Harith H Mushtaq1, Shinil K Shah2, Amit K Agarwal3. 1. General Surgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 4.331, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. 2. Minimally Invasive and Elective General Surgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 4.156, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. 3. Colon and Rectal Surgery, McGovern Medical School at UT Health, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 4.158, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. Amit.k.agarwal@uth.tmc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite the growth in laparoscopic surgery, comparable oncological outcomes, and reduced complication rates, the majority of colorectal surgery is still performed via an open approach. Reasons for this may include technical difficulties associated with operating in narrow spaces such as in the pelvis and inadequate experience. Robotic surgery provides potential solutions to some of these challenges. This review will summarize the state of the literature regarding robotic colorectal surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: The most consistent benefit of robotic surgery is decreasing operative conversions, specifically in rectal cancer. In partial colectomies, there is evidence to support quicker return to bowel function. Oncologic outcomes compared to the laparoscopic approach are equivalent. Robotic surgery provides solutions to the challenges posed by laparoscopy, including wristed instruments, ease of intracorporeal suturing, and ergonomic advantages. Randomized trials to evaluate peri-operative outcomes will be important. If robotics is able to facilitate conversion of open colectomies to their minimally invasive equivalent, robotics may end up proving to be advantageous in the peri-operative and post-operative period. Continued studies are warranted.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite the growth in laparoscopic surgery, comparable oncological outcomes, and reduced complication rates, the majority of colorectal surgery is still performed via an open approach. Reasons for this may include technical difficulties associated with operating in narrow spaces such as in the pelvis and inadequate experience. Robotic surgery provides potential solutions to some of these challenges. This review will summarize the state of the literature regarding robotic colorectal surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: The most consistent benefit of robotic surgery is decreasing operative conversions, specifically in rectal cancer. In partial colectomies, there is evidence to support quicker return to bowel function. Oncologic outcomes compared to the laparoscopic approach are equivalent. Robotic surgery provides solutions to the challenges posed by laparoscopy, including wristed instruments, ease of intracorporeal suturing, and ergonomic advantages. Randomized trials to evaluate peri-operative outcomes will be important. If robotics is able to facilitate conversion of open colectomies to their minimally invasive equivalent, robotics may end up proving to be advantageous in the peri-operative and post-operative period. Continued studies are warranted.
Authors: Wissam J Halabi; Celeste Y Kang; Mehraneh D Jafari; Vinh Q Nguyen; Joseph C Carmichael; Steven Mills; Michael J Stamos; Alessio Pigazzi Journal: World J Surg Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Jeroen Heemskerk; Dominique E N M de Hoog; Wim G van Gemert; Cor G M I Baeten; Jan Willem M Greve; Nicole D Bouvy Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Hazim Hakmi; Leo Amodu; Patrizio Petrone; Shahidul Islam; Amir H Sohail; Michael Bourgoin; Toyooki Sonoda; Collin E M Brathwaite Journal: JSLS Date: 2022 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 1.789