Literature DB >> 16500367

Sequential embryo assessment outperforms investigator-driven morphological assessment at selecting a good quality blastocyst.

Evelyn Neuber1, Neal G Mahutte, Aydin Arici, Denny Sakkas.   

Abstract

Two selection methods (morphology-only and a sequential embryo assessment algorithm) were compared within the same IVF clinic to determine which method best identifies the embryos on day 3 that will develop into the highest quality on day 5. The sequential embryo assessment algorithm was significantly better at selecting the best embryo and selecting a blastocyst compared with the morphology-only method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16500367     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  12 in total

1.  The past, present, and future of embryo selection in in vitro fertilization: Frontiers in Reproduction Conference.

Authors:  Samantha X Y Wang
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  2011-12

2.  Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Sarah Armstrong; Priya Bhide; Vanessa Jordan; Allan Pacey; Jane Marjoribanks; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-29

3.  Zygote serine decreased uptake from the fertilization medium is associated with implantation and pregnancy.

Authors:  Einat Zivi; Dinorah Barash; Einat Aizenman; Dan Gibson; Yoel Shufaro
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Maternal enzyme masks the phenotype of mouse embryos lacking dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Mark Johnson; Pa Vang; Jessica Filipovits; David Gardner
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.828

5.  A review on automatic analysis of human embryo microscope images.

Authors:  E Santos Filho; J A Noble; D Wells
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2010-10-11

Review 6.  Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Sarah Armstrong; Priya Bhide; Vanessa Jordan; Allan Pacey; Cindy Farquhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-25

7.  The Ratio of Mitochondrial DNA to Genomic DNA Copy Number in Cumulus Cell May Serve as a Biomarker of Embryo Quality in IVF Cycles.

Authors:  Seung Chel Yang; Eun Jeong Yu; Haengseok Song; Hee Jun Lee; Jae Kyun Park; Tae Hyung Kim; Jin Hee Eum; Soo Kyung Paek; Ji Young Hwang; Sang Woo Lyu; Jin Young Kim; Woo Sik Lee; Tae Ki Yoon
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 3.060

8.  Defining human embryo phenotypes by cohort-specific prognostic factors.

Authors:  Sunny H Jun; Bokyung Choi; Lora Shahine; Lynn M Westphal; Barry Behr; Renee A Reijo Pera; Wing H Wong; Mylene W M Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Non-invasive metabolomic analysis using a commercial NIR instrument for embryo selection.

Authors:  Ioannis A Sfontouris; George T Lainas; Denny Sakkas; Ioannis Z Zorzovilis; George K Petsas; Trifon G Lainas
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2013-04

Review 10.  A Review of The Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Embryo Grading System and Proposed Modification.

Authors:  Amjad Hossain; John Phelps; Ashok Agarwal; Eduardo Sanz; Maha Mahadevan
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.