Literature DB >> 28933653

Patient Navigation Improves Subsequent Breast Cancer Screening After a Noncancerous Result: Evidence from the Patient Navigation in Medically Underserved Areas Study.

Yamile Molina1, Sage J Kim2, Nerida Berrios2, Anne Elizabeth Glassgow3, Yazmin San Miguel4, Julie S Darnell5, Heather Pauls6, Ganga Vijayasiri7, Richard B Warnecke7, Elizabeth A Calhoun2,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Past efforts to assess patient navigation on cancer screening utilization have focused on one-time uptake, which may not be sufficient in the long term. This is partially due to limited resources for in-person, longitudinal patient navigation. We examine the effectiveness of a low-intensity phone- and mail-based navigation on multiple screening episodes with a focus on screening uptake after receiving noncancerous results during a previous screening episode.
METHODS: The is a secondary analysis of patients who participated in a randomized controlled patient navigation trial in Chicago. Participants include women referred for a screening mammogram, aged 50-74 years, and with a history of benign/normal screening results. Navigation services focused on identification of barriers and intervention via shared decision-making processes. A multivariable logistic regression intent-to-treat model was used to examine differences in odds of obtaining a screening mammogram within 2 years of the initial mammogram (yes/no) between navigated and non-navigated women. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore patterns across subsets of participants (e.g., navigated women successfully contacted before the initial appointment; women receiving care at Hospital C).
RESULTS: The final sample included 2,536 women (741 navigated, 1,795 non-navigated). Navigated women exhibited greater odds of obtaining subsequent screenings relative to women in the standard care group in adjusted models and analyses including women who received navigation before the initial appointment.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that low-intensity navigation services can improve follow-up screening among women who receive a noncancerous result. Further investigation is needed to confirm navigation's impacts on longitudinal screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast health; cancer; navigation; quasi-experimental; repeat screening

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28933653      PMCID: PMC5865251          DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  24 in total

1.  Inadequate follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms: findings from the race differences in screening mammography process study (United States).

Authors:  Beth A Jones; Amy Dailey; Lisa Calvocoressi; Kam Reams; Stanislav V Kasl; Carol Lee; Helen Hsu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 2.  Patient navigation in breast cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Robinson-White; Brenna Conroy; Kathleen H Slavish; Margaret Rosenzweig
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.592

3.  Patient navigator programs, cancer disparities, and the patient protection and affordable care act.

Authors:  Beverly Moy; Bruce A Chabner
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011

4.  Patient navigation for underserved patients diagnosed with breast cancer.

Authors:  Aparna Raj; Naomi Ko; Tracy A Battaglia; Bruce A Chabner; Beverly Moy
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-07-02

Review 5.  Patient navigation: state of the art or is it science?

Authors:  Kristen J Wells; Tracy A Battaglia; Donald J Dudley; Roland Garcia; Amanda Greene; Elizabeth Calhoun; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Electra D Paskett; Peter C Raich
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Patient navigation improves cancer diagnostic resolution: an individually randomized clinical trial in an underserved population.

Authors:  Peter C Raich; Elizabeth M Whitley; William Thorland; Patricia Valverde; Diane Fairclough
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Can patient navigation improve receipt of recommended breast cancer care? Evidence from the National Patient Navigation Research Program.

Authors:  Naomi Y Ko; Julie S Darnell; Elizabeth Calhoun; Karen M Freund; Kristin J Wells; Charles L Shapiro; Donald J Dudley; Steven R Patierno; Kevin Fiscella; Peter Raich; Tracy A Battaglia
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Authors:  Peter C Gøtzsche; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-04

10.  Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial.

Authors:  Anthony B Miller; Claus Wall; Cornelia J Baines; Ping Sun; Teresa To; Steven A Narod
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-02-11
View more
  5 in total

1.  Prostate Cancer: Community Education and Disparities in Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Bradley Carthon; Hannah C Sibold; Shannon Blee; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-03-22

2.  Healthcare Predictors of Information Dissemination About Genetic Risks.

Authors:  Vida Henderson; Shaila M Strayhorn; Nyahne Q Bergeron; Desmona C Strahan; Pamela S Ganschow; Aditya S Khanna; Karriem Watson; Kent Hoskins; Yamile Molina
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.339

3.  Leveraging system sciences methods in clinical trial evaluation: An example concerning African American women diagnosed with breast cancer via the Patient Navigation in Medically Underserved Areas study.

Authors:  Yamilé Molina; Aditya Khanna; Karriem S Watson; Dana Villines; Nyahne Bergeron; Shaila Strayhorn; Desmona Strahan; Abigail Skwara; Michael Cronin; Prashanthinie Mohan; Surrey Walton; Tianxiu Wang; John A Schneider; Elizabeth A Calhoun
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2019-07-19

4.  Community health workers involvement in preventative care in primary healthcare: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Nila Sharma; Elizabeth Harris; Jane Lloyd; Sabuj Kanti Mistry; Mark Harris
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Breast Cancer Disparities Among Women in Underserved Communities in the USA.

Authors:  Beti Thompson; Sarah D Hohl; Yamile Molina; Electra D Paskett; James L Fisher; Ryan D Baltic; Chasity M Washington
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2018-08-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.