Literature DB >> 36245665

A Machine Learning Model for Predicting Mortality within 90 Days of Dialysis Initiation.

Summer Rankin1, Lucy Han1, Rebecca Scherzer2, Susan Tenney1, Matthew Keating1, Kimberly Genberg1, Matthew Rahn3, Kenneth Wilkins4, Michael Shlipak2, Michelle Estrella2.   

Abstract

Background: The first 90 days after dialysis initiation are associated with high morbidity and mortality in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients. A machine learning-based tool for predicting mortality could inform patient-clinician shared decision making on whether to initiate dialysis or pursue medical management. We used the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm to predict mortality in the first 90 days after dialysis initiation in a nationally representative population from the United States Renal Data System.
Methods: A cohort of adults initiating dialysis between 2008-2017 were studied for outcome of death within 90 days of dialysis initiation. The study dataset included 188 candidate predictors prognostic of early mortality that were known on or before the first day of dialysis and was partitioned into training (70%) and testing (30%) subsets. XGBoost modeling used a complete-case set and a dataset obtained from multiple imputation. Model performance was evaluated by c-statistics overall and stratified by subgroups of age, sex, race, and dialysis modality.
Results: The analysis included 1,150,195 patients with ESKD, of whom 86,083 (8%) died in the first 90 days after dialysis initiation. The XGBoost models discriminated mortality risk in the nonimputed (c=0.826, 95% CI, 0.823 to 0.828) and imputed (c=0.827, 95% CI, 0.823 to 0.827) models and performed well across nearly every subgroup (race, age, sex, and dialysis modality) evaluated (c>0.75). Across predicted risk thresholds of 10%-50%, higher risk thresholds showed declining sensitivity (0.69-0.04) with improving specificity (0.79-0.99); similarly, positive likelihood ratio was highest at the 40% threshold, whereas the negative likelihood ratio was lowest at the 10% threshold. After calibration using isotonic regression, the model accurately estimated the probability of mortality across all ranges of predicted risk. Conclusions: The XGBoost-based model developed in this study discriminated risk of early mortality after dialysis initiation with excellent calibration and performed well across key subgroups.
Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ESRD; United States Renal Data System; chronic kidney failure; chronic renal failure; dialysis; end stage kidney disease; machine learning; mortality; outcomes; prediction modeling

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36245665      PMCID: PMC9528387          DOI: 10.34067/KID.0007012021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney360        ISSN: 2641-7650


  26 in total

1.  Early outcomes among those initiating chronic dialysis in the United States.

Authors:  Kevin E Chan; Frank W Maddux; Nina Tolkoff-Rubin; S Ananth Karumanchi; Ravi Thadhani; Raymond M Hakim
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  A clinical score to predict 6-month prognosis in elderly patients starting dialysis for end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Cécile Couchoud; Michel Labeeuw; Olivier Moranne; Vincent Allot; Vincent Esnault; Luc Frimat; Bénédicte Stengel
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 5.992

3.  Prediction of early death in end-stage renal disease patients starting dialysis.

Authors:  B J Barrett; P S Parfrey; J Morgan; P Barré; A Fine; M B Goldstein; S P Handa; K K Jindal; C M Kjellstrand; A Levin; H Mandin; N Muirhead; R M Richardson
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  Early mortality in patients starting dialysis appears to go unregistered.

Authors:  Robert N Foley; Shu-Cheng Chen; Craig A Solid; David T Gilbertson; Allan J Collins
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 10.612

5.  Predicting six-month mortality for patients who are on maintenance hemodialysis.

Authors:  Lewis M Cohen; Robin Ruthazer; Alvin H Moss; Michael J Germain
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Advance prediction of early death in patients starting maintenance dialysis.

Authors:  R N Foley; P S Parfrey; D Hefferton; I Singh; A Simms; B J Barrett
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 8.860

7.  Care Practices for Patients With Advanced Kidney Disease Who Forgo Maintenance Dialysis.

Authors:  Susan P Y Wong; Lynne V McFarland; Chuan-Fen Liu; Ryan J Laundry; Paul L Hebert; Ann M O'Hare
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Development and validation of a predictive mortality risk score from a European hemodialysis cohort.

Authors:  Jürgen Floege; Iain A Gillespie; Florian Kronenberg; Stefan D Anker; Ioanna Gioni; Sharon Richards; Ronald L Pisoni; Bruce M Robinson; Daniele Marcelli; Marc Froissart; Kai-Uwe Eckardt
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Machine learning for the prediction of volume responsiveness in patients with oliguric acute kidney injury in critical care.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Kwok M Ho; Yucai Hong
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Machine Learning to Identify Dialysis Patients at High Death Risk.

Authors:  Oguz Akbilgic; Yoshitsugu Obi; Praveen K Potukuchi; Ibrahim Karabayir; Danh V Nguyen; Melissa Soohoo; Elani Streja; Miklos Z Molnar; Connie M Rhee; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Csaba P Kovesdy
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2019-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.