Literature DB >> 25058012

Identification of differentially expressed genes in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) under saline-alkaline stress by digital gene expression.

Ying Yu1, Wengong Huang2, Hongyu Chen3, Guangwen Wu2, Hongmei Yuan1, Xixia Song2, Qinghua Kang2, Dongsheng Zhao2, Weidong Jiang2, Yan Liu2, Jianzhong Wu2, Lili Cheng2, Yubo Yao2, Fengzhi Guan4.   

Abstract

The salinization and alkalization of soil are widespread environmental problems, and alkaline salt stress is more destructive than neutral salt stress. Therefore, understanding the mechanism of plant tolerance to saline-alkaline stress has become a major challenge. However, little attention has been paid to the mechanism of plant alkaline salt tolerance. In this study, gene expression profiling of flax was analyzed under alkaline-salt stress (AS2), neutral salt stress (NSS) and alkaline stress (AS) by digital gene expression. Three-week-old flax seedlings were placed in 25 mM Na2CO3 (pH11.6) (AS2), 50mM NaCl (NSS) and NaOH (pH11.6) (AS) for 18 h. There were 7736, 1566 and 454 differentially expressed genes in AS2, NSS and AS compared to CK, respectively. The GO category gene enrichment analysis revealed that photosynthesis was particularly affected in AS2, carbohydrate metabolism was particularly affected in NSS, and the response to biotic stimulus was particularly affected in AS. We also analyzed the expression pattern of five categories of genes including transcription factors, signaling transduction proteins, phytohormones, reactive oxygen species proteins and transporters under these three stresses. Some key regulatory gene families involved in abiotic stress, such as WRKY, MAPKKK, ABA, PrxR and ion channels, were differentially expressed. Compared with NSS and AS, AS2 triggered more differentially expressed genes and special pathways, indicating that the mechanism of AS2 was more complex than NSS and AS. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first transcriptome analysis of flax in response to saline-alkaline stress. These data indicate that common and diverse features of saline-alkaline stress provide novel insights into the molecular mechanisms of plant saline-alkaline tolerance and offer a number of candidate genes as potential markers of tolerance to saline-alkaline stress.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digital gene expression; Flax (Linum usitatissimum); Saline–alkaline stress; Transcriptome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25058012     DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2014.07.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gene        ISSN: 0378-1119            Impact factor:   3.688


  19 in total

1.  Transcriptome-based gene expression profiling identifies differentially expressed genes critical for salt stress response in radish (Raphanus sativus L.).

Authors:  Xiaochuan Sun; Liang Xu; Yan Wang; Xiaobo Luo; Xianwen Zhu; Karanja Benard Kinuthia; Shanshan Nie; Haiyang Feng; Chao Li; Liwang Liu
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.570

2.  Gene expression profiling of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) under edaphic stress.

Authors:  Alexey A Dmitriev; Anna V Kudryavtseva; George S Krasnov; Nadezhda V Koroban; Anna S Speranskaya; Anastasia A Krinitsina; Maxim S Belenikin; Anastasiya V Snezhkina; Asiya F Sadritdinova; Natalya V Kishlyan; Tatiana A Rozhmina; Olga Yu Yurkevich; Olga V Muravenko; Nadezhda L Bolsheva; Nataliya V Melnikova
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.215

3.  Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the WRKY transcription factor family in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.).

Authors:  Hongmei Yuan; Wendong Guo; Lijuan Zhao; Ying Yu; Si Chen; Lei Tao; Lili Cheng; Qinghua Kang; Xixia Song; Jianzhong Wu; Yubo Yao; Wengong Huang; Ying Wu; Yan Liu; Xue Yang; Guangwen Wu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Identification of differentially expressed genes related to aphid resistance in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.).

Authors:  Danna Liang; Min Liu; Qijing Hu; Min He; Xiaohua Qi; Qiang Xu; Fucai Zhou; Xuehao Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Transcriptional responses of a bicarbonate-tolerant monocot, Puccinellia tenuiflora, and a related bicarbonate-sensitive species, Poa annua, to NaHCO3 stress.

Authors:  Shio Kobayashi; Hina Satone; Engkong Tan; Hiroyuki Kurokochi; Shuichi Asakawa; Shenkui Liu; Tetsuo Takano
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Transcriptomic Analysis for Different Sex Types of Ricinus communis L. during Development from Apical Buds to Inflorescences by Digital Gene Expression Profiling.

Authors:  Meilian Tan; Jianfeng Xue; Lei Wang; Jiaxiang Huang; Chunling Fu; Xingchu Yan
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 5.753

7.  Identification and characterization of miRNAs and targets in flax (Linum usitatissimum) under saline, alkaline, and saline-alkaline stresses.

Authors:  Ying Yu; Guangwen Wu; Hongmei Yuan; Lili Cheng; Dongsheng Zhao; Wengong Huang; Shuquan Zhang; Liguo Zhang; Hongyu Chen; Jian Zhang; Fengzhi Guan
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 4.215

8.  Differential gene expression in response to Fusarium oxysporum infection in resistant and susceptible genotypes of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.).

Authors:  Alexey A Dmitriev; George S Krasnov; Tatiana A Rozhmina; Roman O Novakovskiy; Anastasiya V Snezhkina; Maria S Fedorova; Olga Yu Yurkevich; Olga V Muravenko; Nadezhda L Bolsheva; Anna V Kudryavtseva; Nataliya V Melnikova
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 4.215

9.  Textile Hemp vs. Salinity: Insights from a Targeted Gene Expression Analysis.

Authors:  Gea Guerriero; Marc Behr; Jean-Francois Hausman; Sylvain Legay
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Physiological and Transcriptomic Responses of Chinese Cabbage (Brassica rapa L. ssp. Pekinensis) to Salt Stress.

Authors:  Nianwei Qiu; Qian Liu; Jingjuan Li; Yihui Zhang; Fengde Wang; Jianwei Gao
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.