| Literature DB >> 28930168 |
Kandasamy Sowndhararajan1, Ponnuvel Deepa2, Minju Kim3, Se Jin Park4, Songmun Kim5,6.
Abstract
A number of Angelica species have been used in traditional systems of medicine to treat many ailments. Especially, essential oils (EOs) from the Angelica species have been used for the treatment of various health problems, including malaria, gynecological diseases, fever, anemia, and arthritis. EOs are complex mixtures of low molecular weight compounds, especially terpenoids and their oxygenated compounds. These components deliver specific fragrance and biological properties to essential oils. In this review, we summarized the chemical composition and biological activities of EOs from different species of Angelica. For this purpose, a literature search was carried out to obtain information about the EOs of Angelica species and their bioactivities from electronic databases such as PubMed, Science Direct, Wiley, Springer, ACS, Google, and other journal publications. There has been a lot of variation in the EO composition among different Angelica species. EOs from Angelica species were reported for different kinds of biological activities, such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, immunotoxic, and insecticidal activities. The present review is an attempt to consolidate the available data for different Angelica species on the basis of major constituents in the EOs and their biological activities.Entities:
Keywords: Angelica; bioactivity; essential oil; hydrodistillation; steam distillation
Year: 2017 PMID: 28930168 PMCID: PMC5620520 DOI: 10.3390/scipharm85030033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Pharm ISSN: 0036-8709
The isolation of essential oils and extracts from different Angelica species, and their major components.
| S. No. | Species | Parts | Extraction Method; Extraction Time; Yield | Place of Collection | Major Components | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seeds (fruits) from three habitats | Hydrodistillation; 2 h; 0.8–1.4% | Svencionys, Prienai and Vilnius districts in Lithunia | β-phellandrene (33.6–63.4%) and α-pinene (4.2–12.8%) | [ | |
| Fruit of two chemotypes | Steam distillation; 5 h; 0.17–0.51% | Reykjavik, Iceland | α-pinene (41.4%, 28.9%, 14.4%), bicyclogermacrene (10.1%), and β-phellandrene (37.8% and 55.2%) | [ | ||
| Root (1–2, 3–4 and >5 mm) | Hydrodistillation; 30 min | Rome, Italy | α-pinene (23.89–32.69%) and δ-3-carene (3.41–17.07%) | [ | ||
| Root (3 habitats) | Hydrodistillation; 2 h; 0.2–0.5% | Svencionys, Prienai and Vilnius districts in Lithuania | α-pinene (15.7–20.8%), δ-3-carene (15.4–16.9%), limonene (8.0–9.2%), β-phellandrene (13.5–15.4%), α-phellandrene (8.0–9.1%), and
| [ | ||
| Root (3 different altitudes) | Hydrodistillation; 3 h; 0.28–0.35% | Uttarakashi, Rudraprayag and Pothiwasa in Uttarakhand, India | dillapiole (35.93–91.55%) and nothoapiole (0.14–62.81%) | [ | ||
| Root | Hydrodistillation; 2 h; 0.9% | Urbino, Italy | α-pinene (21.3%), δ-3-carene (16.5%), limonene (16.4%), and α-phellandrene (8.7%) | [ | ||
| 2 | Leaves, petiole and root | Hydrodistillation; 3 h; 0.44% | Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA | Leaves: ligustilide (11.61%) and butylidene phthalide (7.29%) | [ | |
| Root | Solvent free solid injector; injection time—5 min and pre-heating time—7 min) | Yeosu Province, Republic of Korea | butylidene phthalide (17.82%), furfural (13.67%), 2-furanmethanol (11.97%), 5-methyl furfural (8.50%), maltol (7.28%), and butylidene dihydro-phthalide (5.78%) | [ | ||
| Root, stem and leaves | Steam distillation; 5 h; 0.05 (root), 0.06 (stem), and 0.12 (leaves) | Nantou, Taiwan | 3n-butyl phthalide (30.8–37.9%), γ-terpinene (21.1–27.2%), | [ | ||
| Headspace-solid phase microextraction; 20 min | Nantou, Taiwan | γ-terpinene (41.2–52.1%),
| [ | |||
| 3 | Whole plant | Hydrodistillation; 3 h, 0.17% | Jammu and Kashmir, Pakistan | α-phellandrene (18.0%), β-pinene (14.0%), | [ | |
| Aerial parts | Hydrodistillation; 3 h; 0.12% | Khillanmarg areas of Kashmir, India | α-phellandrene (13.5%), | [ | ||
| Root | Hydrodistillation; 5 h; 0.3% and 1.8% | Himalayan locations of Uttarakhand, India | [ | |||
| 4 | Leaves, petiole and root | Hydrodistillation; 3 h; 0.18% | Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA | Leaves: nonane (10.75%), α-pinene (33.07%), and germacrene (10.05%) | [ | |
| Root | Hydrodistillation; 4 h | Yeosu Province, Republic of Korea | nonane (19.99%), α-pinene (44.31%), camphene (6.66%), and δ-limonene (6.26%) | [ | ||
| Solvent-free solid injector; injection time—5 min and pre-heating time—7 min) | Yeosu Province, Republic of Korea | decursin (29.34%), decursinol angelate (16.83%), lomatin (10.25%), and marmesin (9.33%) | [ | |||
| Simultaneous steam distillation (n-pentane/diethyl ether); 2 h; 0.31% | Gwangju, Republic of Korea | α-pinene (30.89%), 2,4,6-trimethyl heptane (13.39%), α-limonene (4.29%), and camphene (4.10%) | [ | |||
| Steam distillation; 1 h 30 min; 0.31% | Pyeongchang, Republic of Korea | α-pinene (28.64%), β-eudesmol (14.80%), nonane (8.49%), and γ-eudesmol (5.97%) | [ | |||
| Supercritical CO2 extraction; 1 h; 1.67% | Pyeongchang, Republic of Korea | decursin (40.13%), decursinol angelate (28.44%), and β-eudesmol (7.84%) | [ | |||
| 5 | Root | Hydrodistillation; 8 h; 0.3% | Gansu Province, China | [ | ||
| Solvent free solid injector; injection time—5 min and pre-heating time—7 min) | Yeosu Province, Republic of Korea | butylidene dihydro-phthalide, (15.23%), butylidene phthalide (14.27%), furfural (16%), camphene (10.66%), and 4-pyridinol (7.17%) | [ | |||
| Steam distillation; 3 h; 0.02% | Chiang Mai province, Thailand | 3- | [ | |||
| 6 | Root | Steam distillation; 0.28% | Jinbu, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea | sabinene (31.85%), m-cresol (4.46%), α-pinene (4.00%), and α-bisabolol (3.63%) | [ | |
| 7 | Root | Supercritical CO2 extraction; 2 h; 1.8% | Jilin, China | dodecyl alcohol (13.71%), elemene (7.54%), hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester (7.32%), 1-pentadecanol (6.08%), and α-pinene (6.25%), | [ | |
| Hydrodistillation; 3 h; 0.45% | Beijing, China | α-pinene (46.3%), sabinene (9.3%), myrcene (5.5%), 1-dodecanol (5.2%), and terpinen-4-ol (4.9%). | [ | |||
| 8 | Root | Hydrodistillation; 2 h | Balkan mountains, Serbia | Liquid and headspace injection modes: β-phellandrene (54.9% and 60.1%), α-pinene (14.5% and 20.1%), and α-phellandrene (4.5% and 4.3%). | [ | |
| 9 | Root | Hydrodistillation; 3 h; 0.65% | Beijing, China | α-pinene (37.6%), | [ | |
| 10 | Stem | Hydrodistillation; 3 h; 0.2% | Uremia, Province West Azerbaijan, Iran | Stem: α-cadinol (9.24%), (epi)-α-cadinol (5.76%), and δ-cadenine (6.11%) | [ | |
| 11 | Leaves | Hydrodistillation; 3 h; 0.18% | Uremia, Province West Azerbaijan, Iran | Leaves: α-cadinol (20.2%), hexahydrofarnesyl acetone (10.03%), 1-dodecanol (7.55%), linoleic acid (6.37%) and oleic acid (5.34%) | [ | |
| 12 | Aerial parts | Steam distillation; 2 h; 0.2% | Shkotovskii District, Primorsky Krai, Russia | caryophyllene oxide (61.7%) and 3,4-dimethyl-3-cyclohexan-1-carboxaldehdye (5.8%) | [ | |
| 13 | Aerial parts | Steam distillation; 2 h; 0.2% | Shkotovskii District, Primorsky Krai, Russia | α-pinene (67.2%), sabinene (5.8%) and β-pinene (4.9%) | [ |
Biological activities of essential oils from different Angelica species.
| S. No. | Species | Parts | Biological activity | Model | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seeds | Antioxidant | Aldehyde/Carboxylic Acid Assay, DPPH radical scavenging assay, and Malonaldehyde/Gas Chromatography Assay | [ | |
| Fruit of two chemotypes | Cytotoxic effect | Human pancreas cancer cell line PANC-1 and the mouse breast cancer cell line Crl | [ | ||
| Root | Anti-seizure | Maximal electroshock and pentylenetetrazol-induced seizures in mice | [ | ||
| Anti-aflatoxigenic and antioxidant activities | [ | ||||
| Antimicrobial | [ | ||||
| 2 | Root | Nicotine | Repeated nicotine-induced locomotor activity and extracellular dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens of rats | [ | |
| Human EEG | Increased absolute low beta (left temporal and left parietal) activity | [ | |||
| Leaves | Immunotoxicity | Larvae of | [ | ||
| 3 | Whole plant | Antioxidant, antimicrobial, and phytotoxic | Bacteria: | [ | |
| Broncho-relaxant | Airway was induced using histamine aerosol in guinea pigs and ovalbumin aerosol in albino mice. | [ | |||
| 4 | Root | Anti-inflammatory | Carrageenan-induced rats | [ | |
| Antioxidant | DPPH, ABTS scavenging, and β-carotene bleaching assays. | [ | |||
| Anti-inflammatory | Carrageenan-induced rats and mechanism by plasma metabolomics approach | [ | |||
| Antibacterial | [ | ||||
| Anti-inflammatory | Carrageenan-induced acute inflammation model rats | [ | |||
| Anti-inflammatory | Lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation rat model | [ | |||
| Anxiolytic | Elevated plus-maze, light/dark and stress-induced hyperthermia tests | [ | |||
| Social interaction test of anxiety and the hole-board test | [ | ||||
| Repellent | Against | [ | |||
| 5 | Root | Antifungal and antioxidant | [ | ||
| 6 | Root | Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulating properties | Xylene-induced acute ear swelling and carrageenan-induced acute paw edema in mice; anti-inflammatory and immunomodulating properties in Freund’s complete adjuvant (FCA)-induced arthritis in rats. | [ | |
| Enhance sensitivity of MCF-7/ADR breast cancer cells to doxorubicin | MDR human breast cancer MCF-7/ADR cells | [ | |||
| Insecticidal | Yellow fever mosquito,
| [ | |||
| Antibacterial | [ | ||||
| Immunotoxicity | Larvae of | [ | |||
| 7 | Root | Antifungal and Insecticidal | [ | ||
| 8 | Leaves | Immunotoxicity | Larvae of | [ | |
| 9 | Root | Penetration Enhancers for Transdermal Administration of Ibuprofen | Therapeutic efficacy of ibuprofen with essential oil was evaluated using dysmenorrheal model mice | [ | |
| Skin permeation of drugs | Skin permeation of ibuprofen across rat abdominal skin | [ |
DPPH: 1,1-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl; ABTS: 2,2-azino-bis(3ethylbenzo-thiazoline-6-sulfonic acid); EEG: electroencephalographic activity; MDR: multidrug resistance.
Figure 1The chemical structure of some major essential oil components from Angelica species.