Literature DB >> 28913142

Day 3 embryo transfer versus day 5 blastocyst transfers: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Şafak Hatırnaz1, Mine Kanat Pektaş2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to show whether transferring day 5 embryos resulted in higher implantation and pregnancy rates than transferring day 3 embryos in Turkish women undergoing an intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 190 women who had ICSI after retrieval of more than four oocytes on the day of fertilization check were randomly assigned to undergo embryo transfer either on day 3 or day 5.
RESULTS: Day 3 and day 5 transfers were statistically similar with respect to the age of woman (p=0.107), duration of infertility (p=0.528), cause of infertility (p=0.850), number of collected oocytes (p=0.119), number of metaphase II oocytes (p=0.178), number of fertilized oocytes (p=0.092), and number of transferred embryos (p=0.556). The number of grade 1 embryos was significantly higher in day 5 transfers than in day 3 transfers (p=0.001). Day 3 and day 5 embryo transfers had statistically similar implantation, clinical pregnancy, twinning, and live birth rates (p=0.779, p=0.771, p=0.183, and p=0.649, respectively). The live birth rates in singleton pregnancies conceived after day 3 and day 5 embryo transfers were statistically similar (p=0.594).
CONCLUSION: The efficacy of blastocyst transfer is not inferior to that of embryo transfer on cleavage stage. Performing blastocyst transfer may have benefits because it is associated with acceptable pregnancy rates and morphologic assessment on day 3 has limited predictive value for subsequent embryonic development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blastocyst; embryo transfer; in vitro fertilization; intracytoplasmic sperm injection

Year:  2017        PMID: 28913142      PMCID: PMC5558418          DOI: 10.4274/tjod.99076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 2149-9330


  26 in total

1.  Single blastocyst transfer in women at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Authors:  S W Trout; M K Bohrer; D B Seifer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Sequential embryo assessment outperforms investigator-driven morphological assessment at selecting a good quality blastocyst.

Authors:  Evelyn Neuber; Neal G Mahutte; Aydin Arici; Denny Sakkas
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Prospective evaluation of the optimal time for selecting a single embryo for transfer: day 3 versus day 5.

Authors:  Nicolas H Zech; Bernard Lejeune; Francoise Puissant; Sabine Vanderzwalmen; Herbert Zech; Pierre Vanderzwalmen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  The impact of the new Turkish regulation, imposing single embryo transfer after assisted reproduction technology, on neonatal intensive care unit utilization: a single center experience.

Authors:  Nilufer Guzoglu; H Gozde Kanmaz; Dilek Dilli; Nurdan Uras; Omer Erdeve; Ugur Dilmen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  The number of eight-cell embryos is a key determinant for selecting day 3 or day 5 transfer.

Authors:  C Racowsky; K V Jackson; N A Cekleniak; J H Fox; M D Hornstein; E S Ginsburg
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 6.  Practice of embryo transfer: recommendations during and after.

Authors:  Bulent Tıras; Pinar Ozcan Cenksoy
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 1.303

7.  Embryo implantation in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: impact of cleavage status, morphology grade, and number of embryos transferred.

Authors:  M I Hsu; J Mayer; M Aronshon; S Lanzendorf; S Muasher; P Kolm; S Oehninger
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Elective single blastocyst transfer.

Authors:  Amin A Milki; Mary D Hinckley; Lynn M Westphal; Barry Behr
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Accuracy of day 3 criteria for selecting the best embryos.

Authors:  Amin A Milki; Mary D Hinckley; Janice Gebhardt; Daniel Dasig; Lynn M Westphal; Barry Behr
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  Cumulative live birth rate: time for a consensus?

Authors:  Abha Maheshwari; David McLernon; Siladitya Bhattacharya
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  2 in total

1.  Femtosecond laser is effective tool for zona pellucida engraving and tagging of preimplantation mammalian embryos.

Authors:  Inna V Ilina; Yulia V Khramova; Maxim A Filatov; Dmitry S Sitnikov
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Demián Glujovsky; Andrea Marta Quinteiro Retamar; Cristian Roberto Alvarez Sedo; Agustín Ciapponi; Simone Cornelisse; Deborah Blake
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.