Literature DB >> 26466912

Cumulative live birth rate: time for a consensus?

Abha Maheshwari1, David McLernon2, Siladitya Bhattacharya2.   

Abstract

Traditionally, IVF success rates have been reported in terms of live birth per fresh cycle or embryo transfer. With the increasing use of embryo freezing and thawing it is essential that we report not only outcomes following fresh but also those after frozen embryo transfer as a complete measure of success of an IVF treatment. Most people agree that an individual's chance of having a baby following fresh and frozen embryo transfer should be described as cumulative live birth rate. However, views on the most appropriate parameters required to calculate such an outcome have been inconsistent. There is an additional dimension-time for all frozen embryos to be used up by a couple, which can influence the outcome. Given that cumulative live birth rate is generally perceived to be the preferred reporting system in IVF, it is time to have an international consensus on how this statistic is calculated, reported and interpreted by stakeholders across the world.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IVF, ICSI; cumulative live birth rate; embryo transfer; fresh embryo transfer; frozen embryo transfer; life tables; pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26466912     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  67 in total

1.  Fertility preservation issues in pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: practical approaches from the consensus of the Pediatric Diseases Working Party of the EBMT and the International BFM Study Group.

Authors:  A Balduzzi; J-H Dalle; K Jahnukainen; M von Wolff; G Lucchini; M Ifversen; K T Macklon; C Poirot; T Diesch; A Jarisch; D Bresters; I Yaniv; B Gibson; A M Willasch; R Fadini; L Ferrari; A Lawitschka; A Ahler; N Sänger; S Corbacioglu; M Ansari; R Moffat; A Dalissier; E Beohou; P Sedlacek; A Lankester; C D De Heredia Rubio; K Vettenranta; J Wachowiak; A Yesilipek; E Trigoso; T Klingebiel; C Peters; P Bader
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  A clinical counseling tool predicting supernumerary embryos after a fresh IVF cycle.

Authors:  Yetunde Ibrahim; Greg Stoddard; Erica Johnstone
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Choice of statistical model in observational studies of ART.

Authors:  Laura E Dodge; Leslie V Farland; Katharine F B Correia; Stacey A Missmer; Emily A Seidler; Jack Wilkinson; Anna M Modest; Michele R Hacker
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Factors associated with a poor prognosis for the IVF-ICSI live birth rate in women with rAFS stage III and IV endometriosis.

Authors:  Pauline Roux; Jeanne Perrin; Julien Mancini; Aubert Agostini; Léon Boubli; Blandine Courbiere
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  IVF success corrected for drop-out: use of inverse probability weighting.

Authors:  Anna M Modest; Lauren A Wise; Matthew P Fox; Jennifer Weuve; Alan S Penzias; Michele R Hacker
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Do Strategies Favoring Frozen-thawed Embryo Transfer Have an Impact on Differences in IVF Success Rate, Multiple Pregnancy Rate, and Cost per Live Birth Between Fertility Clinics?

Authors:  Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti; Andrea Busnelli; Roberto De Luca; Giulia Scaravelli
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 3.060

7.  Comparative effectiveness of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alfa (r-hFSH-alfa) versus highly purified urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG HP) in assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments: a non-interventional study in Germany.

Authors:  Klaus F Bühler; Robert Fischer; Patrice Verpillat; Arthur Allignol; Sandra Guedes; Emmanuelle Boutmy; Wilma Bilger; Emilia Richter; Thomas D'Hooghe
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.211

8.  Cumulative live birth rate after IVF: trend over time and the impact of blastocyst culture and vitrification.

Authors:  Zoha Saket; Karin Källén; Kersti Lundin; Åsa Magnusson; Christina Bergh
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-06-29

9.  Time associations between U.S. birth rates and add-Ons to IVF practice between 2005-2016.

Authors:  Norbert Gleicher; Lyka Mochizuki; David H Barad
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Optimising Follicular Development, Pituitary Suppression, Triggering and Luteal Phase Support During Assisted Reproductive Technology: A Delphi Consensus.

Authors:  Raoul Orvieto; Christos A Venetis; Human M Fatemi; Thomas D'Hooghe; Robert Fischer; Yulia Koloda; Marcos Horton; Michael Grynberg; Salvatore Longobardi; Sandro C Esteves; Sesh K Sunkara; Yuan Li; Carlo Alviggi
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.