Literature DB >> 28916924

Detecting nonadherence without loss in efficiency: A simple extension of the crosswise model.

Daniel W Heck1, Adrian Hoffmann2, Morten Moshagen3.   

Abstract

In surveys concerning sensitive behavior or attitudes, respondents often do not answer truthfully, because of social desirability bias. To elicit more honest responding, the randomized-response (RR) technique aims at increasing perceived and actual anonymity by prompting respondents to answer with a randomly modified and thus uninformative response. In the crosswise model, as a particularly promising variant of the RR, this is achieved by adding a second, nonsensitive question and by prompting respondents to answer both questions jointly. Despite increased privacy protection and empirically higher prevalence estimates of socially undesirable behaviors, evidence also suggests that some respondents might still not adhere to the instructions, in turn leading to questionable results. Herein we propose an extension of the crosswise model (ECWM) that makes it possible to detect several types of response biases with adequate power in realistic sample sizes. Importantly, the ECWM allows for testing the validity of the model's assumptions without any loss in statistical efficiency. Finally, we provide an empirical example supporting the usefulness of the ECWM.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Measurement model; Randomized response; Sensitive questions; Social desirability; Survey design

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 28916924     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-017-0957-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  10 in total

1.  Improving self-report measures of medication non-adherence using a cheating detection extension of the randomised-response-technique.

Authors:  Martin Ostapczuk; Jochen Musch; Morten Moshagen
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 2.  Sensitive questions in surveys.

Authors:  Roger Tourangeau; Ting Yan
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  An experimental validation method for questioning techniques that assess sensitive issues.

Authors:  Morten Moshagen; Benjamin E Hilbig; Edgar Erdfelder; Annie Moritz
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2014-01-01

4.  Assessing the validity of two indirect questioning techniques: A Stochastic Lie Detector versus the Crosswise Model.

Authors:  Adrian Hoffmann; Jochen Musch
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2016-09

5.  Asking sensitive questions: a statistical power analysis of randomized response models.

Authors:  Rolf Ulrich; Hannes Schröter; Heiko Striegel; Perikles Simon
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2012-08-27

6.  Reducing socially desirable responses in epidemiologic surveys: an extension of the randomized-response technique.

Authors:  Morten Moshagen; Jochen Musch; Martin Ostapczuk; Zengmei Zhao
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  On the comprehensibility and perceived privacy protection of indirect questioning techniques.

Authors:  Adrian Hoffmann; Berenike Waubert de Puiseau; Alexander F Schmidt; Jochen Musch
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2017-08

8.  A stochastic lie detector.

Authors:  Morten Moshagen; Jochen Musch; Edgar Erdfelder
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-03

9.  A Strong Validation of the Crosswise Model Using Experimentally-Induced Cheating Behavior.

Authors:  Adrian Hoffmann; Birk Diedenhofen; Bruno Verschuere; Jochen Musch
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2015

10.  Prevalence of use of anabolic steroids by bodybuilders using three methods in a city of iran.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Nakhaee; Faezeh Pakravan; Nouzar Nakhaee
Journal:  Addict Health       Date:  2013 Summer-Autumn
  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Do they really wash their hands? Prevalence estimates for personal hygiene behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic based on indirect questions.

Authors:  Laura Mieth; Maike M Mayer; Adrian Hoffmann; Axel Buchner; Raoul Bell
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  More than random responding: Empirical evidence for the validity of the (Extended) Crosswise Model.

Authors:  Julia Meisters; Adrian Hoffmann; Jochen Musch
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04-21

3.  Functionality of the Crosswise Model for Assessing Sensitive or Transgressive Behavior: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dominic Sagoe; Maarten Cruyff; Owen Spendiff; Razieh Chegeni; Olivier de Hon; Martial Saugy; Peter G M van der Heijden; Andrea Petróczi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-23

4.  Self-protective and self-sacrificing preferences of pedestrians and passengers in moral dilemmas involving autonomous vehicles.

Authors:  Maike M Mayer; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.