| Literature DB >> 32455434 |
Jessica Y Chen1, Alan Le1,1,1, Joseph Caprioli1,1, JoAnn A Giaconi1,1, Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi1,1, Simon K Law1,1,1, Laura Bonelli1,1, Anne L Coleman1,1,1, Joseph L Demer1,1,1,1.
Abstract
Purpose: Topical prostaglandin analogs (PGAs) are common treatment for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) but reportedly may cause adnexal fat atrophy. We asked if patients with POAG treated with PGAs have abnormalities in orbital fat volume (OFV).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32455434 PMCID: PMC7405708 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.61.5.46
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ISSN: 0146-0404 Impact factor: 4.799
Figure 1.Quasicoronal MRI in the mid-portion of a representative right orbit, whose bony walls are outlined in green. Intraorbital structures including extraocular muscles, ON, and blood vessels, are outlined in white and shaded blue. Orbital fat represents the remaining orbital area excluding structures shaded in blue.
Figure 2.Axial MRI of representative orbit in pseudophakic subject, with contiguous 2 mm thick image planes arranged from inferior at mid-globe at left, to superior at right with the plane including the trochlea. GONJ, globe-optic nerve junction; IOL, intraocular lens.
Figure 3.Horizontal width of each quasicoronal image was sampled 15 times (red lines) at uniformly-spaced vertical intervals spanning the middle 60% of the vertical extend of the orbit (white arrow). These measurements were averaged to compute orbital width in each image plane.
Figure 4.Bland-Altman plot of agreement between two independent observers measuring OV in all subjects. Abscissa plots the averages of each pair of measurements, and ordinate the differences within these pairs.
Figure 5.Orbital fat volume (OFV) (A) OFV in controls and patients with POAG without abnormally elevated IOP who were treated with topical PGAs. While total OFV from apex to trochlea in POAG was significantly less in patients than controls (left paired columns), the difference was driven by the posterior orbit from apex to the GONJ (middle paired columns). In the anterior orbit from the GONJ to the trochlea (right paired columns), OFV was similar in the two groups. (B) Total orbital volume (OV) of patients with POAG was significantly less than in controls. SD, standard deviation; N.S., not significant.
Figure 6.Anteroposterior dimensions of the orbit and position of the GONJ, did not differ between patients with POAG and the controls. N.S., not significant.
Figure 7.Quasicoronal MRI just posterior to the GONJ illustrating that the orbit of a typical patient with POAG is horizontally narrower that than of a representative control.
Figure 8.Mean cross-sectional area of the orbit along its anteroposterior extent in patients with POAG and controls. Except at the extreme ends of the orbit, cross-sectional area was significantly less in POAG than in controls. Differences between groups were significant at P < 0.0001 by ANOVA. SD, standard deviation.
Figure 9.Mean orbital dimensions along the anteroposterior extent of the orbit in patients with POAG and controls. (A) Width. (B) Height. Differences between groups were significant at P < 0.0001 by ANOVA. SD, standard deviation.