Literature DB >> 28917008

Peritoneal dialysis catheter function and survival are not adversely affected by obesity regardless of the operative technique used.

Monika A Krezalek1, Nicolas Bonamici2, Kristine Kuchta2, Brittany Lapin2, JoAnn Carbray2, Woody Denham2, John Linn2, Michael Ujiki2, Stephen P Haggerty3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity has been considered a relative contraindication to peritoneal dialysis (PD). Surprisingly, PD catheter dysfunction rates and longevity have not been studied in the growing obese ESRD population. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of patient weight on PD catheter survival in the three insertion technique categories of advanced laparoscopy (AL), basic laparoscopy (BL), and open.
METHODS: We examine retrospectively collected data on 231 consecutive PD catheter insertions at the NorthShore University HealthSystem between 2004 and 2014. Three cohorts were created based on the catheter insertion technique: open, BL using selective adhesiolysis, and AL using rectus sheath tunnel, selective omentopexy, and adhesiolysis. Primary outcomes included catheter dysfunction and catheter dysfunction-free survival for each cohort by BMI: normal weight (18.5-24.9), overweight (25-29.9), obese (≥30). Nominal variables were compared using Chi-square test, continuous variables using ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests, and catheter survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test. Statistical significance was established at 0.05.
RESULTS: For the three BMI categories, there were no statistically significant differences in patient demographics. There were no statistically significant differences in catheter dysfunction or peri-operative complications by BMI category among all patients. This was also true in the AL cohort. Among all patients, similar 2-year dysfunction-free catheter survival was noted for normal weight, overweight, and obese patients (log-rank p = 0.79). This was also true across all insertion techniques: open (log-rank p = 0.87), BL (log-rank p = 0.41), AL (log-rank p = 0.43). In the obese cohort, the 2-year dysfunction-free catheter survival was 91.1% in AL, 83.5% in BL, and 65.7% in open (log-rank p = 0.58).
CONCLUSION: Obesity does not increase complications or shorten dysfunction-free PD catheter survival regardless of the operative technique used. Obesity should not be considered as a relative contraindication to PD catheter placement as it confers similar technique success to normal- and overweight individuals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced laparoscopic insertion technique; Obesity; Omentopexy; Peritoneal dialysis; Peritoneal dialysis catheter dysfunction; Rectus sheath tunnel

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28917008     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5852-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  33 in total

1.  Feasibility of adequate solute clearance in obese patients on peritoneal dialysis: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yugo Shibagaki; Mark D Faber; George Divine; Anupkumar Shetty
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 2.  Peritoneal dialysis and preservation of residual renal function.

Authors:  Paul Tam
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Large body mass index does not predict short-term survival in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Nabeel Aslam; Judith Bernardini; Linda Fried; Beth Piraino
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  The effect of body weight on CAPD related infections and catheter loss.

Authors:  B Piraino; J Bernardini; P K Centa; J R Johnston; M I Sorkin
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.756

5.  Is obesity a favorable prognostic factor in peritoneal dialysis patients?

Authors:  D W Johnson; K A Herzig; D M Purdie; W Chang; A M Brown; R J Rigby; S B Campbell; D L Nicol; C M Hawley
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

6.  Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion using rectus sheath tunnel and selective omentopexy significantly reduces catheter dysfunction and increases peritoneal dialysis longevity.

Authors:  Monika A Krezalek; Nicolas Bonamici; Brittany Lapin; JoAnn Carbray; Jose Velasco; Woody Denham; John Linn; Michael Ujiki; Stephen P Haggerty
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Obesity is a risk factor for peritonitis in the Australian and New Zealand peritoneal dialysis patient populations.

Authors:  Stephen P McDonald; John F Collins; Markus Rumpsfeld; David W Johnson
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Weight limitations for weekly urea clearances using various exchange volumes in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  K D Nolph; R A Jensen; R Khanna; Z J Twardowski
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Predictors of peritonitis and the impact of peritonitis on clinical outcomes of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients in Taiwan--10 years' experience in a single center.

Authors:  Yao-Peng Hsieh; Chia-Chu Chang; Yao-Ko Wen; Ping-Fang Chiu; Yu Yang
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  The association between body mass index and mortality in incident dialysis patients.

Authors:  Sunil V Badve; Sanjoy K Paul; Kerenaftali Klein; Philip A Clayton; Carmel M Hawley; Fiona G Brown; Neil Boudville; Kevan R Polkinghorne; Stephen P McDonald; David W Johnson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  8 in total

1.  The ideal position of the peritoneal dialysis catheter is not always ideal.

Authors:  Tatiana Tanasiychuk; Rafael Selgas; Daniel Kushnir; Muhammad Abd Elhalim; Alon Antebi; Gloria Del Peso; Maria A Bajo; Victor Frajewicki
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Factors Associated With Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Complications in ESRD.

Authors:  José L Hernández-Castillo; Joana Balderas-Juárez; Omar Jiménez-Zarazúa; Karen Guerrero-Toriz; Michelle P Loeza-Uribe; Erika K Tenorio-Aguirre; Jesús G Mendoza-García; Jaime D Mondragón
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2020-07-26

3.  Successful peritoneal dialysis for the end-stage kidney disease associated with Prader-Willi syndrome: a case report.

Authors:  Emi Anno; Keiichiro Hori; Ainori Hoshimoto; Makiko Harano; Sou Hagiwara; Kaori Oishi; Yoshinari Yokoyama; Yusuke Tsukamoto; Minoru Kubota
Journal:  CEN Case Rep       Date:  2019-04-08

4.  Percutaneous insertion of peritoneal dialysis catheter is a safe and effective technique irrespective of BMI.

Authors:  Dayang Xie; Jianhui Zhou; Xueying Cao; Qingtao Zhang; Yanli Sun; Li Tang; Jing Huang; Juanli Zheng; Li Lin; Zhenzhen Li; Guangyan Cai; Xiangmei Chen
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 2.388

5.  Association between different peritoneal dialysis catheter placement methods and short-term postoperative complications.

Authors:  Yibo Ma; Shuiqing Liu; Min Yang; Yun Zou; Dong Xue; Yanping Liu; Yufeng Wang; Xiao Xie; Hui Chen
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.388

6.  LAPAROSCOPIC PERITONEAL DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT WITH RECTUS SHEATH TUNNELING: A ONE-PORT SIMPLIFIED TECHNIQUE.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Buffara Blitzkow; Gilson Biagini; Carlos Antonio Sabbag; Victor Assad Buffara-Junior
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2022-09-16

7.  Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion by Nephrologist Using Minilaparotomy: Do Survival and Complications Vary in Obese?

Authors:  Pavitra Manu Dogra; Ranjith K Nair; Amit Katyal; G Shanmugraj; Ashok K Hooda; Anantharam Jairam; Satish Mendonca; Parikshit Singh Chauhan
Journal:  Indian J Nephrol       Date:  2021-04-02

8.  Intraperitoneal extension of the peritoneal dialysis catheter-a new technique for catheter implantation in patients with obesity.

Authors:  Michael Sayer; Christian Thiel; Martin Schenk; Alfred Königsrainer; Nils Heyne; Andreas L Birkenfeld; Ferruh Artunc; Karolin Thiel
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.902

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.