeasuredCalculatedC:N ratio
T (°C)pHT AT (μmol/kg) pCO2 (μatm)ΩAr ΩCa mg C g−1 DWmg N g−1 DWC:N
Control27.64 ± 1.49a 9.15 ± 0.392172.78 ± 26.8021 ± 35a 9.90 ± 1.55a 14.41 ± 2.34a 0.03670.00438.48a
Medium pH27.42 ± 1.55a 7.74 ± 0.132154.06 ± 39.47903 ± 266b 1.99 ± 0.62b 2.99 ± 0.93b 0.04640.00499.53a
Low pH27.52 ± 1.49a 7.39 ± 0.112141.54 ± 37.302146 ± 573c 0.96 ± 0.24c 1.45 ± 0.36c 0.04900.003613.57b

Values with different letters are significantly different from each other.

n class="Chemical">Seawater carbonate chemistry parameters iclass="Chemical">n the algal cultures aclass="Chemical">nd perceclass="Chemical">nt class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">carbon and nitrogen content of Isochrysis galbana cultured at 3 different pH conditions. Seawater total scale pH, temperature and total mean alkalinity (mean TA: 2156.13 μmol.kg−1 were used to calculate CO2 partial pressure (pCO2), aragonite and calcite saturation states (respectively ΩAr and ΩCa), for a salinity of 35.0 psu using the package seacarb for R. All values are expressed as mean ± SD. Values with different letters are significantly different from each other. n class="Species">Algae reared at differeclass="Chemical">nt pH culture coclass="Chemical">nditioclass="Chemical">ns had sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">ntly differeclass="Chemical">nt C:class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">N ratios (ANOVA, F 2,3 = 69.95, p = 0.003). Post hoc test showed that C:N ratio of the low pH culture condition (13.57) was significantly different from the control (Tukey’s test, p = 0.003) and from the medium pH (Tukey’s test, p = 0.006). There was no significant difference (Tukey’s test, p = 0.196) between the control with C:N ratio of 8.48 and medium pH culture condition with 9.53 (Table 2).

pH and diet had no effect on the larval mortality and respiration rate

Larval mortality of n class="Species">C. onyx was class="Chemical">not sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">ntly affected by pH treatmeclass="Chemical">nts (p = 0.552) class="Chemical">nor diet (p = 0.272, Fig. 1, Table 3). Iclass="Chemical">n additioclass="Chemical">n, pH aclass="Chemical">nd diet iclass="Chemical">nteractioclass="Chemical">ns had class="Chemical">no effect oclass="Chemical">n mortality (p = 0.534). Respiratioclass="Chemical">n rates (class="Chemical">nmol O2 hr−1 μm BL−1) were class="Chemical">not sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">ntly affected by pH treatmeclass="Chemical">nts, diet aclass="Chemical">nd pH aclass="Chemical">nd diet iclass="Chemical">nteractioclass="Chemical">ns (Fig. S1). However, sampliclass="Chemical">ng days showed sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">nt effects oclass="Chemical">n the respiratioclass="Chemical">n rates i.e. higher class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">oxygen consumption rates in older larvae (Fig. S1).
Figure 1

Larval mortality rate of Crepidula onyx was not affected by both pH and diet treatments. Error bars represent standard deviation (n = 6).

Table 3

Results of the analysis of variance (ANOVA) for all larval traits measured in Crepidula onyx.

ParametersSource of variationd.f. F-value p-value
Mortality ratepH20.610.55
Diet21.350.27
pH x diet20.640.53
Shell lengthpH211.780.0001*
Diet20.780.47
pH x diet21.150.33
Shell areapH27.900.006*
Growth ratepH23.300.048*
Diet22.080.14
pH x diet21.140.33
SettlementpH21.840.21
Diet23.080.10
pH x diet26.580.02*
Clearance ratepH22.400.11
Diet2284.68<0.0001*
pH x diet42.260.09

*Significant results (P < 0.05).

Larval mortality rate of n class="Species">Crepidula onyx was class="Chemical">not affected by both pH aclass="Chemical">nd diet treatmeclass="Chemical">nts. Error bars represeclass="Chemical">nt staclass="Chemical">ndard deviatioclass="Chemical">n (class="Chemical">n = 6). Results of the analysis of variance (An class="Chemical">NOVA) for all larval traits measured iclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">n class="Species">Crepidula onyx. *Significant results (P < 0.05).

pH affected larval shell length, growth rate and shell integrity

Shell length (SL) on day 14 was significantly affected by pH treatments (p = 0.0001, Fig. 2a, Table 3). Post hoc test showed that larvae in the low pH treatment were significantly smaller the other two treatments (Tukey’s test, p < 0.0006). n class="Chemical">Newly settled juveclass="Chemical">niles oclass="Chemical">n day 14 had a meaclass="Chemical">n SL of 0.79 ± 0.04 mm iclass="Chemical">n the coclass="Chemical">ntrol, 0.74 ± 0.8 mm iclass="Chemical">n medium pH aclass="Chemical">nd 0.71 ± 0.06 mm iclass="Chemical">n the low pH. However, diet had class="Chemical">no sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">nt effect oclass="Chemical">n SL (p = 0.468), class="Chemical">nor did the pH aclass="Chemical">nd diet iclass="Chemical">nteractioclass="Chemical">ns (p = 0.329). Larval shell area oclass="Chemical">n day 14 also differed sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">ntly betweeclass="Chemical">n pH treatmeclass="Chemical">nts (p = 0.007), raclass="Chemical">ngiclass="Chemical">ng from 0.014 ± 0.002 mm2 iclass="Chemical">n the coclass="Chemical">ntrol pH to 0.010 ± 0.002 mm2 iclass="Chemical">n the low pH treatmeclass="Chemical">nt. Growth rate (Fig. 2b) was also sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">ntly affected by pH treatmeclass="Chemical">nts (p = 0.048) aclass="Chemical">nd growth rate iclass="Chemical">n the coclass="Chemical">ntrol was sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">ntly higher thaclass="Chemical">n those iclass="Chemical">n medium pH treatmeclass="Chemical">nts (Tukey’s test, p = 0.019). Meaclass="Chemical">n growth rate was 173.09 ± 16.60 µm log day-1 iclass="Chemical">n the coclass="Chemical">ntrol, 157. 48 ± 20.69 µm log day-1 iclass="Chemical">n the medium pH aclass="Chemical">nd 162.85 ± 18.47 µm log day-1 iclass="Chemical">n the low pH treatmeclass="Chemical">nt. Diet had class="Chemical">no sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">nt effect oclass="Chemical">n the growth rate (p = 0.139), class="Chemical">nor did the iclass="Chemical">nteractioclass="Chemical">ns betweeclass="Chemical">n pH aclass="Chemical">nd diet (p = 0.330).
Figure 2

Mean shell length at day 14 (a) and growth rate (b) of Crepidula onyx exposed to different pH levels and diets. pH had significant effects on both shell length and growth rate while diet nor the pH and diet interactions showed no significant effects. Due to uneven number of larvae measured, mean of means of shell length was used. Bar graphs with different letters are significantly different from each other. Error bars represent standard deviation (n = 6).

Mean shell length at day 14 (a) and growth rate (b) of n class="Species">Crepidula onyx exposed to differeclass="Chemical">nt pH levels aclass="Chemical">nd diets. pH had sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">nt effects oclass="Chemical">n both shell leclass="Chemical">ngth aclass="Chemical">nd growth rate while diet class="Chemical">nor the pH aclass="Chemical">nd diet iclass="Chemical">nteractioclass="Chemical">ns showed class="Chemical">no sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">nt effects. Due to uclass="Chemical">neveclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">number of larvae measured, meaclass="Chemical">n of meaclass="Chemical">ns of shell leclass="Chemical">ngth was used. Bar graphs with differeclass="Chemical">nt letters are sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">ntly differeclass="Chemical">nt from each other. Error bars represeclass="Chemical">nt staclass="Chemical">ndard deviatioclass="Chemical">n (class="Chemical">n = 6). Results from scanning electron microscopy (Fig. 3) revealed minor but noticeable structural changes in the larval shells at low pH conditions. The growing outer edge of the nacreous layers differed between pH treatments: under control pH conditions, the shell exhibited clear nacreous layers (Fig. 3a) and a defined crystallites, granulated structures (Fig. 3b); medium pH resulted in perforated nacreous layers (Fig. 3c) and slightly eroded periostracum layers (Fig. 3d), while low pH treatment led to nacreous layers with n class="Disease">pits aclass="Chemical">nd perforatioclass="Chemical">ns (Fig. 3e), aclass="Chemical">nd heavily eroded crystallite structures iclass="Chemical">n the periostracum layer (Fig. 3f).
Figure 3

Scanning electron micrographs showing the ultrastructures of day 14 Crepidula onyx shells exposed to control pH (a,b), medium pH (c,d) and low pH (e,f). Scale bars = 5 µm.

Scanning electron micrographs showing the ultrastructures of day 14 n class="Species">Crepidula onyx shells exposed to coclass="Chemical">ntrol pH (a,b), medium pH (c,d) aclass="Chemical">nd low pH (e,f). Scale bars = 5 µm.

pH and low diet quality enhanced larval settlement

The percentage of larvae settled was not affected by pH (p = 0.372) nor diet (p = 0.367) alone, but was affected by pH and diet interactions (p = 0.017). It appeared that larval settlement was enhanced with decreasing pH in combination with low diet quality (Tukey’s test, p < 0.05, Fig. 4).
Figure 4

Percent spontaneously settled larval Crepidula onyx after being exposed to different pH levels and diets for ten days. No significant difference in the number of settled larvae on day 10 between pH and diet; but significant interactions between pH and diet was observed and letters indicate the post-hoc Tukey’s test grouping. Error bars represent standard deviation (n = 6).

Percent spontaneously settled larval n class="Species">Crepidula onyx after beiclass="Chemical">ng exposed to differeclass="Chemical">nt pH levels aclass="Chemical">nd diets for teclass="Chemical">n days. class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">No significant difference in the number of settled larvae on day 10 between pH and diet; but significant interactions between pH and diet was observed and letters indicate the post-hoc Tukey’s test grouping. Error bars represent standard deviation (n = 6).

Low diet quality enhanced clearance rate

Clearance rate (CR) of n class="Species">C. onyx was class="Chemical">not sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">ntly affected by pH treatmeclass="Chemical">nts (p = 0.109) but was sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">ntly affected by diet (p < 0.0001, Fig. 5, Table 3). Clearaclass="Chemical">nce rates were sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">ntly lower iclass="Chemical">n the coclass="Chemical">ntrol diet thaclass="Chemical">n the other two lower diets (Tukey’s test, p < 0.001). However, pH aclass="Chemical">nd diet iclass="Chemical">nteractioclass="Chemical">ns had class="Chemical">no effect oclass="Chemical">n the CR (p = 0.089).
Figure 5

Larval clearance rate of Crepidula onyx estimated through incubating of known amount of larvae with known amount of algal cell for 2 hours. Significant differences in clearance rates were observed between diet qualities, with high clearance rates at low diet quality. Bar graphs with different letters are significantly different from each other. Error bars represent standard deviation (n = 4).

Larval clearance rate of n class="Species">Crepidula onyx estimated through iclass="Chemical">ncubaticlass="Chemical">ng of kclass="Chemical">nowclass="Chemical">n amouclass="Chemical">nt of larvae with kclass="Chemical">nowclass="Chemical">n amouclass="Chemical">nt of algal cell for 2 hours. Sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">nt differeclass="Chemical">nces iclass="Chemical">n clearaclass="Chemical">nce rates were observed betweeclass="Chemical">n diet qualities, with high clearaclass="Chemical">nce rates at low diet quality. Bar graphs with differeclass="Chemical">nt letters are sigclass="Chemical">nificaclass="Chemical">ntly differeclass="Chemical">nt from each other. Error bars represeclass="Chemical">nt staclass="Chemical">ndard deviatioclass="Chemical">n (class="Chemical">n = 4).

Discussions

n class="Chemical">Not oclass="Chemical">nly does oceaclass="Chemical">n acidificatioclass="Chemical">n impact larval physiology, it caclass="Chemical">n also affect larval performaclass="Chemical">nce through iclass="Chemical">ndirect iclass="Chemical">nteractioclass="Chemical">ns, iclass="Chemical">ncludiclass="Chemical">ng the chaclass="Chemical">nge iclass="Chemical">n algal-prey class="Chemical">nutritioclass="Chemical">nal value as OA reduces the class="Chemical">nutritioclass="Chemical">nal quality of mariclass="Chemical">ne class="Chemical">n class="Species">algae by elevating the C:N ratio. However, this reduction in food quality together with reduced pH (pH 7.3) did not affect the mortality and respiration rate of larval Crepidula onyx. Decrease in pH alone reduced C. onyx larval shell length, growth rate and shell structure. Low pH and low diet quality, however, appeared to promote larval settlement. Our work suggests that some species, including C. onyx, exhibit plasticity to cope with, if not are already well adapted to ocean acidification and low algal nutritional value. The decrease in pH alone had a significant effect on shell size (10% decrease), growth rate (13% decrease), and shell structures. As diet did not affect shell length and growth rate, ultrastructure changes were assumed to be an effect due to pH alone. Similarly, larval shell n class="Disease">deformities were observed iclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">n class="Species">C. fornicata at high pCO2 (1400 µatm) condition, approximately pHT 7.56[25] and in Mytilus edilus at increasing pCO2 (1,120, 2,400 and 4,000 µatm)[35]. These changes in shell structures could imply a reduced calcification rate[36] and/or increased dissolution. Future studies using radioactively labelled isotopes could help differentiate between these two processes. Reduction in biocalcification could indicate an energetic tradeoff [37] as maintaining homeostasis is energetically costly, e.g., ion transport accounted for over 80% energy expenditure in larval urchin exposed to OA conditions[38]. The ecological consequence of such tradeoff, e.g., increased vulnerability to predator[39], warrants additional studies. Despite pH effects on shell growth and morphology, larval mortality rate and respiration of n class="Species">C. onyx were class="Chemical">not affected by acidificatioclass="Chemical">n. Coclass="Chemical">ntrary to other species that showed class="Chemical">n class="Disease">metabolic depression under OA conditions, e.g., Littorina littorea [40] and Mytilus chilensis [41], C. onyx together with C. fornicata experienced little pH impact on their respiration rate. Such resilience could be attributed on several factors. These factors include: 1) pre-exposure to low pCO2 condition in their habitats and inside brood chamber. Coastal environments in Hong Kong can experience seasonal low pH as low as 7.7 pH unit[42] , [43]. Crepidula onyx brood their larvae in brood chambers for 2 to 4 weeks prior to release, and pH therein could be low, e.g., pH 7.0 in Ostrea chilensis [42] and 6.4 in the calyptraeid Crepipatella dilatata [44]; 2) presence of a large energy reserve from yolk, e.g., Gallager and Mann[45] showed that survival of bivalve larvae positively correlated with lipid content in eggs and varied between broodstock. The Hong Kong population has relatively larger egg size (mean size of 181.75 µm) compared to the populations from California (172 µm)[46] and Panama (157–159 µm)[47]. Further, starved larvae from this local population were able to settle though at significantly smaller sizes, which would suggests C. onyx larvae have relatively high energy reserve (Maboloc and Chan, pers. obs.); 3) presence of maternal transferred protein, e.g., larval oysters of Crassostrea sikamea collected from polluted sites are more resistant to trace metal stress due to maternal transferred metallothionein[48]; 4) high efficiency ion transport through energetic trade-offs and or energy re-allocation (see above discussion); 5) changes in feeding behaviors (see below); or a combination of the factors above. Low pH and low diet quality promoted larval settlement. Dooley and Pires[49] reported a similar observation for n class="Species">C. fornicata, where larvae settled aclass="Chemical">nd metamorphosed at higher frequeclass="Chemical">ncy at lower pH (pH 7.5 aclass="Chemical">nd pH 7.7) thaclass="Chemical">n the coclass="Chemical">ntrol (pH 8.0). Plasticity iclass="Chemical">n settlemeclass="Chemical">nt schedule could be aclass="Chemical">n iclass="Chemical">ndicatioclass="Chemical">n of larval stress or reductioclass="Chemical">n of eclass="Chemical">nergy reserve as postulated by the “desperate larva hypothesis”[50] , [51]. Assumiclass="Chemical">ng little to class="Chemical">no differeclass="Chemical">nce iclass="Chemical">n post-settlemeclass="Chemical">nt mortality this iclass="Chemical">ncrease iclass="Chemical">n settlemeclass="Chemical">nt will likely have a positive implicatioclass="Chemical">n oclass="Chemical">n the class="Chemical">number of iclass="Chemical">ndividuals recruiticlass="Chemical">ng to the populatioclass="Chemical">n[52]. Alterclass="Chemical">natively, these earlier settlers could also suffer higher mortality as they could be less selective agaiclass="Chemical">nst poor settlemeclass="Chemical">nt sites[50]. Together with the lack of impact oclass="Chemical">n larval mortality, OA aclass="Chemical">nd low algal class="Chemical">nutritioclass="Chemical">nal value likely have little overall impact oclass="Chemical">n the local populatioclass="Chemical">n of class="Chemical">n class="Species">C. onyx in Hong Kong. Diet quality alone has no significant effect on the larval development of n class="Species">C. onyx. Larvae could have met its metabolic requiremeclass="Chemical">nts by iclass="Chemical">ncreasiclass="Chemical">ng its feediclass="Chemical">ng iclass="Chemical">n respoclass="Chemical">nse to low food quality as the food coclass="Chemical">nceclass="Chemical">ntratioclass="Chemical">n was class="Chemical">noclass="Chemical">n-limiticlass="Chemical">ng iclass="Chemical">n this study. Results from supplemeclass="Chemical">ntary feediclass="Chemical">ng experimeclass="Chemical">nts coclass="Chemical">nducted with larvae from oclass="Chemical">ne of the females studied showed that larvae exposed to reduced pH aclass="Chemical">nd/or fed with low-pH growclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">n class="Species">algae, increased their clearance rates by three fold when compared to those in the control (Fig. 5, Table 3). Similar increase in clearance rates with the increasing pCO2 was also observed in C. fornicata [26]. Blue mussel Mytilus edulis larvae also showed high feeding rates at pH 7.35[53]. This observed increase in clearance rate could potentially incur energetic cost and affect energy allocation. However, of the small number of marine invertebrate studied, ciliary motion for both swimming (e.g., 0.5–1.5% larval energy stores hr−1 in Bugula spp.)[54] and feeding (e.g., 0.502 calories day−1 in Menippe mercenaria)[55] accounted only a small portion of their energy budget. It is however possible that under a food limiting condition, acidification-induced reduction in food quality could have negative impacts. If the high individual resilience of n class="Species">C. onyx observed iclass="Chemical">n the laboratory is realized as traclass="Chemical">nsgeclass="Chemical">neratioclass="Chemical">nal plasticity iclass="Chemical">n the field, this iclass="Chemical">nvasive species may have competitive advaclass="Chemical">ntage over the local species, which might eveclass="Chemical">ntually lead to shifts iclass="Chemical">n commuclass="Chemical">nity compositioclass="Chemical">ns uclass="Chemical">nder future oceaclass="Chemical">n coclass="Chemical">nditioclass="Chemical">ns. However, to fully uclass="Chemical">nderstaclass="Chemical">nd iclass="Chemical">nvasive dyclass="Chemical">namics of class="Chemical">n class="Species">C. onyx, further studies are needed to identify the impact of more realistic multiple stressors scenario and how long term exposure to these environmental changes affects its reproductive success, settlement and dispersal.

Materials and Methods

Adult collection and broodstock maintenance

Slipper n class="Species">limpets class="Chemical">n class="Species">Crepidula onyx were collected from Victoria Harbor, Hong Kong (22°29′N, 114°17′E). Both adults and larvae acquired were reared to sexual maturity under laboratory conditions at the Coastal Marine Laboratory, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (~7 months to first brooding). The animals were maintained in filtered (0.2 μm) seawater (pHT = 8.09 ± 0.10; T = 22 °C; S = 32; light/dark cycle: 12 h/12 h) with water changes every other day and with daily feeding of Isochrysis galbana at 4 × 105 cells ml−1. Since adult slipper limpet C. fornicata can consume and digest larvae and zooplankton[56]. To add more nutrients, C. onyx adults were supplemented with newly hatched Artemia nauplii at ~30 individual ml−1 twice a week. After ~7 months of rearing, egg capsules were being brooded and veligers were released into the water. The swimming veligers from each individual were collected immediately after their release through a 100 μm sieve and counted for use in subsequent experiments.

Experimental design, larval rearing, and seawater carbonate chemistry

To test the direct and diet-mediated indirect effects of ocean acidification on the development of n class="Species">C. onyx, the larvae were exposed to three pH levels (coclass="Chemical">ntrol pH ≈ 8.01, medium pH ≈ 7.71 aclass="Chemical">nd low pH ≈ 7.38) aclass="Chemical">nd fed with class="Chemical">n class="Species">algae cultured at different pH, hereinafter referred to as diet, which had different nutritional qualities as indicated by C:N ratio (see algal culturing). These pH levels were chosen to represent both present day extreme values in the coastal environments (pHNBS 7.7–8.2 in Hong Kong[42] , [43] and the native habitat of C. onyx where upwelling occurs (with values < pH 7.75)[57], as well as the predicted surface pH reduction of 1.4 units by 2300[58]. A total of 7 treatments was tested: namely larvae reared at control pH and fed with n class="Species">algae growclass="Chemical">n iclass="Chemical">n high, medium, aclass="Chemical">nd low pH (treatmeclass="Chemical">nts 1–3), larvae reared at medium pH fed with class="Chemical">n class="Species">algae grown in control and medium pH (treatments 4–5), and larvae reared at low pH fed with algae grown in control and low pH (treatments 6–7). There were duplicate rearing bottles for each treatment during each experimental trial. The experiment was repeated three times with larvae from different mothers. Each of the mothers was kept with two males. Larvae were reared in 1.5 l filtered sean class="Chemical">water at a declass="Chemical">nsity of 1 larva 5 ml−1 (~300 larvae per bottle) aclass="Chemical">nd maiclass="Chemical">ntaiclass="Chemical">ned at a temperature of 23 ± 2 °C. Culture bottles were cleaclass="Chemical">ned aclass="Chemical">nd class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">water was completely changed with pre-equilibrated CO2 filtered seawater on day 4, day 8, and day 12 post hatching. The experiment was terminated on day 14. Larvae were fed every day (4 × 105 cells ml−1) starting from day 0 with I. galbana cultured at 3 different pH conditions (see algal culturing).This ad libitum concentration was chosen based on Zhao et al.[33] as low food concentration alone negatively affect larval growth and development. To check if food addition can cause pH variations in the rearing bottles, pH was measured once before and after food addition. pH variations were minimal and within the experimental levels (e.g., before food addition, pH value at one low pH bottle was 7.361, after adding control food, pH value was 7.425). More importantly, all cultures were continuously aerated with a gas mixture at the experimental pCO2 level, pH deviations stabilized quickly to the set level. Each larval culture was continuously aerated and mixed through gentle air bubbling. The pH in the medium and low cultures were controlled by constant addition of a mix of compressed air and pure n class="Chemical">CO2 coclass="Chemical">ntrolled by a thermal mass flow coclass="Chemical">ntroller (GFC 17 Aalborg, class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">New York USA; ±1% FS accuracy). The pH, millivolt, and temperature of each culture bottle were monitored daily with Metrohm 826 pH meter and Unitrode (Herisau, Switzerland). Salinity was measured using a handheld refractometer. The pH was converted to the total scale (pHT) after calibration with TRIS (Tris/HCl) buffer solution with a salinity of 33.0 provided by the Dickson Lab at the Scripps Oceanographic Institute. Duplicate samples for total alkalinity (TA) were taken on day 4, day 8, day 12 and day 14 from all the cultures and from the newly filtered, pH equilibrated seawater used to refill the jars (n = 3). A computer-driven titration system (905 Titrando mounted with a glass electrode; Unitrode with Pt 1000; Herisau, Switzerland) was use to assess the TA of filtered samples (0.2 μm) with a Gran function, as described by Dickson et al.[59]. The carbonate system parameters (pCO2, ΩAr and ΩCa) were calculated from these two measurements with the R package seacarb[60] using the dissociation constants from Mehrbach et al.[61] as refitted by Dickson and Millero[62].

Algal culturing

n class="Species">Isochrysis galbana was sub-cultured from the same algal starter aclass="Chemical">nd maiclass="Chemical">ntaiclass="Chemical">ned iclass="Chemical">n f/2 medium uclass="Chemical">nder 3 differeclass="Chemical">nt pHT coclass="Chemical">nditioclass="Chemical">ns (9.15 ± 0.39 as coclass="Chemical">ntrol/regular culture method, medium pHT 7.74 ± 0.13, aclass="Chemical">nd low pHT 7.39 ± 0.11). To achieve the medium aclass="Chemical">nd low pH levels, algal cultures were bubbled with pure class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">CO2 controlled by pH-stat systems (R-WP017 CO2 Regulator, Easy-Aqua, Guangzhou, China). pH level in the control raised from the ~pH 8.0 of ambient seawater to ~ pH 9.0 as the algae photosynthesize. Cell density was determined by collecting aliquot samples (n = 3) and each were counted three times with a hemacytometer. pHT, temperature, and salinity were measured daily. Algal cultures at exponential phase (4–5 days) were used to feed the larvae. To test for differences in food quality between the cultures, 2 sub-samples of 100 ml from the 3 culture conditions were filtered onto pre-combusted Whatman GF/F glass filters and processed for carbon to nitrogen ratio (C:N) with 2400 Series II CHNS/O Elemental Analyzer (Perkin Elmer, MA, USA) following the protocol of USEPA standard method 440.0[63].

Larval development, shell growth and settlement

Larval cultures were sampled every other day starting from day 1 until day 14 (50 ml subsample × 2) to assess larval density. Samples were immediately fixed with a drop of buffered n class="Chemical">formalin solutioclass="Chemical">n (4% iclass="Chemical">n FSW at pH 8.3), veliger larvae were couclass="Chemical">nted aclass="Chemical">nd stored iclass="Chemical">n 2% buffered class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">formalin solution at 4 °C until further measurements. Water volume in each culture jar was adjusted at every water change and sampling to maintain the initial density of the culture. For each culture, survival (S) was calculated for each day as the proportion of larval density divided by the maximum number of larvae counted during the experiment. Mortality rates (MR) were computed as the coefficient of significant linear regression between survival and time (% larvae day−1, Table S1). At least five larvae (8 ± 2 larvae per sampling point and treatments) from the fixed samples were photographed under the microscope (n class="Chemical">Nikoclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">n class="Mutation">H600L, Japan) and shell length (SL) was measured with ImageJ[64]. Growth rates (GR) were calculated for each culture as the regression coefficient of the significant logarithmic relationship between measured SL and time (Table S2). A subsample from each of the cultures was also collected on day 3, day 7 and day 14 for larval respiration measurements (supplementary method). n class="Chemical">Niclass="Chemical">ne days post hatchiclass="Chemical">ng, three subsamples of 20 larvae from each of the duplicate reariclass="Chemical">ng bottles iclass="Chemical">n each treatmeclass="Chemical">nt were collected aclass="Chemical">nd placed iclass="Chemical">n six-well plates with 5 ml of respective pre-equilibrated class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">CO2 to assess spontaneous settlement (n = 6). After 24-hours, the number of larvae swimming and settled or attached were counted.

Shell integrity and larval shell area

For shell integrity and morphology, a subsample of fixed larvae from each treatment (n = 5) were collected on day 14 and rinsed three times in n class="Chemical">phosphate buffer saline, cleared through a gradieclass="Chemical">nt of class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">ethanol until 100% concentration and freeze dried. The samples were then mounted on a stub, viewed and photographed with scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM - 6390 MA, USA) at the Materials Characterization and Preparation Facility at HKUST. Larval shell area was then measured with ImageJ.

Clearance rate

Maternal half-sibling larvae from one brood were collected from the 3 different pH cultures (control pH ≈ 8.02, medium pH ≈ 7.77 and low pH ≈ 7.37). In each feeding experiment, 5 n class="Species">C. onyx larvae were placed iclass="Chemical">nto a 50 ml falcoclass="Chemical">n tube with 25 ml pre-equilibrated pH treated seaclass="Chemical">n class="Chemical">water. The larvae were acclimated for an hour before feeding and placed onto a custom made plankton rack for mixing. For each treatments, larvae were fed with 2 × 105 cells ml−1 of Isochrysis galbana cultured at 3 respective pHs. The treatments and blank procedural controls (without the larvae) were incubated for 2 hours then fixed with 4% buffered formalin. The algal concentration before and after the experiment was enumerated with a Beckman Z2 Coulter® Particle Count and Size Analyzer (California, USA). The clearance rate following the formula of Ginger et al.[65] was calculated from the decrease in the algal concentration during the 2-hour feeding period {[(ln B1 − ln B0) − (ln C1 − ln C0) V]/t}/n; B1 = blank control, initial algal concentration, B0 = blank control, final algal concentration, C1 = treatment, initial algal concentration, C0 = treatment, final algal concentration, V = 25 ml, t = 2 h, n = 5 larvae and expressed in milliliters per larva per hour (ml larva−1 h−1). There were 4 replicates per pH and diet treatment.

Data analyses

All the statistical analyses were carried out with the software Statistica 7 and significance levels of α = 5%. All data were checked for normality (Shapiro-Wilk test) and homogeneity (Levene’s test). Data from all the experiments were pooled after an initial test (Univariate test) showed no significant differences between the three experimental trials. Two-way Analyses of Variance (An class="Chemical">NOVA) were used to aclass="Chemical">nalyze effects of pH treatmeclass="Chemical">nts aclass="Chemical">nd diet oclass="Chemical">n mortality rate, growth rate, larval shell area, settlemeclass="Chemical">nt, clearaclass="Chemical">nce rate, temperature, aclass="Chemical">nd C:class="Chemical">n class="Chemical">N ratio. Three-way ANOVA was used to analyze the respiration rates (log transformed). Post-hoc Tukey tests were performed when significant differences were detected. Seawater carbonate chemistry was analyzed with the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Supplementary Material
  30 in total

1.  Scleractinian coral species survive and recover from decalcification.

Authors:  Maoz Fine; Dan Tchernov
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Experimental ocean acidification alters the allocation of metabolic energy.

Authors:  T-C Francis Pan; Scott L Applebaum; Donal T Manahan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evaluating whether velar lobe size indicates food limitation among larvae of the marine gastropod Crepidula fornicata.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Mar Bio Ecol       Date:  2000-09-20       Impact factor: 2.171

4.  Improved tolerance of metals in contaminated oyster larvae.

Authors:  Nanyan Weng; Wen-Xiong Wang
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Ocean acidification increases the vulnerability of native oysters to predation by invasive snails.

Authors:  Eric Sanford; Brian Gaylord; Annaliese Hettinger; Elizabeth A Lenz; Kirstin Meyer; Tessa M Hill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Impact of ocean acidification on energy metabolism of oyster, Crassostrea gigas--changes in metabolic pathways and thermal response.

Authors:  Gisela Lannig; Silke Eilers; Hans O Pörtner; Inna M Sokolova; Christian Bock
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 5.118

7.  Human impacts and changes in the coastal waters of south China.

Authors:  Linlin Wang; Qiang Li; Hongsheng Bi; Xian-Zhong Mao
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Evidence for upwelling of corrosive "acidified" water onto the continental shelf.

Authors:  Richard A Feely; Christopher L Sabine; J Martin Hernandez-Ayon; Debby Ianson; Burke Hales
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Biomineralization changes with food supply confer juvenile scallops (Argopecten purpuratus) resistance to ocean acidification.

Authors:  Laura Ramajo; Núria Marbà; Luis Prado; Sophie Peron; Marco A Lardies; Alejandro B Rodriguez-Navarro; Cristian A Vargas; Nelson A Lagos; Carlos M Duarte
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 10.863

10.  Does encapsulation protect embryos from the effects of ocean acidification? The example of Crepidula fornicata.

Authors:  Fanny Noisette; Thierry Comtet; Erwann Legrand; François Bordeyne; Dominique Davoult; Sophie Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Slipper snail tales: How Crepidula fornicata and Crepidula atrasolea became model molluscs.

Authors:  Deirdre C Lyons; Jonathan Q Henry
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 5.242

2.  Bioindicators of severe ocean acidification are absent from the end-Permian mass extinction.

Authors:  William J Foster; J A Hirtz; C Farrell; M Reistroffer; R J Twitchett; R C Martindale
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.