| Literature DB >> 28399694 |
Qiudong Jiang1,2, Yeming Wu1,2, Hui Zhang2, Pei Liu1, Junhong Yao2, Peijun Yao2, Jun Chen1,2, Jinao Duan1.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Essential oils (EOs) have shown the potential to reversibly overcome the stratum corneum (SC) barrier to enhance the skin permeation of drugs.Entities:
Keywords: ATR-FTIR; Transdermal; chuanxiong oil; ibuprofen
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28399694 PMCID: PMC7011944 DOI: 10.1080/13880209.2017.1312464
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharm Biol ISSN: 1388-0209 Impact factor: 3.503
Figure 1.Solubility of ibuprofen with the presence of different EOs (n = 3). Note: vehicle = propylene glycol (PG): isopropyl alcohol (IPA) (3:7, v/v).
Effect of 3% w/v EO on SC/vehicle partition coefficients of ibuprofen (n = 3).
| EO | Partition coefficient | Ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Vehicle | 0.41 ± 0.06 | 1.00 |
| Azone | 0.51 ± 0.06 | 1.24 |
| Turpentine oil | 0.72 ± 0.01 | 1.76 |
| 0.51 ± 0.09 | 1.24 | |
| Chuanxiong oil | 0.75 ± 0.01 | 1.83 |
| 0.68 ± 0.09 | 1.66 | |
| Cinnamon oil | 0.80 ± 0.12 | 1.95 |
| Clove oil | 0.98 ± 0.07 | 2.39 |
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001 vs. the vehicle group.
Ratio = (partition coefficient with 3% w/v EO treatment)/(partition coefficient with vehicle treatment).
Figure 2.Permeation profiles of ibuprofen with 3% w/v EOs through excised rat skin (n = 5).
The percutaneous permeation parameters of ibuprofen with various EOs through excised rat skin (n = 5).
| PE | Flux/μg·cm−2·h−1 | ER | Tlag/h | Permeation ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vehicle | 9.94 ± 3.36 | 1.00 | 7.49 ± 0.37 | 47.09 ± 11.90 |
| Azone | 19.49 ± 2.66 | 1.77 | 7.28 ± 0.93 | 56.22 ± 12.56 |
| Turpentine oil | 24.54 ± 7.90 | 2.23 | 6.16 ± 0.70 | 68.80 ± 17.16 |
| 20.22 ± 5.29 | 1.83 | 7.57 ± 0.27 | 79.43 ± 5.36 | |
| Chuanxiong oil | 28.61 ± 7.66 | 2.60 | 7.94 ± 0.29 | 88.41 ± 4.12 |
| 27.37 ± 7.07 | 2.49 | 7.03 ± 0.73 | 70.72 ± 15.57 | |
| Cinnamon oil | 28.93 ± 7.21 | 2.63 | 7.78 ± 0.56 | 81.08 ± 2.09 |
| Clove oil | 21.64 ± 8.00 | 1.97 | 7.52 ± 0.53 | 71.24 ± 15.85 |
Cumulative amount of permeated ibuprofen at 48 h/added ibuprofen*100%.
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001 vs. the vehicle group,
p < 0.05 vs. the Azone group.
Figure 3.ATR-FTIR absorption spectra of rat skin treated with 3% w/v EOs.
Peak positions of SC lipids after treated with 3%EOs (n = 3).
| Peak position of lipid (cm−1) | The shift of peak position (Δcm−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PE | Asymmetric C-H stretching | Symmetric C-H stretching | Asymmetric C-H stretching | Symmetric C-H stretching | Total of the decrease |
| Blank | 2917.05 ± 1.15 | 2849.58 ± 0.31 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vehicle | 2919.83 ± 0.76 | 2850.14 ± 2.28 | 2.83 | 0.56 | 3.39 |
| Azone | 2925.17 ± 2.03 | 2851.23 ± 0.52 | 8.12 | 1.65 | 9.77 |
| Turpentine oil | 2923.23 ± 1.28 | 2850.33 ± 1.24 | 6.18 | 0.75 | 6.93 |
| 2921.72 ± 2.72 | 2849.80 ± 1.99 | 4.67 | 0.22 | 4.89 | |
| Chuanxiong oil | 2923.94 ± 2.76 | 2851.28 ± 0.20 | 6.89 | 1.70 | 8.59 |
| 2921.98 ± 1.02 | 2851.04 ± 0.24 | 4.93 | 1.46 | 6.39 | |
| Cinnamon oil | 2922.86 ± 2.76 | 2851.58 ± 1.48 | 5.81 | 2.00 | 7.81 |
| Clove oil | 2920.75 ± 0.24 | 2850.87 ± 1.51 | 3.70 | 1.29 | 4.99 |
Shift in peak position compared to the untreated skin treated (Blank).
Peak areas of SC lipids after treated with different EOs (n = 3).
| Peak area | The decrease of peak area | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PE | Asymmetric C-H stretching | Symmetric C-H stretching | Asymmetric C-H stretching | Symmetric C-H stretching | Total of the decrease |
| Blank | 84.12 ± 1.94 | 33.47 ± 3.14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Vehicle | 81.77 ± 0.97 | 36.99 ± 0.62 | −2.35 | 3.52 | 1.17 |
| Azone | 61.39 ± 5.14 | 25.38 ± 9.64 | −22.73 | −8.09 | −30.82 |
| Turpentine oil | 33.72 ± 4.65 | 15.77 ± 7.00 | −50.40 | −17.70 | −68.10 |
| 40.61 ± 0.56 | 15.11 ± 2.00 | −43.51 | −18.36 | −80.23 | |
| Chuanxiong oil | 38.58 ± 7.98 | 12.96 ± 4.12 | −45.54 | −20.51 | −66.05 |
| 44.41 ± 0.77 | 14.74 ± 3.34 | −39.71 | −18.73 | −58.44 | |
| Cinnamon oil | 28.60 ± 3.81 | 8.89 ± 0.97 | −55.52 | −24.58 | −80.1 |
| Clove oil | 33.09 ± 12.33 | 10.33 ± 0.44 | −51.03 | −23.14 | −74.07 |
Decrease in peak area = peak area of EO treatment–peak area of blank.
Figure 4.The relationship between ER values and the total of the shift of peak position (A) or the total decrease of peak area (B) after EOs treatment.
Figure 5.Effect of EOs with different concentrations on HaCaT keratinocyte cell viability in vitro (n = 6).