Literature DB >> 28935232

Utilizing Physiological Principles of Motor Unit Recruitment to Reduce Fatigability of Electrically-Evoked Contractions: A Narrative Review.

Trevor S Barss1, Emily N Ainsley2, Francisca C Claveria-Gonzalez3, M John Luu2, Dylan J Miller1, Matheus J Wiest4, David F Collins5.   

Abstract

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is used to produce contractions to restore movement and reduce secondary complications for individuals experiencing motor impairment. NMES is conventionally delivered through a single pair of electrodes over a muscle belly or nerve trunk using short pulse durations and frequencies between 20 and 40Hz (conventional NMES). Unfortunately, the benefits and widespread use of conventional NMES are limited by contraction fatigability, which is in large part because of the nonphysiological way that contractions are generated. This review provides a summary of approaches designed to reduce fatigability during NMES, by using physiological principles that help minimize fatigability of voluntary contractions. First, relevant principles of the recruitment and discharge of motor units (MUs) inherent to voluntary contractions and conventional NMES are introduced, and the main mechanisms of fatigability for each contraction type are briefly discussed. A variety of NMES approaches are then described that were designed to reduce fatigability by generating contractions that more closely mimic voluntary contractions. These approaches include altering stimulation parameters, to recruit MUs in their physiological order, and stimulating through multiple electrodes, to reduce MU discharge rates. Although each approach has unique advantages and disadvantages, approaches that minimize MU discharge rates hold the most promise for imminent translation into rehabilitation practice. The way that NMES is currently delivered limits its utility as a rehabilitative tool. Reducing fatigability by delivering NMES in ways that better mimic voluntary contractions holds promise for optimizing the benefits and widespread use of NMES-based programs.
Copyright © 2017 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electric stimulation; Electromyography; Fatigue Muscles; Reflex; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injuries

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28935232     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  8 in total

1.  The reaction times and symmetry indices in the bilateral trunk and limb muscles in control subjects and subjects with low back pain that persisted two months or longer.

Authors:  Paul S Sung; Eric O'Sullivan; Moon Soo Park
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Prior Involvement of Central Motor Drive Does Not Impact Performance and Neuromuscular Fatigue in a Subsequent Endurance Task.

Authors:  Fabio Giuseppe Laginestra; Alessandro Cavicchia; Jennifer E Vanegas-Lopez; Chiara Barbi; Camilla Martignon; Gaia Giuriato; Anna Pedrinolla; Markus Amann; Thomas J Hureau; Massimo Venturelli
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2022-05-25

3.  Mitigation of excessive fatigue associated with functional electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Alie J Buckmire; Tapas J Arakeri; J P Reinhard; Andrew J Fuglevand
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Does increasing the number of channels during neuromuscular electrical stimulation reduce fatigability and produce larger contractions with less discomfort?

Authors:  Trevor S Barss; Bailey W M Sallis; Dylan J Miller; David F Collins
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Electrically induced quadriceps fatigue in the contralateral leg impairs ipsilateral knee extensors performance.

Authors:  Fabio Giuseppe Laginestra; Markus Amann; Emine Kirmizi; Gaia Giuriato; Chiara Barbi; Federico Ruzzante; Anna Pedrinolla; Camilla Martignon; Cantor Tarperi; Federico Schena; Massimo Venturelli
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 6.  Usability of Functional Electrical Stimulation in Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Post-Stroke Patients: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Andreia S P Sousa; Juliana Moreira; Cláudia Silva; Inês Mesquita; Rui Macedo; Augusta Silva; Rubim Santos
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-12       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Development of a High-Power Capacity Open Source Electrical Stimulation System to Enhance Research into FES-Assisted Devices: Validation of FES Cycling.

Authors:  Tiago Coelho-Magalhães; Emerson Fachin-Martins; Andressa Silva; Christine Azevedo Coste; Henrique Resende-Martins
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Enhancing Adaptations to Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Training Interventions.

Authors:  Anthony J Blazevich; David F Collins; Guillaume Y Millet; Marco A Vaz; Nicola A Maffiuletti
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 6.230

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.