Literature DB >> 28923844

Red flag screening for low back pain: nothing to see here, move along: a narrative review.

Chad E Cook1,2, Steven Z George2,3, Michael P Reiman2,4.   

Abstract

Screening for red flags in individuals with low back pain (LBP) has been a historical hallmark of musculoskeletal management. Red flag screening is endorsed by most LBP clinical practice guidelines, despite a lack of support for their diagnostic capacity. We share four major reasons why red flag screening is not consistent with best practice in LBP management: (1) clinicians do not actually screen for red flags, they manage the findings; (2) red flag symptomology negates the utility of clinical findings; (3) the tests lack the negative likelihood ratio to serve as a screen; and (4) clinical practice guidelines do not include specific processes that aid decision-making. Based on these findings, we propose that clinicians consider: (1) the importance of watchful waiting; (2) the value-based care does not support clinical examination driven by red flag symptoms; and (3) the recognition that red flag symptoms may have a stronger relationship with prognosis than diagnosis. © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  low back pain; orthopaedic; red flags; screening

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28923844     DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  8 in total

Review 1.  Higher order thinking about differential diagnosis.

Authors:  Chad E Cook; Simon Décary
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  [Remote management of musculoskeletal pain : A pragmatic approach to the implementation of video and phone consultations in musculoskeletal practice. German version].

Authors:  David Hohenschurz-Schmidt; Whitney Scott; Charlie Park; Georgios Christopoulos; Steven Vogel; Jerry Draper-Rodi
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 1.629

3.  Use of Radiography for New Patients Presenting to a Chiropractic Teaching Clinic: A Cross-sectional Analysis.

Authors:  Sheng Hui Kioh; Tamara Gien Pooke; Siew Vern Chong
Journal:  J Chiropr Humanit       Date:  2021-12-22

4.  Safety netting; best practice in the face of uncertainty.

Authors:  Sue Greenhalgh; Laura M Finucane; Christopher Mercer; James Selfe
Journal:  Musculoskelet Sci Pract       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 2.520

5.  An unusual presentation of acute myocardial infarction in physiotherapy direct access: findings from a case report.

Authors:  Lorenzo Storari; Valerio Barbari; Fabrizio Brindisino; Marco Testa; Maselli Filippo
Journal:  Arch Physiother       Date:  2021-02-15

6.  Remote management of musculoskeletal pain: a pragmatic approach to the implementation of video and phone consultations in musculoskeletal practice.

Authors:  David Hohenschurz-Schmidt; Whitney Scott; Charlie Park; Georgios Christopoulos; Steven Vogel; Jerry Draper-Rodi
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2020-12-15

7.  Primary Care Physical Therapists' Experiences When Screening for Serious Pathologies Among Their Patients: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Cecilie Rud Budtz; Helle Rønn-Smidt; Janus Nikolaj Laust Thomsen; Rikke Pilegaard Hansen; David Høyrup Christiansen
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2022-05-05

Review 8.  Red flags for the early detection of spinal infection in back pain patients.

Authors:  Mohamed Yusuf; Laura Finucane; James Selfe
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.