Literature DB >> 28902577

Post-irradiation promotes susceptibility to reprogramming to pluripotent state in human fibroblasts.

Seung Bum Lee1, Sung-Hoon Han1, Min-Jung Kim1, Sehwan Shim1, Hye-Yun Shin1, Sun-Joo Lee1, Hye Won Kim1, Won-Suk Jang1, Songwon Seo2, Seongjae Jang3, Yanghee Lee3, Sunhoo Park1.   

Abstract

Ionizing radiation causes not only targeted effects in cells that have been directly irradiated but also non-targeted effects in several cell generations after initial exposure. Recent studies suggest that radiation can enrich for a population of stem cells, derived from differentiated cells, through cellular reprogramming. Here, we elucidate the effect of irradiation on reprogramming, subjected to two different responses, using an induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) model. iPSCs were generated from non-irradiated cells, directly-irradiated cells, or cells subsequently generated after initial radiation exposure. We found that direct irradiation negatively affected iPSC induction in a dose-dependent manner. However, in the post-irradiated group, after five subsequent generations, cells became increasingly sensitive to the induction of reprogramming compared to that in non-irradiated cells as observed by an increased number of Tra1-81-stained colonies as well as enhanced alkaline phosphatase and Oct4 promoter activity. Comparative analysis, based on reducing the number of defined factors utilized for reprogramming, also revealed enhanced efficiency of iPSC generation in post-irradiated cells. Furthermore, the phenotypic acquisition of characteristics of pluripotent stem cells was observed in all resulting iPSC lines, as shown by morphology, the expression of pluripotent markers, DNA methylation patterns of pluripotency genes, a normal diploid karyotype, and teratoma formation. Overall, these results suggested that reprogramming capability might be differentially modulated by altered radiation-induced responses. Our findings provide that susceptibility to reprogramming in somatic cells might be improved by the delayed effects of non-targeted response, and contribute to a better understanding of the biological effects of radiation exposure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  induced pluripotent stem cells; non-targeted effects; pluripotency reprogramming; post-irradiation; targeted irradiation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28902577      PMCID: PMC5731415          DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2017.1371887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  34 in total

Review 1.  Is there a common mechanism underlying genomic instability, bystander effects and other nontargeted effects of exposure to ionizing radiation?

Authors:  William F Morgan
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2003-10-13       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 2.  The triumph of chemically enhanced cellular reprogramming: a patent review.

Authors:  Muhammad Ayaz Anwar; Songmee Kim; Sangdun Choi
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Pat       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 6.674

3.  Reprogramming somatic cells to pluripotency: a fresh look at Yamanaka's model.

Authors:  Yangxin Li; Zhenya Shen; Harnath Shelat; Yong-Jian Geng
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Senescence impairs successful reprogramming to pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Ana Banito; Sheikh T Rashid; Juan Carlos Acosta; SiDe Li; Carlos F Pereira; Imbisaat Geti; Sandra Pinho; Jose C Silva; Veronique Azuara; Martin Walsh; Ludovic Vallier; Jesús Gil
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 5.  Mechanisms and models of somatic cell reprogramming.

Authors:  Yosef Buganim; Dina A Faddah; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts.

Authors:  Masato Nakagawa; Michiyo Koyanagi; Koji Tanabe; Kazutoshi Takahashi; Tomoko Ichisaka; Takashi Aoi; Keisuke Okita; Yuji Mochiduki; Nanako Takizawa; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  Are epigenetic mechanisms involved in radiation-induced bystander effects?

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Cytoplasmic irradiation induces mitochondrial-dependent 53BP1 protein relocalization in irradiated and bystander cells.

Authors:  Laurence Tartier; Stuart Gilchrist; Susanne Burdak-Rothkamm; Melvyn Folkard; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 12.701

9.  Stress-mediated p38 activation promotes somatic cell reprogramming.

Authors:  Xinxiu Xu; Quan Wang; Yuan Long; Ru Zhang; Xiaoyuan Wei; Mingzhe Xing; Haifeng Gu; Xin Xie
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 25.617

10.  Radiation-Induced Reprogramming of Pre-Senescent Mammary Epithelial Cells Enriches Putative CD44(+)/CD24(-/low) Stem Cell Phenotype.

Authors:  Xuefeng Gao; Brock J Sishc; Christopher B Nelson; Philip Hahnfeldt; Susan M Bailey; Lynn Hlatky
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.