Literature DB >> 23470040

Patient education has a positive effect in patients with a stoma: a systematic review.

A K Danielsen1, J Burcharth, J Rosenberg.   

Abstract

AIM: A systematic review was performed to assess whether education of patients having stoma formation improves quality of life and whether it is cost effective.
METHOD: A literature search was performed to identify studies on the structured education of ostomates and outcome using the following databases: MEDLINE, Cinahl, Embase, Cochrane and PsycInfo. Inclusion criteria were: clinical studies reporting effects of educational interventions in relation to patients with a stoma. Commentaries or studies not testing an intervention were excluded.
RESULTS: Seven articles met the inclusion criteria of having rigorously evaluated an educational programme related to living with a stoma. The programmes were organized in different ways and had explored various interventions. The results showed an increase in health-related quality of life, as measured using a stoma quality of life instrument (P = 0.00001) and with the Short Form 36 (SF-36) (P = 0.000-0.006), an increase in proficiency in management of the stoma (P = 0.0005), two studies pointed to a reduction in postoperative hospital stay (8 days vs 10 days, P = 0.029; and 8 days vs 14 days, P = 0.17), a significant reduction in cost in the intervention group ($US 8570.54) compared with the control group ($US 7396.90) as well as higher effectiveness scores in the intervention group (166.89) compared with the control group (110.98), a significant rise in stoma-related knowledge (P = 0.0000) and an increase in psychosocial adjustment (P = 0.000).
CONCLUSION: Structured patient education aimed at patients' psychosocial needs seems to have a positive effect on quality of life as well as on cost. The interventions may be performed before, during or after hospital stay. However, the available data come from few studies with differences in interventions and in study design, and further studies are therefore needed before a final conclusion can be drawn. Colorectal Disease
© 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23470040     DOI: 10.1111/codi.12197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  23 in total

1.  A mixed-method study on the generic and ostomy-specific quality of life of cancer and non-cancer ostomy patients.

Authors:  Femke Jansen; Cornelia F van Uden-Kraan; J Annemieke Braakman; Paulina M van Keizerswaard; Birgit I Witte; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Essential Elements for Enhanced Recovery After Intra-abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Amir Elhassan; Ihab Elhassan; Amjad Elhassan; Krish D Sekar; Ryan E Rubin; Richard D Urman; Elyse M Cornett; Alan David Kaye
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2019-03-11

3.  Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Joseph C Carmichael; Deborah S Keller; Gabriele Baldini; Liliana Bordeianou; Eric Weiss; Lawrence Lee; Marylise Boutros; James McClane; Scott R Steele; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Diverting ileostomy in colorectal surgery: when is it necessary?

Authors:  Mark H Hanna; Alessio Vinci; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Emergency Room Visits and Readmissions Following Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (iERAS) Program.

Authors:  Trevor Wood; Mary-Anne Aarts; Allan Okrainec; Emily Pearsall; J Charles Victor; Marg McKenzie; Ori Rotstein; Robin S McLeod
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  The effect of preoperative stoma training for patients undergoing colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  M J Hughes; W Cunningham; S Yalamarthi
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Diverting ileostomy during primary debulking surgery for ovarian cancer: Associated factors and postoperative outcomes.

Authors:  Jill H Tseng; Rudy S Suidan; Oliver Zivanovic; Ginger J Gardner; Yukio Sonoda; Douglas A Levine; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; William P Tew; Dennis S Chi; Kara Long Roche
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Intestinal Ostomy.

Authors:  Peter C Ambe; Nadja Rebecca Kurz; Claudia Nitschke; Siad F Odeh; Gabriela Möslein; Hubert Zirngibl
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 9.  American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Survivorship Care Guidelines.

Authors:  Khaled El-Shami; Kevin C Oeffinger; Nicole L Erb; Anne Willis; Jennifer K Bretsch; Mandi L Pratt-Chapman; Rachel S Cannady; Sandra L Wong; Johnie Rose; April L Barbour; Kevin D Stein; Katherine B Sharpe; Durado D Brooks; Rebecca L Cowens-Alvarado
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 10.  Colorectal Cancer in Elderly Patients with Surgical Indication: State of the Art, Current Management, Role of Frailty and Benefits of a Geriatric Liaison.

Authors:  Nicolás M González-Senac; Jennifer Mayordomo-Cava; Angela Macías-Valle; Paula Aldama-Marín; Sara Majuelos González; María Luisa Cruz Arnés; Luis M Jiménez-Gómez; María T Vidán-Astiz; José Antonio Serra-Rexach
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.