Literature DB >> 28933940

An Assessment of Primary Care and Pulmonary Provider Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening.

Matthew Triplette1, Erin K Kross1, Blake A Mann2, Joann G Elmore1, Christopher G Slatore3,4, Shahida Shahrir1, Perrin E Romine1, Paul D Frederick1, Kristina Crothers1.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Lung cancer screening has a mortality benefit to high-risk smokers, but implementation remains suboptimal. Providers represent the key entry point to screening, and an understanding of provider perspectives on lung cancer screening is necessary to improve referral and overall implementation.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to understand knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, barriers, and facilitators to screening in a diverse group of referring pulmonologists and primary care providers.
METHODS: We conducted an electronic survey of primary care and pulmonary providers within a tertiary care medical center across different practice sites. The survey covered the following domains: 1) beliefs and assessment of evidence, 2) knowledge of lung cancer screening and guidelines, 3) current screening practices, 4) barriers and facilitators, and 5) demographic and practice characteristics.
RESULTS: The 196 participants included 80% primary care clinicians and 19% pulmonologists (1% others). Forty-one percent practiced at university-based or affiliated clinics, 47% at county hospital-based clinics, and 12% at other or unidentified sites. The majority endorsed lung cancer screening effectiveness (74%); however, performance on knowledge-based assessments of screening eligibility, documentation, and nodule management was suboptimal. Key barriers included inadequate time (36%), inadequate staffing (36%), and patients having too many other illnesses to address screening (38%). Decision aids, which are used at the point of referral, were commonly identified both as important lung cancer screening clinical facilitators (51%) and as provider knowledge facilitators (59%). There were several differences by provider specialty, including primary care providers more frequently reporting time constraints and their patients having too many other illnesses to address screening as significant barriers to lung cancer screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Providers endorsed the benefits of lung cancer screening, but there are limitations in provider knowledge of key screening components. The most frequently reported barriers to screening represent a lack of clinical time or resources to address lung cancer screening in clinical practice. Facilitators for nodule management as well as point-of-care referral materials may be helpful in reducing knowledge gaps and the clinical burden of referral. These are all modifiable factors, which could be addressed to increase screening referral. Differences in attitudes and barriers by specialty should also be considered to optimize screening implementation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attitudes of health personnel; early detection of cancer; lung cancer; pulmonary nodule

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28933940      PMCID: PMC5822418          DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201705-392OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc        ISSN: 2325-6621


  26 in total

1.  Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose Computed Tomography in the United States-2010 to 2015.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Stacey A Fedewa
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  COUNTERPOINT: Should Only Primary Care Physicians Provide Shared Decision-making Services to Discuss the Risks/Benefits of a Low-Dose Chest CT Scan for Lung Cancer Screening? No.

Authors:  Charles A Powell
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Implementation planning for lung cancer screening: five major challenges.

Authors:  John K Field; Stephen W Duffy; Anand Devaraj; David R Baldwin
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 30.700

4.  High-risk community and primary care providers knowledge about and barriers to low-dose computed topography lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Vani N Simmons; Jhanelle E Gray; Matthew B Schabath; Lauren E Wilson; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 5.  Internet-based learning in the health professions: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Cook; Anthony J Levinson; Sarah Garside; Denise M Dupras; Patricia J Erwin; Victor M Montori
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Primary Care Provider and Patient Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening. A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Neeti M Kanodra; Charlene Pope; Chanita H Halbert; Gerard A Silvestri; LaShanta J Rice; Nichole T Tanner
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2016-11

7.  A National Survey of Pulmonologists' Views on Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan M Iaccarino; Jack Clark; Rendelle Bolton; Linda Kinsinger; Michael Kelley; Christopher G Slatore; David H Au; Renda Soylemez Wiener
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2015-11

Review 8.  Screening for lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Frank C Detterbeck; Peter J Mazzone; David P Naidich; Peter B Bach
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Management of Pulmonary Nodules by Community Pulmonologists: A Multicenter Observational Study.

Authors:  Nichole T Tanner; Jyoti Aggarwal; Michael K Gould; Paul Kearney; Gregory Diette; Anil Vachani; Kenneth C Fang; Gerard A Silvestri
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  27 in total

1.  The Landscape of US Lung Cancer Screening Services.

Authors:  Minal S Kale; Juan Wisnivesky; Emanuela Taioli; Bian Liu
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  What Exactly Is Shared Decision-Making? A Qualitative Study of Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Anne C Melzer; Sara E Golden; Sarah S Ono; Santanu Datta; Kristina Crothers; Christopher G Slatore
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Lung Cancer Screening in the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program: Availability and Service Organization.

Authors:  Ruth C Carlos; JoRean D Sicks; Caroline Chiles; Lucy Gansauer; Charles S Kamen; Anne E Kazak; Heather B Neuman; Joseph M Unger; Kathryn E Weaver
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Effectiveness of a Patient Education Class to Enhance Knowledge about Lung Cancer Screening: a Quality Improvement Evaluation.

Authors:  Lori C Sakoda; Melanie A Meyer; Neetu Chawla; Michael A Sanchez; Maruta A Blatchins; Sundeep Nayak; Karen San; Gary K Zin; George Minowada
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Assessment and Efficacy of Low-Dose CT Screening and Primary Care Providers Perspective on Lung Cancer Screening: An Institutional Review.

Authors:  Manan Shah; Phani K Surapaneni; Kirat Sandhu; Saba Shafi; Temidayo Abe; Sanjay Jain; Gabriela Oprea; Judith Volcy
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-03-09

6.  Outcomes of Shared Decision-Making for Low-Dose Screening for Lung Cancer in an Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Jan M Eberth; Anja Zgodic; Scott C Pelland; Stephanie Y Wang; David P Miller
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Real-world Clinical Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening-Evaluating Processes to Improve Screening Guidelines-Concordance.

Authors:  Nikki M Carroll; Andrea N Burnett-Hartman; Caroline A Joyce; William Kinnard; Eric J Harker; Virginia Hall; Julie S Steiner; Erica Blum-Barnett; Debra P Ritzwoller
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Attitudes of Clinicians about Screening Head and Neck Cancer Survivors for Lung Cancer Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Kimberly Dukes; Aaron T Seaman; Richard M Hoffman; Alan J Christensen; Nicholas Kendell; Andrew L Sussman; Miriam Vélez-Bermúdez; Robert J Volk; Nitin A Pagedar
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 1.547

9.  National Lung Cancer Screening Utilization Trends in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Jennifer A Lewis; Lauren R Samuels; Jason Denton; Gretchen C Edwards; Michael E Matheny; Amelia Maiga; Christopher G Slatore; Eric Grogan; Jane Kim; Robert H Sherrier; Robert S Dittus; Pierre P Massion; Laura Keohane; Sayeh Nikpay; Christianne L Roumie
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2020-06-13

10.  Screening for Lung Cancer: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Gerard A Silvestri; Lesley H Souter; Tanner J Caverly; Jeffrey P Kanne; Hormuzd A Katki; Renda Soylemez Wiener; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 9.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.