Literature DB >> 27676369

Primary Care Provider and Patient Perspectives on Lung Cancer Screening. A Qualitative Study.

Neeti M Kanodra1, Charlene Pope2,3, Chanita H Halbert4,3, Gerard A Silvestri1, LaShanta J Rice4, Nichole T Tanner1,3.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends annual low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer screening in high-risk individuals. Preventive healthcare is provided predominantly by primary care providers (PCPs). Successful implementation of a screening program requires acceptance and participation by both providers and patients, with available collaboration with pulmonologists.
OBJECTIVES: To identify perceptions of and perspectives on lung cancer screening and implementation among PCPs and eligible veteran patients at high risk for lung cancer.
METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study using grounded theory in which 28 veterans and 13 PCPs completed a questionnaire and participated in focus groups. Sessions were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed with NVivo 10 software. Counts and percentages were used to report questionnaire results.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: While 58% percent of providers were aware of lung cancer screening guidelines, many could not recall the exact patient eligibility criteria. Most patients were willing to undergo LDCT screening and identified smoking as a risk factor for lung cancer, but they did not recall their PCP explaining the reason for the testing. All providers assessed smoking behavior, but only 23% referred active smokers for formal cessation services. Patients volunteered information regarding their hurdles with smoking cessation while discussing risk factors for cancer. PCPs cited time constraints as a reason for lack of appropriate counseling and shared decision making. Both parties were willing to explore modalities and decision aid tools to improve shared decision making; however, while patients were interested in individual risk prediction, few PCPs believed statistical approaches to counseling would confuse patients.
CONCLUSIONS: While patients and providers are receptive to LDCT screening, efforts are needed to improve guideline knowledge and adherence among providers. System-level interventions are necessary to facilitate time and resources for shared decision making and smoking cessation counseling and treatment. Further research is needed to identify optimal strategies for effective lung cancer screening in the community.

Entities:  

Keywords:  early detection of cancer; lung neoplasms; shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27676369     DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201604-286OC

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc        ISSN: 2325-6621


  38 in total

1.  The complicated 'Yes': Decision-making processes and receptivity to lung cancer screening among head and neck cancer survivors.

Authors:  Aaron T Seaman; Kimberly Dukes; Richard M Hoffman; Alan J Christensen; Nicholas Kendell; Andrew L Sussman; Miriam Veléz-Bermúdez; Robert J Volk; Nitin A Pagedar
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2018-04-22

2.  Understanding lung cancer screening behaviour using path analysis.

Authors:  Lisa Carter-Harris; James E Slaven; Patrick O Monahan; Claire Burke Draucker; Emilee Vode; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.136

3.  Potential Impact of Cessation Interventions at the Point of Lung Cancer Screening on Lung Cancer and Overall Mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Pianpian Cao; Jihyoun Jeon; David T Levy; Jinani C Jayasekera; Christopher J Cadham; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Kathryn L Taylor; Rafael Meza
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2020-03-08       Impact factor: 15.609

4.  Examining Lung Cancer Screening Behaviors in the Primary Care Setting: A Mixed Methods Approach.

Authors:  Alvie Ahsan; Eva Zimmerman; Elisa Marie Rodriguez; Christy Widman; Deborah Oates Erwin; Frances Georgette Saad-Harfouche; Martin Christopher Mahoney
Journal:  J Cancer Treat Res       Date:  2019-03-11

5.  What Exactly Is Shared Decision-Making? A Qualitative Study of Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Anne C Melzer; Sara E Golden; Sarah S Ono; Santanu Datta; Kristina Crothers; Christopher G Slatore
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Shared Decision-making in Early Adopting Lung Cancer Screening Programs: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Renda Soylemez Wiener; Elisa Koppelman; Rendelle Bolton; Karen E Lasser; Belinda Borrelli; David H Au; Christopher G Slatore; Jack A Clark; Hasmeena Kathuria
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Shared decision-making conversations and smoking cessation interventions: critical components of low-dose CT lung cancer screening programs.

Authors:  Lisa M Lowenstein; Gary M R Deyter; Shawn Nishi; Tianhao Wang; Robert J Volk
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-06

8.  Effectiveness of a Patient Education Class to Enhance Knowledge about Lung Cancer Screening: a Quality Improvement Evaluation.

Authors:  Lori C Sakoda; Melanie A Meyer; Neetu Chawla; Michael A Sanchez; Maruta A Blatchins; Sundeep Nayak; Karen San; Gary K Zin; George Minowada
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  Focus Groups and In-depth Interviews to Guide the Development of Lung Cancer Screening Informational Materials.

Authors:  Anushree Sharma; Richard O'Connor; Paula Celestino; Samantha Killion; Laurie Griswold-Krupski; Maansi Bansal-Travers
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Barriers to and Interest in Lung Cancer Screening Among Latino and Non-Latino Current and Former Smokers.

Authors:  Sanja Percac-Lima; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Steven J Atlas; Nancy A Rigotti; Efren J Flores; Salome Kuchukhidze; Elyse R Park
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2019-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.