| Literature DB >> 28902159 |
Xiaoqing Gong1, Shuting Shi2, Fangfang Dou3, Yi Song4, Fengwang Ma5.
Abstract
Since melatonin was identified in plants decades ago, much attention has been devoted to discovering its role in plant science. There is still a great deEntities:
Keywords: Malus hupehensis Rehd.; alkaline stress; antioxidant enzymes; melatonin; polyamines; root system architecture
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28902159 PMCID: PMC6151414 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22091542
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Phenotypes of Malus hupehensis Rehd. leaves in response to alkaline stress and/or melatonin treatment. C: normal growing conditions, pH 6.0–6.5, no melatonin treatment; AL: alkaline stress treatment with 2 mM Na2CO3/NaHCO3 (1:1), pH 8.5–8.8; MT: 5 µM melatonin treatment. Leaves were listed clockwise from youngest to oldest.
Effects of 5 μM melatonin treatment on growth of Malus hupehensis Rehd. seedlings under alkaline stress.
| Shoot Height (M ± SD, cm) | Leaf Number (M ± SD) | Stem Diameter (M ± SD, mm) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 Day | 15 Days | Relative Growth | 0 Day | 15 Days | Relative Growth | 0 Day | 15 Days | Relative Growth | |
| 10.77 ± 0.23 bc (100%) | 13.02 ± 0.28 a (100%) | 20.9% | 10.67 ± 0.35 c (100%) | 13.87 ± 0.19 a (100%) | 30.0% | 1.88 ± 0.04 b (100%) | 2.13 ± 0.04 a (100%) | 13.3% | |
| 10.45 ± 0.30 c (97.0%) | 11.57 ± 0.27 b (88.7%) | 10.7% | 10.67 ± 0.35 c (100%) | 12.20 ± 0.24 b (88.0%) | 14.3% | 1.88 ± 0.03 b (100%) | 1.90 ± 0.05 b (87.3%) | 1.6% | |
| 10.97 ± 0.48 bc (100%) | 13.15 ± 0.32 a (100%) | 19.9% | 11.33 ± 0.33 c (100%) | 13.93 ± 0.21 a (100%) | 23.0% | 1.90 ± 0.07 b (100%) | 2.16 ± 0.04 a (100%) | 13.7% | |
| 10.95 ± 0.39 bc (99.8%) | 13.09 ± 0.43 a (99.5%) | 19.5% | 11.20 ± 0.47 c (98.9%) | 13.80 ± 0.17 a (99.1%) | 23.2% | 1.89 ± 0.04 b (99.5%) | 2.11 ± 0.03 a (97.7%) | 11.6% | |
All data are means ± SD of 20 seedlings. The percentages in parentheses after the SD means the data in AL group versus in C group, and in AL + MT group versus in C + MT group. Letters indicate significant difference according to the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Effects of 5 μM melatonin treatment on tissue fresh weights (FW, g) measured from Malus hupehensis Rehd. seedlings under alkaline stress.
| Root (M ± SD) | Stem (M ± SD) | Leaf (M ± SD) | Total (M ± SD) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 Day | 15 Days | Relative Growth | 0 Day | 15 Days | Relative Growth | 0 Day | 15 Days | Relative Growth | 0 Day | 15 Days | Relative Growth | |
| 0.5018 ± 0.0248 b (100%) | 0.8124 ± 0.03 a (100%) | 61.9% | 0.2486 ± 0.0097 c (100%) | 0.3382 ± 0.0159 ab (100%) | 36.0% | 0.7468 ± 0.0332 c (100%) | 1.2612 ± 0.0523 ab (100%) | 68.9% | 1.4972 (100%) | 2.4118 (100%) | 61.1% | |
| 0.5091 ± 0.0364 b (101.5%) | 0.5794 ± 0.0119 b (71.3%) | 13.8% | 0.2429 ± 0.0145 c (97.7%) | 0.2460 ± 0.0127 c (72.7%) | 1.3% | 0.7401 ± 0.0491 c (99.1%) | 0.8650 ± 0.0278 c (68.6%) | 16.9% | 1.4921 (99.7%) | 1.6903 (70.1%) | 13.3% | |
| 0.5329 ± 0.0302 b (100%) | 0.8571 ± 0.0234 a (100%) | 60.8% | 0.2581 ± 0.0201 c (100%) | 0.3538 ± 0.0124 a (100%) | 37.1% | 0.7830 ± 0.0470 c (100%) | 1.3722 ± 0.0629 a (100%) | 75.2% | 1.5740 (100%) | 2.5831 (100%) | 64.1% | |
| 0.5431 ± 0.0385 b (101.9%) | 0.8337 ± 0.0225 a (97.3%) | 53.5% | 0.2538 ± 0.0182 c (98.3%) | 0.3048 ± 0.0043 b (86.2%) | 20.1% | 0.7939 ± 0.0502 c (101.4%) | 1.1581 ± 0.0296 b (84.4%) | 45.9% | 1.5906 (101.1%) | 2.2966 (88.9%) | 44.4% | |
All data are means ± SD of 20 seedlings. The percentages in parentheses after the SD means the data in AL group versus in C group, and in AL + MT group versus in C + MT group. Letters indicate significant difference according to the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Effects of 5 μM melatonin treatment on tissue dry weights (DW, g) measured from Malus hupehensis Rehd. seedlings under alkaline stress.
| Root (M ± SD) | Stem (M ± SD) | Leaf (M ± SD) | Total (M ± SD) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 Day | 15 Days | Relative Growth | 0 Day | 15 Days | Relative Growth | 0 Day | 15 Days | Relative Growth | 0 Day | 15 Days | Relative Growth | |
| 0.1175 ± 0.005 b (100%) | 0.1801 ± 0.0092 a (100%) | 53.3% | 0.1042 ± 0.0035 b (100%) | 0.1265 ± 0.0067 a (100%) | 21.4% | 0.2488 ± 0.0118 b (100%) | 0.3950 ± 0.0192 a (100%) | 58.8% | 0.4705 (100%) | 0.7017 (100%) | 49.1% | |
| 0.1163 ± 0.007 b (99.0%) | 0.1360 ± 0.0043 b (75.5%) | 16.9% | 0.1036 ± 0.0060 b (99.4%) | 0.0989 ± 0.0047 b (78.2%) | −5.5% | 0.2404 ± 0.0159 b (96.6%) | 0.2792 ± 0.0092 b (70.1%) | 16.1% | 0.4603 (97.8%) | 0.5141 (73.3%) | 11.7% | |
| 0.1150 ± 0.007 b (100%) | 0.1908 ± 0.0083 a (100%) | 65.9% | 0.1032 ± 0.0077 b (100%) | 0.1427 ± 0.0066 a (100%) | 38.3% | 0.2544 ± 0.0177 b (100%) | 0.3974 ± 0.0109 a (100%) | 56.2% | 0.4726 (100%) | 0.7309 (100%) | 54.7% | |
| 0.1160 ± 0.008 b (100.9%) | 0.1796 ± 0.0047 a (94.1%) | 54.8% | 0.1060 ± 0.0074 b (102.7%) | 0.1257 ± 0.0022 a (88.1%) | 18.6% | 0.2568 ± 0.0204 b (100.9%) | 0.3579 ± 0.0070 a (90.1%) | 39.4% | 0.4787 (101.3%) | 0.6631 (90.7%) | 38.5% | |
All data are means ± SD of 20 seedlings. The percentages in parentheses after the SD means the data in AL group versus in C group, and in AL + MT group versus in C + MT group. Letters indicate significant difference according to the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Chlorophyll (chl) concentrations in Malus hupehensis Rehd. seedlings in response to alkaline stress and/or melatonin treatment. Lower-case letters indicate significant differences among treatments, based on Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Effects of alkaline stress and melatonin treatment on relative electrolyte leakage (REL) in leaves (A), stems (B), and roots (C) from Malus hupehensis Rehd. seedlings. Lower-case letters indicate significant differences among treatments, based on Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Effects of 5 μM melatonin treatment on root growth from Malus hupehensis Rehd. seedlings under alkaline stress.
| Length (cm) | Surface Area (cm2) | Avg. Diam (mm) | Root Volume (cm3) | No. of Tips * | No. of Forks * | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 244.30 ± 14.93 a (100%) | 31.63 ± 2.25 ab (100%) | 0.44 ± 0.02 ab (100%) | 0.36 ± 0.04 ab (100%) | 1577 ± 155 ab (100%) | 2275 ± 144 ab (100%) | |
| 220.46 ± 12.94 a (90.2%) | 27.13 ± 1.69 b (85.8%) | 0.38 ± 0.01 b (86.4%) | 0.29 ± 0.02 b (80.6%) | 1179 ± 100 b (74.8%) | 2002 ± 140 b (88.0%) | |
| 267.66 ± 21.53 a (100%) | 35.75 ± 1.36 a (100%) | 0.50 ± 0.02 a (100%) | 0.45 ± 0.01 ab (100%) | 1944 ± 186 a (100%) | 2956 ± 301 a (100%) | |
| 241.41 ± 20.45 a (90.2%) | 31.96 ± 2.21 ab (89.4%) | 0.43 ± 0.03 ab (86.0%) | 0.46 ± 0.07 a (102.2%) | 1822 ± 196 a (93.7%) | 2773 ± 253 ab (93.8%) |
* The number of tips and forks is a measure of the branchiness of the fine root system, much more number of tips and forks means easier uptake of water and nutrients through the fine roots. All data are means ± SD of 10 seedlings. The percentages in parentheses after the SD means the data in AL group versus in C group, and in AL + MT group versus in C + MT group. Letters indicate significant difference according to the Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Changes in root activity for Malus hupehensis Rehd. seedlings exposed to alkaline stress, with or without melatonin treatment. (A) Absorbing roots were stained with triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) at the end of the treatment period; (B) TTC reductive intensity detected in roots. Lower-case letters indicate significant differences among treatments, based on Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Figure 5Accumulations of malondialdehyde (MDA) (A), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (B), and superoxide anion (O2−) (C) in Malus hupehensis Rehd. seedlings exposed to alkaline stress, with or without melatonin treatment. The accumulation of O2− was indicated by anti- O2− activity, which was negatively correlated with the accumulation of O2−. Lower-case letters indicate significant differences among treatments, based on Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Figure 6Activities of antioxidant enzymes in Malus hupehensis Rehd. seedlings in response to alkaline stress and/or melatonin treatment. (A) Superoxide dismutase (SOD); (B) Peroxidase III (POD); (C) Catalase (CAT). Lower-case letters indicate significant differences among treatments, based on Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Figure 7Accumulations of free polyamines (PAs) in Malus hupehensis Rehd. seedlings in response to alkaline stress and/or melatonin treatment. (A) Putrescine (Put); (B) Spermidine (Spd); (C) Spermine (Spm); (D) Accumulation of total free PAs. Lower-case letters indicate significant differences among treatments, based on Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).
Figure 8Expression of genes involved in biosynthesis of polyamines in Malus hupehensis Rehd. seedlings in response to alkaline stress and/or melatonin treatment. Expression levels were calculated relative to expression of MDH. All data are means ± SD of four replicates, and lower-case a and b indicate significant differences among treatments, based on Duncan’s multiple range test (p < 0.05).