Literature DB >> 28914795

Synthesis, In Vitro α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activity and Molecular Docking Studies of Novel Benzothiazole-Triazole Derivatives.

Zipeng Gong1,2,3, Yaping Peng4, Jie Qiu5, Anbai Cao6, Guangcheng Wang7, Zhiyun Peng8.   

Abstract

Benzothiazole-triazole derivatives 6a-6s have been synthesized and characterized by ¹HNMR and 13C-NMR. All synthetic compounds were screened for their in vitro α-glucosidase inhibitory activity by using Baker's yeast α-glucosidase enzyme. The majority of compounds exhibited a varying degree of α-glucosidase inhibitory activity with IC50 values between 20.7 and 61.1 μM when compared with standard acarbose (IC50 = 817.38 μM). Among the series, compound 6s (IC50 = 20.7 μM) bearing a chlorine group at the 5-position of the benzothiazole ring and a tertbutyl group at the para position of the phenyl ring, was found to be the most active compound. Preliminary structure-activity relationships were established. Molecular docking studies were performed to predict the binding interaction of the compounds in the binding pocket of the enzyme.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benzothiazole; molecular docking; triazole; α-glucosidase

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28914795      PMCID: PMC6151782          DOI: 10.3390/molecules22091555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Molecules        ISSN: 1420-3049            Impact factor:   4.411


1. Introduction

Type 2 diabetes is the most common type of diabetes, accounting for about 95 percent of diabetes cases. It is characterized by high blood glucose (hyperglycemia), insulin resistance and relative lack of insulin [1]. Hyperglycemia plays an important role in the development of type 2 diabetes and complications associated with diseases such as microvascular and macrovascular diseases [2]. α-Glucosidase catalyzes the hydrolysis of terminal 1,4-linked α-d-glucose residues and releases free α-d-glucose, which is to the main cause of hyperglycemia [3]. Inhibition of α-glucosidase activity is one of the important therapeutic approaches for the treatment of type 2 diabetes by slowing the absorption process of glucose in intestine [4]. Three inhibitors of α-glucosidase enzyme (acarbose, miglitol, and voglibose) are being clinically used for the management of type 2 diabetes, and these are also used as anticancer [5], anti-HIV [6], and anti-hepatitis agents [7]. Benzothiazole is an important scaffold in bioorganic and medicinal chemistry, and has broad applications in drug discovery and development [8]. Benzothiazole-based compounds exhibit numerous biological activities such as anticonvulsant [9], anti-inflammatory [10], antimicrobial [11], anticancer [12] and anti-diabetic activities [13]. Some of benzothiazole-containing drugs, such as riluzole (anticonvulsant), ethoxzolamide (glaucoma, ulcers and as a diuretic), and zopolrestat (diabetic nephropathy and diabetes), have been used clinically for many years (Figure 1). Recently, M. Taha et al. reported the synthesis of a new class of benzothiazole hybrid with benzohydrazide moiety, and some of these showed superior activity compared to standard acarbose [14].
Figure 1

The structures of some commercial drugs containing benzothiazole or 1,2,3-triazole moiety.

On the other hand, 1,2,3-triazoles are an important class of heterocyclic compounds, and have been widely applied in various fields, including synthetic organic chemistry, biological science, material science and medicinal chemistry [15,16]. Notably, 1,2,3-triazole derivatives have been reported to exhibit various biological activities such as antioxidant [17], antibacterial [18], antitubercular [19] and anticancer [20]. There are some clinical and commercial drugs, such as tazobactam, cefatrizine and carboxyamidotriazole, with 1,2,3-triazole moiety (Figure 1). In particular, several recent studies have shown that some 1,2,3-triazole derivatives exhibit α-glucosidase inhibitory activity [21,22,23,24,25]. In continuation of our drug discovery research on potential antidiabetic agents [25,26,27,28], we synthesized a novel series of benzothiazole-triazole derivatives and evaluated for their in vitro α-glucosidase inhibitory activity. Furthermore, molecular docking was also performed to predict the binding interaction of the compounds in the binding pocket of the enzyme.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

The synthesis of benzothiazole-triazole derivatives 6a–6s is shown in Scheme 1. The reaction of various benzyl chlorides or benzyl bromides 1 with NaN3 in DMF at room temperature for 24 h provided the corresponding (azidomethyl)aryl 2. Treatment of substituted 2-aminobenzenethiol with CS2 in the presence of KOH in reflux EtOH/H2O afforded substituted benzo[d]thiazole-2-thiol 4, which reacted with 3-bromoprop-1-yne to provide the key intermediate 5. In the final step, according to Huisgen, the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction (click reaction), condensation of intermediate 5 with various (azidomethyl)aryl 2 in the presence of sodium ascorbate and CuSO4·5H2O in DMF solution resulted in the formation of the title products 6a–6s.
Scheme 1

(a) DMF, room temperature, 24 h; (b) KOH, EtOH/H2O, reflux, 12 h; (c) K2CO3, acetone, reflux, 5 h; (d) sodium ascorbate, CuSO4·5H2O, DMF, r.t., 4 h.

The structures of all the title compounds 6a–6s were characterized by 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR spectra (Supplementary Materials). For instance, the 1H-NMR spectrum of 6a shows two singlet signals at δ 4.68 ppm and δ 5.55 ppm, which were assigned to the methylene protons of SCH2 and NCH2, respectively. A doublet of two protons appeared at δ 7.19 ppm (J = 8.4 Hz), which was assigned to the aromatic protons of C2,6-H of the right phenyl ring. The benzothiazole protons appeared as two doublets of one proton each at δ 7.86 and δ 7.99 ppm, and a triplet of one proton at δ 7.37 ppm with a coupling constant of 8.0 Hz and 8.4 Hz, respectively. The rest of the protons of benzothiazole and the right phenyl appeared as a multiplet of three protons between δ 7.45 and 7.51 ppm. The single peak of the C-H of triazole ring was observed at δ 8.17 ppm. The 13C-NMR spectrum of 6a showed two characteristic peaks for methylene carbon at δ 27.9 ppm and δ 52.5 ppm. The remaining thirteen signals were assigned to benzothiazole, triazole and phenyl carbon in the compound 6a. Therefore, the data of 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR is in agreement with the structure of compound 6a.

2.2. α-Glucosidase Inhibition Assay

All the synthetic benzothiazole-triazole derivatives (6a–6s) were screened to evaluate their in vitro α-glucosidase inhibitory activity by using Baker’s yeast α-glucosidase enzyme. The results are summarized in Table 1. The majority of compounds exhibited a varying degree of α-glucosidase inhibitory activity with IC50 values between 20.7 and 61.1 μM when compared with standard acarbose (IC50 = 817.38 μM). Among the series, compounds 6a, 6e, 6i, 6m, 6n, 6o and 6s displayed potent inhibitory activity with IC50 values of 28.7, 27.4, 29.4, 28.2, 28.0, 22.3 and 20.7 μM.
Table 1

α-Glucosidase inhibitory activity of novel benzothiazole-triazole derivatives (6a–6s).

CompoundR1R2IC50 (μM)
6aH4-Br28.7
6bH2-Cl>100
6cH2-Br37.4
6dH3-F61.1
6eH4-Cl27.4
6fH2-F>100
6gHH>100
6hH3,5-Cl241.0
6iH4-tBu29.4
6jCl2-F45.9
6kCl2-Br48.4
6lCl2-Cl33.6
6mCl4-Cl28.2
6nCl4-Br28.0
6oCl3,5-Cl222.3
6pCl3-F38.6
6qCl4-F53.1
6rClH44.4
6sCl4-tBu20.7
Acarbose 817.38

2.3. Structure-Activity Relationship

The structure-activity relationship of this class of compounds has been summarized. The introduction of electron withdrawing groups such as fluorine, chlorine, and bromine into the phenyl ring results in an increase in inhibitory activity. Furthermore, shifting these groups from the para to the ortho position decreased inhibitory activity. Introduction of the electron-withdrawing group chlorine into the benzothiazole ring results in a significant increase in inhibitory activity. It is interesting to point out that 6i and 6s containing the tert-butyl group at the para position of the phenyl ring exhibited potent α-glucosidase inhibitory activity, with IC50 values of 29.4 and 20.7 μM, respectively. In particular, compound 6s with a chlorine group at the 5-position of the benzothiazole ring and a tert-butyl group at the para position of the phenyl ring, was found to be the most active compound in this series. In order to illustrate the binding interactions of molecules into the active site of α-glucosidase, molecular docking studies were conducted.

2.4. Molecular Docking

The theoretical binding mode between 6i and Saccharomyces cerevisiae α-glucosidase is shown in Figure 2. Compound 6i adopted an “L-shaped” conformation in the pocket of the α-glucosidase. The benzothiazole group of 6i was located at the hydrophobic pocket, surrounded by the residues Phe-157, Phe-310 and Phe-311, while the 4-(tert-butyl)phenyl group of 6i stretched into the hydrophobic pocket consisting of Phe-157, Phe-177 and Phe-300, forming a stable hydrophobic binding. Detailed analysis showed that the triazole group in the middle of 6i formed CH-π interaction with the residue Phe-300. In addition, cation-π interactions were observed between 6i and the residues Lys-155, Arg-312 and Arg-439. Furthermore, 6i formed anion-π interactions with the residues Glu-276 and Asp-349, respectively. All these interactions helped 6i to anchor in the binding site of the α-glucosidase.
Figure 2

Compound 6i was docked to the binding pocket of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae α-glucosidase.

To explain the activity order of 6i and 6s against α-glucosidase, 6s was then docked to the binding site of α-glucosidase; the theoretical binding mode between 6s and α-glucosidase is shown in Figure 3A. The interaction between 6s and α-glucosidase was almost the same as the precursor 6i. The only difference was that the benzothiazole group of 6s formed π-π stacking interactions with the residues His-239 and Phe-157, which were not formed by 6i, making 6s more active than 6i against α-glucosidase (Figure 3B). In addition, the estimated binding energies were −8.6 kcal·mol−1 for 6i and −8.9 kcal·mol−1 for 6s, respectively, which was consistent with the results of the in vitro anti-α-glucosidase assay. In summary, the above molecular simulations give us rational explanation of the interactions between 6i, 6s and α-glucosidase, which provided valuable information for further development of α-glucosidase inhibitors.
Figure 3

(A) Compound 6s was docked to the binding pocket of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae α-glucosidase; (B) Compounds 6i and 6s were docked to the binding pocket of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae α-glucosidase (overlapped).

3. Experimental Section

3.1. General

All starting materials and reagents were purchased from commercial suppliers. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectra (NMR) were recorded on a Bruker spectrometer (400 MHz) with TMS as an external reference and reported in parts per million.

3.2. General Procedure for the Synthesis of

A mixture of substituted benzyl chlorides or benzyl bromides 1 (1.0 mmol) and NaN3 (1.2 mmol) in 10 mL DMF was stirred at room temperature for 24 h. After the completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC), the mixture was poured into water and extracted 3 times for ethyl acetate. The combined organic layers were dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated under vacuum. The residue was purified by chromatography to give 2.

3.3. General Procedure for the Synthesis of

To a solution of substituted 2-aminobenzenethiol (2 mmol) in EtOH (20 mL) was added CS2 (4 mmol) and KOH (4 mmol), and the mixture was stirred at 80 °C for 12 h. After cooling to the room temperature, the mixture was treated with ice-water (100 mL) and 10% HCl was added to adjust pH to 2–3. The solid precipitate was collected by filtration to obtain 4, which was used in the next step without further purification.

3.4. General Procedure for the Synthesis of

A mixture of 4 (1 mmol), 3-bromoprop-1-yne (1.5 mmol) and K2CO3 (3 mmol) in acetone (20 mL) was stirred at reflux for 5 h. The solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by chromatography to give 5.

3.5. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Benzothiazole-Triazole Derivatives (–)

A mixture of 5 (1.0 mmol), 2 (1.0 mmol), CuSO4·5H2O (0.025 g; 0.1 mmol) and sodium ascorbate (0.10 g, 0.5 mmol) in DMF (10 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 4 h. After completion of reaction, the content was poured into 50 mL ice cold water and extracted with ethylacetate (50 mL × 3). The combined organic extracts were dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated. The residue was purified by chromatography on silica gel with EtOAc/petroleum ether to give the title products 6a–6s. 2-(((1-(4-Bromobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)thio)benzo[d]thiazole (6a). Yellow solid, yield 65%, m.p. 112–114 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ: 4.68 (s, 2H, SCH2), 5.55 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.19 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 7.37 (t, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 7.45–7.51 (m, 3H, ArH), 7.86 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.99 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 8.17 (s, 1H, CH-triazole); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ: 27.9, 52.5, 121.7, 121.8, 122.3, 124.6, 125.0, 126.8, 130.5, 132.1, 135.2, 135.8, 143.2, 153.0, 166.1; MS (ESI, m/z): 416.96 [M + H]+. 2-(((1-(2-Chlorobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)thio)benzo[d]thiazole (6b). Yellow solid, yield 79%, m.p. 110–111 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ: 4.69 (s, 2H, SCH2), 5.66 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.11 (dd, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, 1.2 Hz, ArH), 7.27 (dt, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, 1.2 Hz, ArH), 7.33–7.39 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.45–7.49 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.86 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.99 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 8.15 (s, 1H, CH-triazole); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ: 27.9, 51.1, 121.7, 122.3, 125.0, 125.0, 126.8, 128.1, 130.0, 130.6, 130.7, 133.0, 133.7, 135.2, 143.0, 153.0, 166.1; MS (ESI, m/z): 373.03 [M + H]+. 2-(((1-(2-Bromobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)thio)benzo[d]thiazole (6c). Yellow solid, yield 52%, m.p. 104–106 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ: 4.70 (s, 2H, SCH2), 5.64 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.05 (dd, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, 1.2 Hz, ArH), 7.24–7.33 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.37 (dt, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, 1.2 Hz, ArH), 7.47 (dt, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, 1.2 Hz, ArH), 7.62 (dd, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, 1.2 Hz, ArH), 7.86 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.99 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 8.14 (s, 1H, CH-triazole); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ: 27.9, 53.4, 121.7, 122.3, 123.2, 125.0, 125.0, 126.8, 128.6, 130.7, 130.8, 133.3, 135.2, 135.3, 143.0, 153.0, 166.0; MS (ESI, m/z): 416.98 [M + H]+. 2-(((1-(3-Fluorobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)thio)benzo[d]thiazole (6d). White solid, yield 67%, m.p. 112–114 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ: 4.69 (s, 2H, SCH2), 5.59 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.06–7.16 (m, 3H, ArH), 7.33–7.38 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.47 (dt, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, 1.2 Hz, ArH), 7.87 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.99 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 8.22 (s, 1H, CH-triazole); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ: 27.9, 52.6, 115.1 (d, 1C, J = 21.0 Hz), 115.3 (d, 1C, J = 21.0 Hz), 121.7, 122.3, 124.3 (d, 1C, J = 2.8 Hz), 124.7, 125.0, 126.8, 131.2 (d, 1C, J = 8.3 Hz), 135.2, 139.1 (d, 1C, J = 7.5 Hz), 143.2, 153.0, 161.3 (d, 1C, J = 243 Hz), 166.1; MS (ESI, m/z): 357.06 [M + H]+. 2-(((1-(4-Chlorobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)thio)benzo[d]thiazole (6e). White solid, yield 81%, m.p. 119–120 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ: 4.68 (s, 2H, SCH2), 5.57 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.25 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 7.36 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 7.40 (dd, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, 2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.96 (d, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz, ArH), 8.03 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 8.20 (s, 1H, CH-triazole); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ: 28.0, 52.5, 121.2, 123.7, 124.8, 125.0, 129.1, 130.2, 131.7, 133.3 134.0, 135.4, 143.0, 153.9, 169.0; MS (ESI, m/z): 373.03 [M + H]+. 2-(((1-(2-Fluorobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)thio)benzo[d]thiazole (6f). Yellow solid, yield 64%, m.p. 86–88 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ: 4.69 (s, 2H, SCH2), 5.63 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.12–7.28 (m, 3H, ArH), 7.35–7.39 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.47 (dt, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, 1.2 Hz, ArH), 7.86 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.99 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 8.16 (s, 1H, CH-triazole); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ: 27.9, 47.3 (d, 1C, J = 3.8 Hz), 115.9 (d, 1C, J = 20.8 Hz), 121.7, 122.3, 123.2 (d, 1C, J = 14.6 Hz), 124.7, 125.0, 125.2 (d, 1C, J = 3.5 Hz), 126.8, 131.0 (d, 1C, J = 3.5 Hz), 131.1 (d, 1C, J = 8.2 Hz), 135.2, 143.1, 153.0, 159.3 (d, 1C, J = 245 Hz), 166.1; MS (ESI, m/z): 357.06 [M + H]+. 2-(((1-Benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)thio)benzo[d]thiazole (6g) [29]. White solid, yield 72%, m.p. 109–110 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ: 4.68 (s, 2H, SCH2), 5.56 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.23–7.25 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.28–7.31 (m, 3H, ArH), 7.37 (dt, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, 1.2 Hz, ArH), 7.47 (dt, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, 1.2 Hz, ArH), 7.87 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 8.00 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 8.18 (s, 1H, CH-triazole); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ: 27.9, 53.2, 121.7, 122.3, 124.6, 125.0, 126.8, 128.3, 128.5, 129.2, 135.2, 136.4, 143.1, 153.1, 166.1; MS (ESI, m/z): 339.07 [M + H]+. 2-(((1-(3,5-Dichlorobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)thio)benzo[d]thiazole (6h). White solid, yield 75%, m.p. 85–87 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ: 4.69 (s, 2H, SCH2), 5.65 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.15 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.35–7.39 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.47 (dt, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, 1.2 Hz, ArH), 7.64 (d, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.86 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 8.00 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 8.15 (s, 1H, CH-triazole); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ: 27.9, 50.5, 121.7, 122.3, 125.0, 126.8, 128.3, 129.6, 132.2, 132.8, 134.1, 134.4, 135.2, 143.1, 153.0, 166.0; MS (ESI, m/z): 406.99 [M + H]+. 2-(((1-(4-(Tert-butyl)benzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)thio)benzo[d]thiazole (6i). Yellow solid, yield 51%, m.p. 77–78 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ: 1.22 (s, 9H, CH3), 4.68 (s, 2H, SCH2), 5.51 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.15 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 7.29 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 7.37 (t, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.47 (t, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.87 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.99 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 8.16 (s, 1H, CH-triazole); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ: 27.9, 31.5, 34.7, 53.0, 121.7, 122.3, 124.5, 125.0, 125.9, 126.8, 128.1, 133.5, 135.2, 143.1, 151.0, 153.1, 166.1; MS (ESI, m/z): 395.13 [M + H]+. 5-Chloro-2-(((1-(2-fluorobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)thio)benzo[d]thiazole (6j). White solid, yield 63%, m.p. 115–117 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ: 4.68 (s, 2H, SCH2), 5.63 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.12–7.27 (m, 3H, ArH), 7.35–7.40 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.40 (dd, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, 2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.94 (d, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz, ArH), 8.03 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 8.17 (s, 1H, CH-triazole); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ: 28.0, 47.3 (d, 1C, J = 3.9 Hz), 115.9 (d, 1C, J = 20.8 Hz), 121.2, 123.2 (d, 1C, J = 14.6 Hz), 123.7, 124.8, 125.0, 125.2 (d, 1C, J = 3.6 Hz), 131.0 (d, 1C, J = 3.5 Hz), 131.9 (d, 1C, J = 8.2 Hz), 131.6, 134.0, 142.9, 153.9, 159.2 (d, 1C, J = 245 Hz), 169.0; MS (ESI, m/z): 391.02 [M + H]+. 2-(((1-(2-Bromobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)thio)-5-chlorobenzo[d]thiazole (6k). White solid, yield 79%, m.p. 119–120 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ: 4.69 (s, 2H, SCH2), 5.64 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.05 (dd, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, 2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.24–7.33 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.40 (dd, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, 2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.61 (dd, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, 1.2 Hz, ArH), 7.93 (d, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz, ArH), 8.02 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz, ArH), 8.16 (s, 1H, CH-triazole); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ: 28.0, 53.4, 121.2, 123.2, 123.7, 125.0, 125.2, 128.6, 130.7, 130.8, 131.6, 133.3, 134.0, 135.3, 142.8, 153.9, 168.9; MS (ESI, m/z): 450.93 [M + H]+. 5-Chloro-2-(((1-(2-chlorobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)thio)benzo[d]thiazole (6l). White solid, yield 66%, m.p. 128–130 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ: 4.69 (s, 2H, SCH2), 5.66 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.11 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.27 (t, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.36 (dt, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, 2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.40 (dd, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz, 2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.45 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.94 (d, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz, ArH), 8.03 (d, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz, ArH), 8.16 (s, 1H, CH-triazole); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ: 28.0, 51.1, 121.2, 123.7, 125.0, 125.2, 128.1, 130.0, 130.6, 130.7, 131.6, 133.0, 133.7, 134.0, 142.8, 153.9, 168.9; MS (ESI, m/z): 406.99 [M + H]+. 5-Chloro-2-(((1-(4-chlorobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)thio)benzo[d]thiazole (6m). White solid, yield 78%, m.p. 111–112 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ: 4.68 (s, 2H, SCH2), 5.57 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.25 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.36 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 7.40 (dd, 1H, J = 8.8 Hz, 2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.95 (d, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz, ArH), 8.02 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 8.20 (s, 1H, CH-triazole); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ: 28.0, 52.4, 121.2, 123.7, 124.8, 125.0, 129.1, 130.2, 131.6, 133.3, 134.0, 135.4, 143.1, 153.9, 169.0; MS (ESI, m/z): 406.99 [M + H]+. 2-(((1-(4-Bromobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)thio)-5-chlorobenzo[d]thiazole (6n). White solid, yield 73%, m.p. 114–116 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ: 4.68 (s, 2H, SCH2), 5.55 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.19 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 7.41 (dd, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, 2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.49 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 7.96 (d, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz, ArH), 8.03 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 8.21 (s, 1H, CH-triazole); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ: 28.0, 52.5, 121.2, 121.8, 123.7, 124.8, 125.0, 130.5, 131.6, 132.1, 134.0, 135.9, 1443.1, 153.9, 169.0; MS (ESI, m/z): 452.94 [M + H]+. 5-Chloro-2-(((1-(3,5-dichlorobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)thio)benzo[d]thiazole (6o). Yellow solid, yield 55%, m.p. 124–126 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ: 4.69 (s, 2H, SCH2), 5.65 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.15 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 7.36 (dd, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, 2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.41 (dd, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, 2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.63 (d, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.94 (d, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz, ArH), 8.03 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 8.17 (s, 1H, CH-triazole); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ: 27.9, 50.5, 121.2, 123.7, 125.0, 125.2, 128.2, 129.5, 131.6, 132.1, 132.9, 134.0, 134.1, 134.4, 142.9, 153.9, 168.9; MS (ESI, m/z): 440.95 [M + H]+. 5-Chloro-2-(((1-(3-fluorobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)thio)benzo[d]thiazole (6p). White solid, yield 74%, m.p. 140–141 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ: 4.68 (s, 2H, SCH2), 5.59 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.06–7.14 (m, 3H, ArH), 7.34–7.36 (m, 1H, ArH), 7.40 (dd, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, 2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.95 (d, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz, ArH), 8.02 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 8.23 (s, 1H, CH-triazole); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ: 28.0, 52.6, 115.0 (d, 1C, J = 21.9 Hz), 115.3 (d, 1C, J = 20.8 Hz), 121.2, 123.7, 124.3 (d, 1C, J = 2.8 Hz), 124.9, 125.0, 131.2 (d, 1C, J = 5.3 Hz), 131.7, 134.0, 139.1 (d, 1C, J = 7.5 Hz), 143.1, 153.9, 161.3 (d, 1C, J = 243 Hz), 169.0; MS (ESI, m/z): 391.02 [M + H]+. 5-Chloro-2-(((1-(4-fluorobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)thio)benzo[d]thiazole (6q). Yellow solid, yield 68%, m.p. 108–109 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ: 4.68 (s, 2H, SCH2), 5.55 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.14 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz, ArH), 7.31–7.34 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.41 (dd, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, 2.0 Hz, ArH), 7.95 (d, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz, ArH), 8.03 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 8.19 (s, 1H, CH-triazole); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ: 28.0, 52.5, 115.9 (d, 1C, J = 21.5 Hz), 121.2, 123.7, 124.6, 125.0, 130.6 (d, 1C, J = 8.3 Hz), 131.6, 132.7 (d, 1C, J = 3.1 Hz), 134.0, 143.0, 153.9, 161.1 (d, 1C, J = 243 Hz), 169.0; MS (ESI, m/z): 391.02 [M + H]+. 2-(((1-Benzyl-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)thio)-5-chlorobenzo[d]thiazole (6r) [29]. White solid, yield 75%, m.p. 142–144 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ: 4.68 (s, 2H, SCH2), 5.56 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.25–7.30 (m, 5H, ArH), 7.41 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 7.96 (d, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz, ArH), 8.03 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 8.19 (s, 1H, CH-triazole); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ: 28.0, 53.3, 121.2, 123.7, 124.7, 125.0, 128.3, 128.5, 129.1, 131.6, 134.0, 136.4, 142.9, 153.9, 169.0; MS (ESI, m/z): 373.03 [M + H]+. 2-(((1-(4-(Tert-butyl)benzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methyl)thio)-5-chlorobenzo[d]thiazole (6s). Yellow solid, yield 78%, m.p. 94–95 °C. 1H-NMR (d6-DMSO, 400 MHz) δ: 1.22 (s, 9H, CH3), 4.67 (s, 2H, SCH2), 5.51 (s, 2H, NCH2), 7.15 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 7.28 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 7.40 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 7.97 (d, 1H, J = 2.0 Hz, ArH), 8.03 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz, ArH), 8.19 (s, 1H, CH-triazole); 13C-NMR (d6-DMSO, 100 MHz) δ: 28.0, 31.5, 34.7, 53.0, 121.2, 123.7, 124.7, 125.0, 125.9, 128.0, 131.6, 133.5, 134.0, 142.9, 151.0, 153.9, 169.0; MS (ESI, m/z): 429.09 [M + H]+.

3.6. In Vitro Assay of α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activity

α-Glucosidase inhibitory activity was assayed by using 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) at 37 °C. The enzyme (0.1 U/mL) in phosphate buffer saline was incubated with various concentrations of test compounds at 37 °C for 15 min. Then 1.25 mM p-nitrophenyl α-d-glucopyranoside was added to the mixture as a substrate. After further incubation at 37 °C for 30 min. The absorbance was measured spectrophotometrically at 405 nm. The sample solution was replaced by DMSO as a control. Acarbose was used as a positive control.

3.7. Molecular Docking

Molecular docking studies were performed to investigate the binding mode between 6i, 6s and α-glucosidase using Autodock vina 1.1.2. The 3D structure of α-glucosidase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been predicted using homology modeling in our previous report [25]. The 3D structure of the compounds were obtained by ChemBioDraw Ultra 14.0 and ChemBio3D Ultra 14.0 softwares. The AutoDockTools 1.5.6 package was employed to generate the docking input files. The search grid of α-glucosidase was identified as center_x: −19.676, center_y: −7.243, and center_z: −21.469, with dimensions size_x: 15, size_y: 15, and size_z: 15. The value of exhaustiveness was set to 20. For Vina docking, the default parameters were used if it was not mentioned. The best-scoring pose as judged by the Vina docking score was chosen and visually analyzed using PyMoL 1.7.6 software (http://www.pymol.org/).

4. Conclusions

In summary, a novel series of benzothiazole-triazole derivatives 6a–6s have been synthesized and evaluated for their α-glucosidase inhibitory activity. The majority of compounds exhibited superior α-glucosidase inhibitory activity in the range of IC50 = 20.7 and 61.1 μM as compared to standard acarbose (IC50 = 817.38 μM). Molecular docking study was carried out to understand the molecular interaction of compounds with the active site of α-glucosidase. This study has identified a novel series of lead compounds which can be used for the development of new α-glucosidase inhibitors.
  26 in total

1.  Synthesis and evaluation of pyrazolines bearing benzothiazole as anti-inflammatory agents.

Authors:  Chetna Kharbanda; Mohammad Sarwar Alam; Hinna Hamid; Kalim Javed; Sameena Bano; Abhijeet Dhulap; Yakub Ali; Syed Nazreen; Saqlain Haider
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular modeling studies of some novel thiazolidinediones with triazole ring.

Authors:  Yakaiah Chinthala; Anand Kumar Domatti; Alam Sarfaraz; Shailendra Pratap Singh; Niranjan Kumar Arigari; Namita Gupta; Srinivas K V N Satya; Jonnala Kotesh Kumar; Feroz Khan; Ashok K Tiwari; Grover Paramjit
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 6.514

3.  Synthesis of novel inhibitors of α-glucosidase based on the benzothiazole skeleton containing benzohydrazide moiety and their molecular docking studies.

Authors:  Muhammad Taha; Nor Hadiani Ismail; Salima Lalani; Muhammad Qaiser Fatmi; Salman Siddiqui; Khalid Mohammed Khan; Syahrul Imran; Muhammad Iqbal Choudhary
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 6.514

4.  Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 1,2,4-triazine derivatives bearing carbazole moiety as potent α-glucosidase inhibitors.

Authors:  Guangcheng Wang; Jing Wang; Dianxiong He; Xin Li; Juan Li; Zhiyun Peng
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular docking study of N-arylbenzo[d]oxazol-2-amines as potential α-glucosidase inhibitors.

Authors:  Guangcheng Wang; Zhiyun Peng; Jing Wang; Juan Li; Xin Li
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 6.  The impact of click chemistry in medicinal chemistry.

Authors:  Jingli Hou; Xifang Liu; Jie Shen; Guilong Zhao; Peng George Wang
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Discov       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.098

7.  Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 2,4,5-triarylimidazole-1,2,3-triazole derivatives via click chemistry as α-glucosidase inhibitors.

Authors:  Guangcheng Wang; Zhiyun Peng; Jing Wang; Juan Li; Xin Li
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 8.  A comprehensive review in current developments of benzothiazole-based molecules in medicinal chemistry.

Authors:  Rangappa S Keri; Mahadeo R Patil; Siddappa A Patil; Srinivasa Budagumpi
Journal:  Eur J Med Chem       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 6.514

9.  Imino sugars inhibit the formation and secretion of bovine viral diarrhea virus, a pestivirus model of hepatitis C virus: implications for the development of broad spectrum anti-hepatitis virus agents.

Authors:  N Zitzmann; A S Mehta; S Carrouée; T D Butters; F M Platt; J McCauley; B S Blumberg; R A Dwek; T M Block
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Therapeutic potential of α-glucosidase inhibitors in type 2 diabetes mellitus: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Shashank R Joshi; Eberhard Standl; Nanwei Tong; Parag Shah; Sanjay Kalra; Rahul Rathod
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.889

View more
  5 in total

1.  Exploring the therapeutic potential of benzothiazine-pyrazole hybrid molecules against alpha-glucosidase: Pharmacological and molecular modelling based approach.

Authors:  Saman Taj; Matloob Ahmad; Abdulrahman Alshammari; Abdullah Alghamdi; Usman Ali Ashfaq
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  Structural characterization, anti-inflammatory and glycosidase inhibitory activities of two new polysaccharides from the root of Pueraria lobata.

Authors:  Jiale Cai; Xiaoting Zhong; Jiayin Liang; Can Xu; Huanzheng Yu; Minghua Xian; Chunyan Yan; Shumei Wang
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 4.036

3.  The Antidiabetic Activities of Neocryptotanshinone: Screened by Molecular Docking and Related to the Modulation of PTP1B.

Authors:  Jie Hao; Zhiming Qian; Zijian Liu; Guirong Zhang; Di Wang; Weiwei Han
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-07-24       Impact factor: 6.706

4.  Rational Design of Novel Inhibitors of α-Glucosidase: An Application of Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship and Structure-Based Virtual Screening.

Authors:  Sobia Ahsan Halim; Sumaira Jabeen; Ajmal Khan; Ahmed Al-Harrasi
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19

Review 5.  In Silico Approaches to Identify Polyphenol Compounds as α-Glucosidase and α-Amylase Inhibitors against Type-II Diabetes.

Authors:  Jirawat Riyaphan; Dinh-Chuong Pham; Max K Leong; Ching-Feng Weng
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-12-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.