Literature DB >> 7948239

Weight limitations for weekly urea clearances using various exchange volumes in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

K D Nolph1, R A Jensen, R Khanna, Z J Twardowski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To calculate the relationships of weekly KT/V urea to standard body weight with different exchange volumes (2, 2.5, or 3 L) for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) in functionally anephric patients and to display the results in graphic form.
DESIGN: Theoretical calculations using previously measured 24-hour dialysate/plasma urea values in 77 CAPD patients and other defined components of weekly KT/V urea.
SETTING: Measurements and calculations in theoretical patients doing standard CAPD with four daily exchanges. PATIENTS: Theoretical functionally anephric patients on standard CAPD as above.
INTERVENTIONS: Theoretical calculations based on instillation of 2-, 2.5-, and 3-L exchange volumes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Weekly urea clearances normalized to total body water (weekly KT/V urea). The values using different exchange volumes were related to standard body weight.
RESULTS: Although a minimum recommended weekly KT/V urea target is arbitrary, the results illustrate the range of flexibility of CAPD relative to KT/V urea values with variations in exchange volume. The standard weights above which anephric patients on CAPD using four exchanges per day with 2-, 2.5-, and 3-L exchanges cannot reach a weekly KT/V urea target of 1.7, have been identified. The range of weekly KT/V urea levels possible with different exchange-volume programs has been graphically illustrated.
CONCLUSIONS: Weights above which a weekly KT/V urea of 1.7 cannot be reached in functionally anephric patients are 64, 77.6, and 91 kg for CAPD using 2-, 2.5-, and 3-L exchanges, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7948239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  5 in total

Review 1.  Sex or body size? Selection of dialysis type revisited.

Authors:  A Levin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-03-23       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Peritoneal dialysis catheter function and survival are not adversely affected by obesity regardless of the operative technique used.

Authors:  Monika A Krezalek; Nicolas Bonamici; Kristine Kuchta; Brittany Lapin; JoAnn Carbray; Woody Denham; John Linn; Michael Ujiki; Stephen P Haggerty
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Association of Alternative Approaches to Normalizing Peritoneal Dialysis Clearance with Mortality and Technique Failure: A Retrospective Analysis Using the United States Renal Data System-Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study, Wave 2.

Authors:  Suzanne M Boyle; Yimei Li; F Perry Wilson; Joel D Glickman; Harold I Feldman
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 4.  The Incidence and Pathophysiology of the Obesity Paradox: Should Peritoneal Dialysis and Kidney Transplant Be Offered to Patients with Obesity and End-Stage Renal Disease?

Authors:  Ramzi Vareldzis; Mihran Naljayan; Efrain Reisin
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  Peritoneal Dialysis as a First versus Second Option after Previous Haemodialysis: A Very Long-Term Assessment.

Authors:  Roberto José Barone; María Inés Cámpora; Nélida Susana Gimenez; Liliana Ramirez; Sergio Alberto Panese; Mónica Santopietro
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2014-11-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.