| Literature DB >> 28935232 |
Trevor S Barss1, Emily N Ainsley2, Francisca C Claveria-Gonzalez3, M John Luu2, Dylan J Miller1, Matheus J Wiest4, David F Collins5.
Abstract
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is used to produce contractions to restore movement and reduce secondary complications for individuals experiencing motor impairment. NMES is conventionally delivered through a single pair of electrodes over a muscle belly or nerve trunk using short pulse durations and frequencies between 20 and 40Hz (conventional NMES). Unfortunately, the benefits and widespread use of conventional NMES are limited by contraction fatigability, which is in large part because of the nonphysiological way that contractions are generated. This review provides a summary of approaches designed to reduce fatigability during NMES, by using physiological principles that help minimize fatigability of voluntary contractions. First, relevant principles of the recruitment and discharge of motor units (MUs) inherent to voluntary contractions and conventional NMES are introduced, and the main mechanisms of fatigability for each contraction type are briefly discussed. A variety of NMES approaches are then described that were designed to reduce fatigability by generating contractions that more closely mimic voluntary contractions. These approaches include altering stimulation parameters, to recruit MUs in their physiological order, and stimulating through multiple electrodes, to reduce MU discharge rates. Although each approach has unique advantages and disadvantages, approaches that minimize MU discharge rates hold the most promise for imminent translation into rehabilitation practice. The way that NMES is currently delivered limits its utility as a rehabilitative tool. Reducing fatigability by delivering NMES in ways that better mimic voluntary contractions holds promise for optimizing the benefits and widespread use of NMES-based programs.Entities:
Keywords: Electric stimulation; Electromyography; Fatigue Muscles; Reflex; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injuries
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28935232 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.478
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil ISSN: 0003-9993 Impact factor: 3.966