| Literature DB >> 28906444 |
Annette Brandt1,2, Cheng Jun Jin3, Katja Nolte4, Cathrin Sellmann5, Anna Janina Engstler6,7, Ina Bergheim8,9.
Abstract
Intestinal microbiota and barrier functions seem to play an important role in the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, whether these changes are an early event in the development of NAFLD or are primarily associated with later stages of the disease, has not yet been clarified. Using a pair-feeding model, we determined the effects of a short-term intake of a fat-, fructose- and cholesterol-rich diet (FFC) on the development of early hepatic steatosis and markers of intestinal barrier function in mice treated with and without non-resorbable antibiotics (AB). For four days, C57BL/6J mice were either pair-fed a control diet or a FFC diet ± AB (92 mg/kg body weight (BW) polymyxin B and 216 mg/kg BW neomycin). Hepatic steatosis and markers of inflammation, lipidperoxidation and intestinal barrier function were assessed. Lipid accumulation and early signs of inflammation found in the livers of FFC-fed mice were markedly attenuated in FFC + AB-fed animals. In FFC-fed mice the development of NAFLD was associated with a significant loss of tight junction proteins and an induction of matrix metalloproteinase-13 in the upper parts of the small intestine as well as significantly higher portal endotoxin levels and an induction of dependent signaling cascades in the liver. As expected, portal endotoxin levels and the expression of dependent signaling cascades in liver tissue were almost at the level of controls in FFC + AB-fed mice. However, FFC + AB-fed mice were also protected from the loss of zonula occludens-1 and partially of occludin protein in small intestine. Our data suggest that the development of early diet-induced hepatic steatosis in mice at least in part results from alterations of intestinal barrier function.Entities:
Keywords: NAFLD; antibiotics; intestinal permeability; microbiota; steatosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28906444 PMCID: PMC5622773 DOI: 10.3390/nu9091013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Summary of study design. After adapting mice for 7 days to the intake of a liquid diet followed by 4 days of pretreatment with the non-resorbable antibiotics (92 mg polymyxin B/kg body weight/day and 216 mg neomycin/kg body weight/day) or vehicle (=water) added to the liquid control diet, mice (n = 6–8/group) were either fed the liquid control diet or a diet rich in fat, fructose & cholesterol (FFC) ± antibiotics for another 4 days.
Primer sequences.
| Gene | Forward (5′–3′) | Reverse (5′–3′) | Accession Number |
|---|---|---|---|
| GTA ACC CGT TGA ACC CCA TT | CCA TCC AAT CGG TAG TAG CG | NR_003278 | |
| CTT CCT CCT GAT CAG CAA CTC T | CGT GAG TTT TCC CAA AAT AAG C | NM_133904 | |
| TCT GGG CCA ACC TCA TTG GT | GAA GCT GGG GGT CCA TTG TG | NM_007988 | |
| TGG CTG TGG AGA AGC TGT GG | GTC CGA CAG CAC GAG GCT TT | NM_008361 | |
| CCA CGG CCT TCC CTA CTT CA | TGC AAG TGC ATC ATC GTT GTT C | NM_001314054 | |
| CCC CTG GAA GTT TCT CTT CAA AGT C | GAT TCT GGA ACA TTC TGT GCT GTC C | NM_010927 | |
| AGA AGT GTG ACC CAG CCC TA | GCG CAA GAA GAA TCT GTC TTT | NM_008607 | |
| TGG TCT TCC CCA AAG ACC TG | GCG GTA CAA GTA TGC CTC TG | NM_013599 | |
| CAA AAG TGG GGT GCC TTT GC | AAA TCC ACA GTG CCC CCA GA | NM_010851 | |
| CCG ATA AAA GGG GGC TGA GG | TGC TGA GAT CGA GCG TGG AC | NM_009127 | |
| ACC GGC TAC TGC TGG ACT GC | AGA GCA AGA GGG TGC CAT CG | NM_001313979 | |
| AGC CAT TGC TGC CAA CAT CA | GCT GCC TCA GCA GGG ACT TC | NM_021297 |
ACC: acetyl-CoA carboxylase; FASN: fatty acid synthase; Il: interleukin; iNOS: inducible nitric oxide synthase; MMP: matrix metalloproteinase; MyD88: myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88; TLR: toll-like receptor; SCD1: stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1; SREBP-1c: sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c.
Caloric intake, body weight gain and markers of liver health of mice fed short-term a FFC or control diet ± antibiotic treatment.
| Parameter | Groups | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | FFC | C + AB | FFC + AB | DE × ABE | ABE | DE | |
| Caloric intake [kcal/mouse/day] | 9.9 ± 0.0 | 10.3 ± 0.2 | 9.7 ± 0.0 | 9.9 ± 0.2 | NS | NS | NS |
| Body weight [g] | 19.1 ± 0.3 | 19.9 ± 0.4 | 19.5 ± 0.3 | 19.6 ± 0.3 | NS | NS | NS |
| Weight gain [g] | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | NS | NS | NS |
| Liver weight [g] | 0.9 ± 0.02 | 1.0 ± 0.02 a,c | 0.9 ± 0.01 | 1.0 ± 0.02 a,c | NS | NS | <0.05 |
| Liver:body weight ratio [%] | 4.6 ± 0.07 | 4.9 ± 0.08 a,c | 4.5 ± 0.05 | 5.0 ± 0.08 a,c | NS | NS | <0.05 |
| Plasma ALT [U/I] | 19.6 ± 2.8 | 14.0 ± 0.7 | 14.9 ± 1.0 | 15.5 ± 1.4 | NS | NS | NS |
Values are means ± standard error of means. ABE: antibiotic effect; ALT: alanine transaminase; C: control diet; C + AB: control diet and oral treatment with antibiotics; DE: diet effect; DE × ABE: interaction between diet and antibiotics; FFC: fat-, fructose- and cholesterol-rich diet; FFC + AB: fat-, fructose- and cholesterol-rich diet and oral treatment with antibiotics; NS: not significant. a p < 0.05 compared with mice fed a control diet; c p < 0.05 compared with mice fed a control diet treated with antibiotics.
Figure 2Effect of the short-term feeding of a FFC or control diet ± oral antibiotic treatment on liver. Representative pictures of (A) heamatoxylin and eosin staining (200×); (B) Oil Red O staining (200×) and (C) neutrophilic granulocytes (200×; arrows are indicators for neutrophilic granulocytes; FFC section 630×) of liver sections; (D) Evaluation of liver damage using NAS and (E) quantification of hepatic triglyceride accumulation; (F) Number of neutrophilic granulocytes in liver. ABE: antibiotic effect; C: control diet; C + AB: control diet and oral treatment with antibiotics; DE: diet effect; DE × ABE: interaction between diet and antibiotics; FFC: fat-, fructose- and cholesterol-rich diet; FFC + AB: fat-, fructose- and cholesterol-rich diet and oral treatment with antibiotics; NAS: NAFLD activity score; NS: not significant. a p < 0.05 compared with mice fed a control diet; c p < 0.05 compared with mice fed a control diet treated with antibiotics; d p < 0.05 compared with mice fed a FFC diet treated with antibiotics.
Effect of the short-term feeding of a FFC or control diet ± antibiotic treatment on markers of inflammation and lipogenesis in liver tissue.
| Parameter | Groups | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | FFC | C + AB | FFC + AB | DE × ABE | ABE | DE | |
| 100 ± 14 | 198 ± 45 | 133 ± 28 | 109 ± 14 | NS | NS | NS | |
| 100 ± 12 | 127 ± 19 c | 61.3 ± 12 | 96.4 ± 16 | NS | NS | <0.05 | |
| PAI-1 protein | 100 ± 6 | 123 ± 10 c,d | 75.1 ± 4 | 65.1 ± 13 a | NS | <0.05 | NS |
| 100 ± 20 | 182 ± 10 c | 88.0 ± 15 | 193 ± 25 c | NS | NS | <0.05 | |
| 100 ± 26 | 298 ± 59 a | 270 ± 50 a | 243 ± 40 | <0.05 | NS | NS | |
| 100 ± 24 | 146 ± 12 | 228 ± 46 | 258 ± 95 | NS | NS | NS | |
| 100 ± 21 | 429 ± 111 a,c | 109 ± 23 | 286 ± 65 a | NS | NS | <0.05 | |
Values are means ± standard error of means and are shown as % of control. ABE: antibiotic effect; ACC: acetyl-CoA carboxylase; C: control diet; C + AB: control diet and oral treatment with antibiotics; DE: diet effect; DE × ABE: interaction between diet and antibiotics; FFC: fat-, fructose- and cholesterol-rich diet; FFC + AB: fat-, fructose- and cholesterol-rich diet and oral treatment with antibiotics; FASN: fatty acid synthase; Il-1β: interleukin-1β; Il-6: interleukin-6; NS: not significant; PAI-1: plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; SCD1: stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1; SREBP-1c: sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c. a p < 0.05 compared with mice fed a control diet; c p < 0.05 compared with mice fed a control diet treated with antibiotics; d p < 0.05 compared with mice fed an FFC diet treated with antibiotics.
Figure 3Effect of the short-term feeding of a FFC or control diet ± oral antibiotic treatment on markers of TLR-4 signaling cascade and lipidperoxidation in liver tissue. (A) TLR-4 and (B) MyD88 mRNA expression in liver tissue; (C,D) Representative pictures (200×) and (E,F) densitometric analysis of iNOS and 4-HNE protein adduct staining in liver tissue. 4-HNE: 4-hydroxynonenal; ABE: antibiotic effect; C: control diet; C + AB: control diet and oral treatment with antibiotics; DE: diet effect, DE × ABE: interaction between diet and antibiotics; FFC: fat-, fructose- and cholesterol-rich diet; FFC + AB: fat-, fructose- and cholesterol-rich diet and oral treatment with antibiotics; iNOS: inducible nitric oxide synthase; MyD88: myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88; NS: not significant; TLR-4: toll-like receptor-4. a p < 0.05 compared with mice fed a control diet; c p < 0.05 compared with mice fed a control diet treated with antibiotics.
Figure 4Effect of the short-term feeding of a FFC or control diet ± oral antibiotic treatment on markers of intestinal barrier function and iNOS mRNA expression as well as 3-NT protein adducts and MMP-13 mRNA expression in small intestine. Representative pictures of (A) occludin; (B) ZO-1 and (C) 3-NT staining (400×) in small intestine and densitometric analysis of (D) occludin and (E) ZO-1 protein staining in small intestine and (F) endotoxin concentration in plasma of portal vein; (G) iNOS mRNA expression; (H) densitometric analysis of 3-NT protein adduct staining and (I) MMP-13 mRNA expression in small intestine. 3-NT: 3-nitrotyrosine; ABE: antibiotic effect; C: control diet; C + AB: control diet and oral treatment with antibiotics; DE: diet effect; DE × ABE: interaction between diet and antibiotics; FFC: fat-, fructose- and cholesterol-rich diet; FFC + AB: fat-, fructose- and cholesterol-rich diet and oral treatment with antibiotics; iNOS: inducible nitric oxide-synthase; MMP-13: matrix metalloproteinase-13; NS: not significant; ZO-1: zonula occludens-1. a p < 0.05 compared with mice fed a control diet; c p < 0.05 compared with mice fed a control diet treated with antibiotics; d p < 0.05 compared with mice fed a FFC diet treated with antibiotics.