Literature DB >> 27631988

On the comprehensibility and perceived privacy protection of indirect questioning techniques.

Adrian Hoffmann1, Berenike Waubert de Puiseau2, Alexander F Schmidt3, Jochen Musch2.   

Abstract

On surveys that assess sensitive personal attributes, indirect questioning aims at increasing respondents' willingness to answer truthfully by protecting confidentiality. However, the assumption that subjects understand questioning procedures fully and trust them to protect their privacy is rarely tested. In a scenario-based design, we compared four indirect questioning procedures in terms of their comprehensibility and perceived privacy protection. All indirect questioning techniques were found to be less comprehensible by respondents than a conventional direct question used for comparison. Less-educated respondents experienced more difficulties when confronted with any indirect questioning technique. Regardless of education, the crosswise model was found to be the most comprehensible among the four indirect methods. Indirect questioning in general was perceived to increase privacy protection in comparison to a direct question. Unexpectedly, comprehension and perceived privacy protection did not correlate. We recommend assessing these factors separately in future evaluations of indirect questioning.

Keywords:  Comprehension; Confidentiality; Crosswise model; Randomized response technique; Stochastic lie detector

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27631988     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-016-0804-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  8 in total

1.  Detecting nonadherence without loss in efficiency: A simple extension of the crosswise model.

Authors:  Daniel W Heck; Adrian Hoffmann; Morten Moshagen
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-10

Review 2.  Asking sensitive questions in conservation using Randomised Response Techniques.

Authors:  Harriet Ibbett; Julia P G Jones; Freya A V St John
Journal:  Biol Conserv       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.990

3.  Physical and cognitive doping in university students using the unrelated question model (UQM): Assessing the influence of the probability of receiving the sensitive question on prevalence estimation.

Authors:  Pavel Dietz; Anne Quermann; Mireille Nicoline Maria van Poppel; Heiko Striegel; Hannes Schröter; Rolf Ulrich; Perikles Simon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Can detailed instructions and comprehension checks increase the validity of crosswise model estimates?

Authors:  Julia Meisters; Adrian Hoffmann; Jochen Musch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  More than random responding: Empirical evidence for the validity of the (Extended) Crosswise Model.

Authors:  Julia Meisters; Adrian Hoffmann; Jochen Musch
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04-21

6.  Functionality of the Crosswise Model for Assessing Sensitive or Transgressive Behavior: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dominic Sagoe; Maarten Cruyff; Owen Spendiff; Razieh Chegeni; Olivier de Hon; Martial Saugy; Peter G M van der Heijden; Andrea Petróczi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-23

7.  More is not always better: An experimental individual-level validation of the randomized response technique and the crosswise model.

Authors:  Marc Höglinger; Ben Jann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Self-protective and self-sacrificing preferences of pedestrians and passengers in moral dilemmas involving autonomous vehicles.

Authors:  Maike M Mayer; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.