Chad E Cook1, Simon Décary2. 1. Division of Physical Therapy, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: chad.cook@duke.edu. 2. Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Faculty of Medicine, Québec, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Differential diagnosis is a systematic process used to identify the proper diagnosis from a set of possible competing diagnoses. METHODS: The goal of this masterclass is to discuss the higher order thinking components of differential diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: For healthcare providers, diagnosis is one of many necessary components during the clinical decision making process and it is hallmarked by differentiation of competing structures for a definitive understanding of the underlying condition. The diagnostic process involves identifying or determining the etiology of a disease or condition through evaluation of patient history, physical examination, and review of laboratory data or diagnostic imaging; and the subsequent descriptive title of that finding. Whereas differential diagnosis is a varied skill set among all healthcare providers, the concept of a diagnosis is equally germane, regardless of one's background. In theory, a diagnosis improves the use of classification tools, improves clarity and communication, provides a trajectory of treatment, improves understanding of a person's prognosis, and in some cases, may be useful for preventative treatments. To achieve these improvements, one must have an understanding of relation of the clinical utility of tests and measures with diagnosis, and how to best implement these findings in clinical practice. This requires a deeper understanding (higher order thinking) of the role of diagnosis in the management of patients.
BACKGROUND: Differential diagnosis is a systematic process used to identify the proper diagnosis from a set of possible competing diagnoses. METHODS: The goal of this masterclass is to discuss the higher order thinking components of differential diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: For healthcare providers, diagnosis is one of many necessary components during the clinical decision making process and it is hallmarked by differentiation of competing structures for a definitive understanding of the underlying condition. The diagnostic process involves identifying or determining the etiology of a disease or condition through evaluation of patient history, physical examination, and review of laboratory data or diagnostic imaging; and the subsequent descriptive title of that finding. Whereas differential diagnosis is a varied skill set among all healthcare providers, the concept of a diagnosis is equally germane, regardless of one's background. In theory, a diagnosis improves the use of classification tools, improves clarity and communication, provides a trajectory of treatment, improves understanding of a person's prognosis, and in some cases, may be useful for preventative treatments. To achieve these improvements, one must have an understanding of relation of the clinical utility of tests and measures with diagnosis, and how to best implement these findings in clinical practice. This requires a deeper understanding (higher order thinking) of the role of diagnosis in the management of patients.
Authors: Jonathan M Frank; Joshua D Harris; Brandon J Erickson; William Slikker; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Michael J Salata; Shane J Nho Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: W Brinjikji; F E Diehn; J G Jarvik; C M Carr; D F Kallmes; M H Murad; P H Luetmer Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-09-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Lisa C Carlesso; Neil A Segal; Laura Frey-Law; Yuqing Zhang; Lu Na; Michael Nevitt; Core E Lewis; Tuhina Neogi Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Penny F Whiting; Anne W S Rutjes; Marie E Westwood; Susan Mallett; Jonathan J Deeks; Johannes B Reitsma; Mariska M G Leeflang; Jonathan A C Sterne; Patrick M M Bossuyt Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-10-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: James Selfe; Jessie Janssen; Michael Callaghan; Erik Witvrouw; Chris Sutton; Jim Richards; Maria Stokes; Denis Martin; John Dixon; Russell Hogarth; Vasilios Baltzopoulos; Elizabeth Ritchie; Nigel Arden; Paola Dey Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2016-02-01 Impact factor: 13.800