Literature DB >> 27524427

Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion using rectus sheath tunnel and selective omentopexy significantly reduces catheter dysfunction and increases peritoneal dialysis longevity.

Monika A Krezalek1, Nicolas Bonamici2, Brittany Lapin2, JoAnn Carbray2, Jose Velasco2, Woody Denham2, John Linn2, Michael Ujiki2, Stephen P Haggerty3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Success of peritoneal dialysis depends on the durability of the peritoneal dialysis catheter, which in turn depends on insertion technique. Catheter-related complications are among the main reasons for peritoneal dialysis failure. Techniques showing evidence of improved catheter function include rectus sheath tunnel, selective omentopexy, and adhesiolysis.
METHODS: Single-institution retrospective review of consecutive peritoneal dialysis catheter insertions was performed between 2004 and 2014. Of 235 procedures, the open technique was utilized in 63, basic laparoscopy with selective adhesiolysis in 80, and advanced laparoscopy utilizing rectus sheath tunnel, selective omentopexy, and adhesiolysis in 92. Primary outcomes included catheter dysfunction, catheter dysfunction-free, and overall survival.
RESULTS: Mechanical catheter dysfunction occurred in 4 patients (4.4%) in the advanced laparoscopy group, 14 (17.5%) in the basic laparoscopy group, and 20 (31.8%) in the open group (P < .01). The advanced laparoscopy group had the highest rate of dysfunction-free and overall catheter survival. The rectus sheath tunnel was protective independently of dysfunction free catheter survival. The rate of switch to hemodialysis also was significantly lower in the advanced laparoscopic group (P = .031).
CONCLUSION: Advanced laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion using rectus sheath tunnel, selective omentopexy, and adhesiolysis is associated with decreased catheter dysfunction rates, improved dysfunction-free and overall catheter survival, and lowest rate of switch to hemodialysis.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27524427     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  5 in total

1.  The ideal position of the peritoneal dialysis catheter is not always ideal.

Authors:  Tatiana Tanasiychuk; Rafael Selgas; Daniel Kushnir; Muhammad Abd Elhalim; Alon Antebi; Gloria Del Peso; Maria A Bajo; Victor Frajewicki
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Peritoneal dialysis catheter function and survival are not adversely affected by obesity regardless of the operative technique used.

Authors:  Monika A Krezalek; Nicolas Bonamici; Kristine Kuchta; Brittany Lapin; JoAnn Carbray; Woody Denham; John Linn; Michael Ujiki; Stephen P Haggerty
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Outcomes of peritoneal dialysis catheter configurations and pelvic fixation.

Authors:  Yash K Pandya; Jason K Wagner; Theodore Yuo; Mohammad Eslami; Michael J Singh; Eric S Hager
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2019-05-18

4.  Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Emplacement by Advanced Laparoscopy: 8-year Experience from a Medical Center of China.

Authors:  Min Mo; Yongle Ju; Haitang Hu; Wei Zhang; Jianyi Pan; Qingkun Zheng; Jinzhong Chen; Lijuan Su; Xianrui Dou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Randomized controlled trials for comparison of laparoscopic versus conventional open catheter placement in peritoneal dialysis patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mei-Lan Sun; Yong Zhang; Bo Wang; Te-An Ma; Hong Jiang; Shou-Liang Hu; Piao Zhang; Yan-Hong Tuo
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.388

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.