Literature DB >> 28917606

Argus-T Sling in 182 Male Patients: Short-term Results of a Multicenter Study.

Salvatore Siracusano1, Francesco Visalli2, Michele Favro3, Carlo Tallarigo4, Mauro Saccomanni4, Alexander Kugler5, Alberto Diminutto6, Renato Talamini2, Walter Artibani6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short-term results with Argus-T sling in patients with post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 182 patients with PPI were treated with Argus-T sling at 5 urologic centers from June 2008 to March 2013. The preoperative evaluation included medical history, pad count (1-2 pads: mild PPI; 3-5 pads: moderate PPI; >5 pads: severe PPI), visual analog scale on continence, quality of life score scale, physical examination, cystoscopy, and urodynamic evaluation. Postoperative evaluation was performed 6 weeks postoperatively, and late follow-up was achieved in April 2013. We considered a successful result when patients were cured (0-1 pads/24 hours) and or improved (1-2 pads/24 hours or a reduction in pad per day usage greater than 50%).
RESULTS: Twenty-one (11.8%), 96 (52.7%), and 65 (35.7%) patients have mild, moderate, and severe incontinence, respectively. At the median follow-up of 22 months, the overall success rate was 86.2%. We obtained successful results of 95% in mild incontinence, 78% in moderate incontinence and 70% in severe incontinence. In cured and improved patients, we observed a statistically significant amelioration of quality of life (P <.0001). Sling regulation was carried out in 42.9% of cases, whereas its removal occurred in 9.3% of cases. Postoperative complications were reported in 14.3% of patients. In patients with previous radiotherapy, we observed a successful result in 61.2% of cases.
CONCLUSION: This study represents the first report that shows short-term results of Argus-T positioning in a large population. Argus-T seems to offer good outcomes in patients with mild and moderate PPI.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28917606     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  4 in total

Review 1.  [Alloplastic material in the treatment of urinary incontinence].

Authors:  M Grabbert; R M Bauer
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Incontinence after radical prostatectomy : Male Sling or "best option" first?]

Authors:  J F Gerhard; M S Aragona; R Olianas
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Adjustable sling for the treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laercio Antonio da Silva; Rogério Simonetti; Edina Mariko Koga da Silva
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-09-23

4.  Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Postradical Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence - Is It the Best Option?

Authors:  Yun-Sok Ha; Eun Sang Yoo
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 2.835

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.