Literature DB >> 20639269

Improving self-report measures of medication non-adherence using a cheating detection extension of the randomised-response-technique.

Martin Ostapczuk1, Jochen Musch, Morten Moshagen.   

Abstract

Medication non-adherence is a serious problem for medical research and clinical practice. Self-reports are only moderately valid, and objective methods are cumbersome and expensive to administer. We sought to improve self-reports of medication non-adherence using a cheating detection extension of the randomised-response-technique (RRT). This RRT variant encourages more honest responses by offering interviewees a higher degree of anonymity while simultaneously allowing us to estimate the proportion of respondents disobeying the RRT instructions. The 597 patients were asked to report their lifetime prevalence of medication non-adherence under one of two different questioning procedures, direct questioning or randomised-response. When questioned directly, only 20.9% of patients admitted to intentional medication non-adherent behaviour, as opposed to 32.7% of patients under RRT conditions. Additionally, the cheating detection extension revealed a significant proportion of patients (47.1%) disobeying the instructions in the RRT condition. Assuming that either none or all of them were non-adherent, a lower and upper bound of 32.7% and 79.8%, respectively, could be estimated for the lifetime prevalence of non-adherent behaviour. The results demonstrate that self-report measures as well as traditional variants of the RRT, which do not take cheating into account, may provide considerably distorted estimates of the prevalence of medication non-adherence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20639269     DOI: 10.1177/0962280210372843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  5 in total

1.  Detecting nonadherence without loss in efficiency: A simple extension of the crosswise model.

Authors:  Daniel W Heck; Adrian Hoffmann; Morten Moshagen
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-10

Review 2.  Asking sensitive questions in conservation using Randomised Response Techniques.

Authors:  Harriet Ibbett; Julia P G Jones; Freya A V St John
Journal:  Biol Conserv       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.990

3.  New non-randomised model to assess the prevalence of discriminating behaviour: a pilot study on mephedrone.

Authors:  Andrea Petróczi; Tamás Nepusz; Paul Cross; Helen Taft; Syeda Shah; Nawed Deshmukh; Jay Schaffer; Maryann Shane; Christiana Adesanwo; James Barker; Declan P Naughton
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2011-08-03

4.  Testing of a Model with Latino Patients That Explains the Links Among Patient-Perceived Provider Cultural Sensitivity, Language Preference, and Patient Treatment Adherence.

Authors:  Jessica D Jones Nielsen; Whitney Wall; Carolyn M Tucker
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-06-20

5.  Can detailed instructions and comprehension checks increase the validity of crosswise model estimates?

Authors:  Julia Meisters; Adrian Hoffmann; Jochen Musch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.