Yamile Molina1, Sage J Kim2, Nerida Berrios2, Anne Elizabeth Glassgow3, Yazmin San Miguel4, Julie S Darnell5, Heather Pauls6, Ganga Vijayasiri7, Richard B Warnecke7, Elizabeth A Calhoun2,8. 1. 1 School of Public Health, Cancer Center, Center for Research on Women and Gender, University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago, Illinois. 2. 2 School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago, Illinois. 3. 3 College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago, Illinois. 4. 4 Department of Epidemiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego State University , San Diego, California. 5. 5 Health Sciences Division, Loyola University , Chicago, Illinois. 6. 6 College of Nursing, University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago, Illinois. 7. 7 Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago , Chicago, Illinois. 8. 8 University of Arizona , Tucson, Arizona.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Past efforts to assess patient navigation on cancer screening utilization have focused on one-time uptake, which may not be sufficient in the long term. This is partially due to limited resources for in-person, longitudinal patient navigation. We examine the effectiveness of a low-intensity phone- and mail-based navigation on multiple screening episodes with a focus on screening uptake after receiving noncancerous results during a previous screening episode. METHODS: The is a secondary analysis of patients who participated in a randomized controlled patient navigation trial in Chicago. Participants include women referred for a screening mammogram, aged 50-74 years, and with a history of benign/normal screening results. Navigation services focused on identification of barriers and intervention via shared decision-making processes. A multivariable logistic regression intent-to-treat model was used to examine differences in odds of obtaining a screening mammogram within 2 years of the initial mammogram (yes/no) between navigated and non-navigated women. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore patterns across subsets of participants (e.g., navigated women successfully contacted before the initial appointment; women receiving care at Hospital C). RESULTS: The final sample included 2,536 women (741 navigated, 1,795 non-navigated). Navigated women exhibited greater odds of obtaining subsequent screenings relative to women in the standard care group in adjusted models and analyses including women who received navigation before the initial appointment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that low-intensity navigation services can improve follow-up screening among women who receive a noncancerous result. Further investigation is needed to confirm navigation's impacts on longitudinal screening.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Past efforts to assess patient navigation on cancer screening utilization have focused on one-time uptake, which may not be sufficient in the long term. This is partially due to limited resources for in-person, longitudinal patient navigation. We examine the effectiveness of a low-intensity phone- and mail-based navigation on multiple screening episodes with a focus on screening uptake after receiving noncancerous results during a previous screening episode. METHODS: The is a secondary analysis of patients who participated in a randomized controlled patient navigation trial in Chicago. Participants include women referred for a screening mammogram, aged 50-74 years, and with a history of benign/normal screening results. Navigation services focused on identification of barriers and intervention via shared decision-making processes. A multivariable logistic regression intent-to-treat model was used to examine differences in odds of obtaining a screening mammogram within 2 years of the initial mammogram (yes/no) between navigated and non-navigated women. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore patterns across subsets of participants (e.g., navigated women successfully contacted before the initial appointment; women receiving care at Hospital C). RESULTS: The final sample included 2,536 women (741 navigated, 1,795 non-navigated). Navigated women exhibited greater odds of obtaining subsequent screenings relative to women in the standard care group in adjusted models and analyses including women who received navigation before the initial appointment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that low-intensity navigation services can improve follow-up screening among women who receive a noncancerous result. Further investigation is needed to confirm navigation's impacts on longitudinal screening.
Entities:
Keywords:
breast health; cancer; navigation; quasi-experimental; repeat screening
Authors: Beth A Jones; Amy Dailey; Lisa Calvocoressi; Kam Reams; Stanislav V Kasl; Carol Lee; Helen Hsu Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Kristen J Wells; Tracy A Battaglia; Donald J Dudley; Roland Garcia; Amanda Greene; Elizabeth Calhoun; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Electra D Paskett; Peter C Raich Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Peter C Raich; Elizabeth M Whitley; William Thorland; Patricia Valverde; Diane Fairclough Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Naomi Y Ko; Julie S Darnell; Elizabeth Calhoun; Karen M Freund; Kristin J Wells; Charles L Shapiro; Donald J Dudley; Steven R Patierno; Kevin Fiscella; Peter Raich; Tracy A Battaglia Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-07-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Vida Henderson; Shaila M Strayhorn; Nyahne Q Bergeron; Desmona C Strahan; Pamela S Ganschow; Aditya S Khanna; Karriem Watson; Kent Hoskins; Yamile Molina Journal: Cancer Control Date: 2022 Jan-Dec Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Beti Thompson; Sarah D Hohl; Yamile Molina; Electra D Paskett; James L Fisher; Ryan D Baltic; Chasity M Washington Journal: Curr Breast Cancer Rep Date: 2018-08-29