Literature DB >> 28919407

How to target inter-regional phase synchronization with dual-site Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.

Guilherme Bicalho Saturnino1, Kristoffer Hougaard Madsen2, Hartwig Roman Siebner3, Axel Thielscher4.   

Abstract

Large-scale synchronization of neural oscillations is a key mechanism for functional information exchange among brain areas. Dual-site Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (ds-TACS) has been recently introduced as non-invasive technique to manipulate the temporal phase relationship of local oscillations in two connected cortical areas. While the frequency of ds-TACS is matched, the phase of stimulation is either identical (in-phase stimulation) or opposite (anti-phase stimulation) in the two cortical target areas. In-phase stimulation is thought to synchronize the endogenous oscillations and hereby to improve behavioral performance. Conversely, anti-phase stimulation is thought to desynchronize neural oscillations in the two areas, which is expected to decrease performance. Critically, in- and anti-phase ds-TACS should only differ with respect to temporal phase, while all other stimulation parameters such as focality and stimulation intensity should be matched to enable an unambiguous interpretation of the behavioral effects. Using electric field simulations based on a realistic head geometry, we tested how well this goal has been met in studies, which have employed ds-TACS up to now. Separating the induced electrical fields in their spatial and temporal components, we investigated how the chosen electrode montages determined the spatial field distribution and the generation of phase variations in the injected electric fields. Considering the basic physical mechanisms, we derived recommendations for an optimized stimulation montage. The latter allows for a principled design of in- and anti-phase ds-TACS conditions with matched spatial distributions of the electric field. This knowledge will help cognitive neuroscientists to design optimal ds-TACS configurations, which are suited to probe unambiguously the causal contribution of phase coupling to specific cognitive processes in the human brain.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dual-site Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation; Electric field simulations; Focality; Neural oscillations

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28919407     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  17 in total

1.  Selective modulation of interhemispheric connectivity by transcranial alternating current stimulation influences binaural integration.

Authors:  Basil C Preisig; Lars Riecke; Matthias J Sjerps; Anne Kösem; Benjamin R Kop; Bob Bramson; Peter Hagoort; Alexis Hervais-Adelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Current challenges: the ups and downs of tACS.

Authors:  Nicholas S Bland; Martin V Sale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perception of Rhythmic Speech Is Modulated by Focal Bilateral Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.

Authors:  Benedikt Zoefel; Isobella Allard; Megha Anil; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The critical role of phase difference in theta oscillation between bilateral parietal cortices for visuospatial working memory.

Authors:  Philip Tseng; Kai-Chi Iu; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Bilateral 5 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation on fronto-temporal areas modulates resting-state EEG.

Authors:  Aurora D'Atri; Claudia Romano; Maurizio Gorgoni; Serena Scarpelli; Valentina Alfonsi; Michele Ferrara; Fabio Ferlazzo; Paolo Maria Rossini; Luigi De Gennaro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Non-invasive Brain Stimulation: A Paradigm Shift in Understanding Brain Oscillations.

Authors:  Johannes Vosskuhl; Daniel Strüber; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Can transcranial electric stimulation with multiple electrodes reach deep targets?

Authors:  Yu Huang; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  Recent Trends in the Use of Electrical Neuromodulation in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  John-Stuart Brittain; Hayriye Cagnan
Journal:  Curr Behav Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-04-24

9.  Individually customized transcranial temporal interference stimulation for focused modulation of deep brain structures: a simulation study with different head models.

Authors:  Sangjun Lee; Chany Lee; Jimin Park; Chang-Hwan Im
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  No Differential Effects of Two Different Alpha-Band Electrical Stimulation Protocols Over Fronto-Parietal Regions on Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Martine R van Schouwenburg; Lynn K A Sörensen; Raza de Klerk; Leon C Reteig; Heleen A Slagter
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.