Literature DB >> 28900886

The effect of obesity on laparoscopic and robotic-assisted colorectal surgery outcomes: an ACS-NSQIP database analysis.

Jeffrey N Harr1, Ivy N Haskins1, Richard L Amdur1, Samir Agarwal2, Vincent Obias3.   

Abstract

Advantages of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery have been reported, but the effect on outcomes between obese and non-obese patients undergoing laparoscopic and robotic-assisted colorectal surgery remains unclear. Patients who underwent elective laparoscopic and robotic colon or rectal resections between 2012 and 2014 were identified in the ACS-NSQIP database. Propensity score matching was performed to determine the effect of obesity on laparoscopic and robotic-assisted 30-day surgical outcomes. 29,172 patients met inclusion criteria; 27,693 (94.9%) underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery while 1479 (5.1%) underwent robotic-assisted surgery. Mean BMI was 28.4 kg/m2 and 35% of patients had a BMI ≥30 kg/m2. A 10-to-1 propensity matching of laparoscopic to robotic approaches was performed, resulting in 14,770 (90.9%) laparoscopic patients and 1477 (9.1%) robotic-assisted patients available for analysis. Robotic-assisted surgery was associated with lower conversion to laparotomy (2.4 vs 3.4%; p = 0.04) and decreased length-of-stay (4.5±3.2 vs 5.1±4.5 days; p < 0.0001). After adjusting for BMI and surgical approach, obese patients undergoing robotic-assisted surgery had a reduced odds ratio for developing prolonged ileus (p = 0.03). Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery is associated with fewer conversions to laparotomy and shorter length-of-stays compared to laparoscopic surgery. Risk of prolonged ileus is significantly reduced in obese patients undergoing a robotic-assisted approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body mass index; Laparoscopic colorectal surgery; Laparotomy conversion rate; Obesity; Robotic colorectal surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28900886     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-017-0736-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  33 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  N S Abraham; J M Young; M J Solomon
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era.

Authors:  Joshua A Tyler; Justin P Fox; Mayur M Desai; W Brian Perry; Sean C Glasgow
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Effect of body mass index on short-term outcomes after colectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Ryan P Merkow; Karl Y Bilimoria; Martin D McCarter; David J Bentrem
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial.

Authors:  Peter J Hewett; Randall A Allardyce; Philip F Bagshaw; Christopher M Frampton; Francis A Frizelle; Nicholas A Rieger; J Shona Smith; Michael J Solomon; Jacqueline H Stephens; Andrew R L Stevenson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Impact of obesity on short-term results of laparoscopic rectal cancer resection.

Authors:  Thierry Bège; Bernard Lelong; Daniel Francon; Olivier Turrini; Jérome Guiramand; Jean-Robert Delpero
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  A case-control study of risk factors for wound infection in a colorectal unit.

Authors:  K Power; M M Davies; R Hargest; S Phillips; J Torkington; C Morris
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.891

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The Current Role of Robotics in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Harith H Mushtaq; Shinil K Shah; Amit K Agarwal
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2019-03-06

2.  State of the art in robotic rectal surgery: marginal gains worth the pain?

Authors:  Irfan Nasir; Amro Mureb; Chukwuebuka C Aliozo; Mohamed H Abunada; Amjad Parvaiz
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-03-06

Review 3.  Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad Fahd Shah; Irfan Ul Islam Nasir; Amjad Parvaiz
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2019-05-15

Review 4.  Minimally Invasive Management of Diverticular Disease.

Authors:  Andrea Madiedo; Jason Hall
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-02-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.