Literature DB >> 33675509

State of the art in robotic rectal surgery: marginal gains worth the pain?

Irfan Nasir1, Amro Mureb2, Chukwuebuka C Aliozo2, Mohamed H Abunada3, Amjad Parvaiz4,5.   

Abstract

After their first introduction in the 1990s to overcome the limitations of conventional laparoscopic surgery, especially in confined spaces such as the pelvis, telemanipulators (i.e., master-slave manipulators) have gained popularity and acceptance among gastrointestinal surgeons. These complex, interventional surgical devices use multiple technologies, such as 3-D advanced imaging, tremor reduction and 7-degree movement. Superior instrument dexterity, stable precise vision and accessibility to narrow confined spaces make these devices well suited for colorectal surgery. The drive for innovations in the field of surgical robotics will leverage novel robots driven by data, image integration, and artificial intelligence. However, if this vision is to be realized, lessons must be learned from the current literature and clinical trials. The feasibility and safety of robotic rectal surgery is now well established; increasing evidence suggests that when compared to laparoscopic rectal surgery, robotic approaches might offer superior peri-operative outcomes. Notably, the marginal gains achieved with the use of robotics in rectal cancer surgery are linked with structured training and standardization of operative techniques. With decreasing costs and wider availability of new systems, it is foreseeable that robotic surgical systems will be an integral part of colorectal practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal surgery; Rectal surgery; Robotic surgery

Year:  2021        PMID: 33675509     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00965-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  9 in total

1.  Totally robotic rectal resection: an experience of the first 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  J Ahmed; M Nasir; K Flashman; J Khan; A Parvaiz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Laparoscopic vs. robotic rectal cancer surgery and the effect on conversion rates: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched studies.

Authors:  K Phan; H R Kahlaee; S H Kim; J W T Toh
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  A survey of robotic surgery training curricula in general surgery residency programs: How close are we to a standardized curriculum?

Authors:  Cynthia M Tom; James D Maciel; Abraham Korn; Junko J Ozao-Choy; Danielle M Hari; Angela L Neville; Christian de Virgilio; Christine Dauphine
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery.

Authors:  Jeong Yeon Kim; Nam-Kyu Kim; Kang Young Lee; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Jang Hwan Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Next-generation robotics in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  James M Kinross; Sam E Mason; George Mylonas; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Annibale D'Annibale; Graziano Pernazza; Igor Monsellato; Vito Pende; Giorgio Lucandri; Paolo Mazzocchi; Giovanni Alfano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  The short-term outcomes of robotic sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: comparison with open and laparoscopic surgery using a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Soichiro Ishihara; Tomomichi Kiyomatsu; Kazushige Kawai; Toshiaki Tanaka; Keisuke Hata; Shinsuke Kazama; Eiji Sunami; Hiroaki Nozawa; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  The effect of obesity on laparoscopic and robotic-assisted colorectal surgery outcomes: an ACS-NSQIP database analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey N Harr; Ivy N Haskins; Richard L Amdur; Samir Agarwal; Vincent Obias
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-09-12

9.  Urogenital function in robotic vs laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a comparative study.

Authors:  Sofoklis Panteleimonitis; Jamil Ahmed; Meghana Ramachandra; Muhammad Farooq; Mick Harper; Amjad Parvaiz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.571

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.