Kimberly Dukes1, Aaron T Seaman2, Richard M Hoffman2,3, Alan J Christensen3,4, Nicholas Kendell5, Andrew L Sussman6, Miriam Vélez-Bermúdez4, Robert J Volk7, Nitin A Pagedar3,5. 1. Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. 2. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA. 3. Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. 4. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. 5. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA. 6. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA. 7. Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: National guidelines recommend lung cancer screening (LCS) using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for high-risk patients, including survivors of other tobacco-related cancers like head and neck cancer (HNC). This qualitative study investigated clinicians' practices and attitudes toward LCS with LDCT with patients who have survived HNC, in the context of mandated requirements for shared decision making (SDM) using decision aids. METHODS: Thematic analysis of transcribed semi-structured clinician interviews and focus group. RESULTS: Clinicians recognized LCS' utility for some HNC survivors with smoking histories. However, they identified many challenges to SDM in diverse clinic settings, including time, workflow, uncertainty about guidelines and reimbursement, decision aids, competing patient priorities, unclear evidence, potentially heightened patient receptivity and stress, and the complexity of discussions. They also identified challenges to LCS implementation. CONCLUSIONS: While clinicians feel that LDCT LCS may benefit some HNC survivors, there are barriers both to implementing LCS SDM for these patients in primary care as currently recommended and to integrating it into cancer clinics. Challenges for SDM across settings include a lack of decision aids tailored to patients with cancer histories. Given recommendations to broaden LCS eligibility criteria, more research may be required before refinement of current guidelines.
OBJECTIVE: National guidelines recommend lung cancer screening (LCS) using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for high-risk patients, including survivors of other tobacco-related cancers like head and neck cancer (HNC). This qualitative study investigated clinicians' practices and attitudes toward LCS with LDCT with patients who have survived HNC, in the context of mandated requirements for shared decision making (SDM) using decision aids. METHODS: Thematic analysis of transcribed semi-structured clinician interviews and focus group. RESULTS: Clinicians recognized LCS' utility for some HNC survivors with smoking histories. However, they identified many challenges to SDM in diverse clinic settings, including time, workflow, uncertainty about guidelines and reimbursement, decision aids, competing patient priorities, unclear evidence, potentially heightened patient receptivity and stress, and the complexity of discussions. They also identified challenges to LCS implementation. CONCLUSIONS: While clinicians feel that LDCT LCS may benefit some HNC survivors, there are barriers both to implementing LCS SDM for these patients in primary care as currently recommended and to integrating it into cancer clinics. Challenges for SDM across settings include a lack of decision aids tailored to patients with cancer histories. Given recommendations to broaden LCS eligibility criteria, more research may be required before refinement of current guidelines.
Entities:
Keywords:
decision making; early detection of cancer; head and neck neoplasms; lung neoplasms; qualitative research; shared
Authors: Vani N Simmons; Jhanelle E Gray; Matthew B Schabath; Lauren E Wilson; Gwendolyn P Quinn Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Renda Soylemez Wiener; Elisa Koppelman; Rendelle Bolton; Karen E Lasser; Belinda Borrelli; David H Au; Christopher G Slatore; Jack A Clark; Hasmeena Kathuria Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-02-21 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Kristina Crothers; Erin K Kross; Lisa M Reisch; Shahida Shahrir; Christopher Slatore; Steven B Zeliadt; Matthew Triplette; Rafael Meza; Joann G Elmore Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2016-11
Authors: Steven B Zeliadt; Jaimee L Heffner; George Sayre; Deborah E Klein; Carol Simons; Jennifer Williams; Lynn F Reinke; David H Au Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Neeti M Kanodra; Charlene Pope; Chanita H Halbert; Gerard A Silvestri; LaShanta J Rice; Nichole T Tanner Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2016-11
Authors: Robert J Volk; Suzanne K Linder; Viola B Leal; Vance Rabius; Paul M Cinciripini; Geetanjali R Kamath; Reginald F Munden; Therese B Bevers Journal: Prev Med Date: 2014-02-08 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Richard M Hoffman; Andrew L Sussman; Christina M Getrich; Robert L Rhyne; Richard E Crowell; Kathryn L Taylor; Ellen J Reifler; Pamela H Wescott; Ambroshia M Murrietta; Ali I Saeed; Shiraz I Mishra Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 2.830