Literature DB >> 31409114

Attitudes of Clinicians about Screening Head and Neck Cancer Survivors for Lung Cancer Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography.

Kimberly Dukes1, Aaron T Seaman2, Richard M Hoffman2,3, Alan J Christensen3,4, Nicholas Kendell5, Andrew L Sussman6, Miriam Vélez-Bermúdez4, Robert J Volk7, Nitin A Pagedar3,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: National guidelines recommend lung cancer screening (LCS) using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for high-risk patients, including survivors of other tobacco-related cancers like head and neck cancer (HNC). This qualitative study investigated clinicians' practices and attitudes toward LCS with LDCT with patients who have survived HNC, in the context of mandated requirements for shared decision making (SDM) using decision aids.
METHODS: Thematic analysis of transcribed semi-structured clinician interviews and focus group.
RESULTS: Clinicians recognized LCS' utility for some HNC survivors with smoking histories. However, they identified many challenges to SDM in diverse clinic settings, including time, workflow, uncertainty about guidelines and reimbursement, decision aids, competing patient priorities, unclear evidence, potentially heightened patient receptivity and stress, and the complexity of discussions. They also identified challenges to LCS implementation.
CONCLUSIONS: While clinicians feel that LDCT LCS may benefit some HNC survivors, there are barriers both to implementing LCS SDM for these patients in primary care as currently recommended and to integrating it into cancer clinics. Challenges for SDM across settings include a lack of decision aids tailored to patients with cancer histories. Given recommendations to broaden LCS eligibility criteria, more research may be required before refinement of current guidelines.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision making; early detection of cancer; head and neck neoplasms; lung neoplasms; qualitative research; shared

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31409114      PMCID: PMC6945809          DOI: 10.1177/0003489419868245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  20 in total

1.  High-risk community and primary care providers knowledge about and barriers to low-dose computed topography lung cancer screening.

Authors:  Vani N Simmons; Jhanelle E Gray; Matthew B Schabath; Lauren E Wilson; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 5.705

2.  Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Shared Decision-making in Early Adopting Lung Cancer Screening Programs: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Renda Soylemez Wiener; Elisa Koppelman; Rendelle Bolton; Karen E Lasser; Belinda Borrelli; David H Au; Christopher G Slatore; Jack A Clark; Hasmeena Kathuria
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Impact of a Lung Cancer Screening Counseling and Shared Decision-Making Visit.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Amanda Tenenbaum; Meredith Seeley; Hilary Petersen; Christina Lyon; Xiaozhen Han; Xiao-Feng Wang
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Second Primary Lung Cancer After Head and Neck Cancer: Implications for Screening Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Nitin A Pagedar; Asitha Jayawardena; Mary E Charlton; Henry T Hoffman
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  Attitudes About Lung Cancer Screening: Primary Care Providers Versus Specialists.

Authors:  Sritha Rajupet; Dhvani Doshi; Juan P Wisnivesky; Jenny J Lin
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 4.785

6.  Patients' Attitudes Regarding Lung Cancer Screening and Decision Aids. A Survey and Focus Group Study.

Authors:  Kristina Crothers; Erin K Kross; Lisa M Reisch; Shahida Shahrir; Christopher Slatore; Steven B Zeliadt; Matthew Triplette; Rafael Meza; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2016-11

7.  Attitudes and Perceptions About Smoking Cessation in the Context of Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Steven B Zeliadt; Jaimee L Heffner; George Sayre; Deborah E Klein; Carol Simons; Jennifer Williams; Lynn F Reinke; David H Au
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Primary Care Provider and Patient Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening. A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Neeti M Kanodra; Charlene Pope; Chanita H Halbert; Gerard A Silvestri; LaShanta J Rice; Nichole T Tanner
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2016-11

9.  Feasibility of a patient decision aid about lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography.

Authors:  Robert J Volk; Suzanne K Linder; Viola B Leal; Vance Rabius; Paul M Cinciripini; Geetanjali R Kamath; Reginald F Munden; Therese B Bevers
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 4.018

10.  Attitudes and Beliefs of Primary Care Providers in New Mexico About Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Andrew L Sussman; Christina M Getrich; Robert L Rhyne; Richard E Crowell; Kathryn L Taylor; Ellen J Reifler; Pamela H Wescott; Ambroshia M Murrietta; Ali I Saeed; Shiraz I Mishra
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  1 in total

1.  Lung Cancer Screening Knowledge and Perceived Barriers Among Physicians in the United States.

Authors:  Karthik J Kota; Stephanie Ji; Michelle T Bover-Manderski; Cristine D Delnevo; Michael B Steinberg
Journal:  JTO Clin Res Rep       Date:  2022-04-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.