| Literature DB >> 28912812 |
Heba Ashi1,2, Guglielmo Campus3,4, Heléne Bertéus Forslund5, Waleed Hafiz6, Neveen Ahmed7, Peter Lingström1,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of sweet taste perception on dietary habits in Saudi schoolchildren. In addition, the relationship between dietary habits and both caries and BMI was studied.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28912812 PMCID: PMC5585662 DOI: 10.1155/2017/4262053
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Dent ISSN: 1687-8728
Mean and standard deviation (SD) for main meal, snack, total intake, and sweet intake in Saudi schoolchildren (boys, girls).
| Variable | Boys | Girls | All |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Range | Mean ± SD | Range | Mean ± SD | Range | ||
| Main meal | 2.2 ± 0.7 | 1–3 | 2.5 ± 0.6 | 1–3 | 2.3 ± 0.7 | 1–3 | 0.003 |
| Snack | 2.2 ± 0.8 | 0–4 | 1.7 ± 0.7 | 0–3 | 1.9 ± 0.8 | 0–4 | 0.000 |
| Total intake | 4.4 ± 0.9 | 2–7 | 4.1 ± 0.8 | 3–6 | 4.2 ± 0.9 | 2–7 | 0.046 |
| Sweet intake | 2.8 ± 1.1 | 0–6 | 2.1 ± 1.4 | 0–5 | 2.4 ± 1.3 | 0–6 | 0.000 |
(1) p value: significance between boys and girls (independent t-test).
Figure 1Mean value for main meal, snack, and sweet intake in sweet taste threshold groups. n = 225.
Mean and standard deviation (SD) for main meal, snack, total intake, and sweet intake in Saudi schoolchildren according to TT (taste threshold) groups (low, medium, and high).
| Variable | Low TT | Medium TT | High TT |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Range | Mean ± SD | Range | Mean ± SD | Range | ||
| Main meal | 2.5 ± 0.6 | 1–3 | 2.2 ± 0.7 | 1–3 | 2.0 ± 0.5 | 1–3 | 0.002 |
| Snack | 1.8 ± 0.7 | 1–3 | 2.0 ± 0.9 | 0–4 | 2.4 ± 0.9 | 1–3 | 0.063 |
| Total intake | 4.3 ± 0.8 | 3–6 | 4.2 ± 1.0 | 2–7 | 4.4 ± 1.2 | 3–6 | 0.675 |
| Sweet intake | 2.0 ± 1.3 | 0–5 | 2.7 ± 1.2 | 0–6 | 2.9 ± 1.6 | 1–5 | <0.001 |
(1) p value: significance between TT groups (ANOVA).
Mean and standard deviation (SD) for main meal, snack, total intake, and sweet intake in Saudi schoolchildren according to TP (taste preference ) groups (low, medium, and high).
| Variable | Low TP | Medium TP | High TP |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Range | Mean ± SD | Range | Mean ± SD | Range | ||
| Main meal | 3.0 ± 0.0 | 1–3 | 2.7 ± 0.5 | 2-3 | 2.0 ± 0.7 | 1–3 | <0.001 |
| Snack | 1.8 ± 1.0 | 0–3 | 1.8 ± 0.6 | 1–3 | 2.1 ± 0.9 | 0–4 | 0.026 |
| Total intake | 4.8 ± 1.0 | 3–6 | 4.4 ± 0.7 | 3–6 | 4.1 ± 1.0 | 2–7 | 0.003 |
| Sweet intake | 2.4 ± 0.7 | 2–4 | 2.0 ± 1.3 | 0–5 | 2.8 ± 1.2 | 0–6 | <0.001 |
(1) p value: significance between TP groups (ANOVA).
Multiple linear regression analysis for factors associated with the beverage sweet intake score (BS).
| Variables |
| Std. error |
| Sig. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TT | .001 | .003 | .434 | .665 |
| TP | .001 | .001 | 1.402 | .162 |
| Sweet intake | .322 | .093 | 3.470 | .001 |
| Snack | .116 | .183 | .638 | .524 |
| Main meals | −.322 | .229 | −1.406 | .161 |
| Gender | .813 | .308 | 2.637 | .009 |
Mean and standard deviation (SD) for sweet taste threshold (TT), sweet taste preference (TP), BMI, initial, manifest lesions, and DMFS in Saudi schoolchildren (boys, girls).
| Variable | Boys | Girls | All |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Range | Mean ± SD | Range | Mean ± SD | Range | ||
| TT (gm/L) | 52.1 ± 58.7 | 1.6–410.8 | 22.9 ± 24.9 | 1.6–205.4 | 37.7 ± 47.5 | 1.6–410.8 | 0.000 |
| TP (gm/L) | 431.3 ± 316.3 | 1.6–821.5 | 205.1 ± 237.5 | 6.5–821.5 | 319.7 ± 302.1 | 1.6–821.5 | 0.000 |
| BMI | 25.1 ± 6.9 | 14.7–44.5 | 22.6 ± 4.8 | 12.6–37.7 | 23.9 ± 6.1 | 12.6 ± 44.5 | 0.002 |
|
| |||||||
| Initial lesions | 4.9 ± 4.6 | 0–21 | 8.6 ± 9.8 | 0–59 | 6.7–7.8 | 0–59 | 0.000 |
| Manifest lesions | 1.7 ± 3.6 | 0–24 | 0.9 ± 1.6 | 0–9 | 1.3 ± 2.8 | 0–24 | 0.025 |
| DMFS | 3.1 ± 4.5 | 0–25 | 2.9 ± 3.5 | 0–22 | 3.0 ± 4.0 | 0–25 | 0.679 |
(1) p values: significance between boys and girls (independent t-test).