Literature DB >> 28899680

The cephalic phase insulin response to nutritive and low-calorie sweeteners in solid and beverage form.

Jaapna Dhillon1, Janice Y Lee2, Richard D Mattes3.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to examine the role of the cephalic phase insulin response (CPIR) following exposure to nutritive and low-calorie sweeteners in solid and beverage form in overweight and obese adults. In addition, the role of learning on the CPIR to nutritive and low-calorie sweetener exposure was tested. Sixty-four overweight and obese adults (age: 18-50years, BMI: 24-37kg/m2, body fat percentage>25% for men and >32% for women) were sham-fed (at 2-minute intervals for 14min) a randomly assigned test load comprised of a nutritive (sucrose) or low-calorie sweetener (sucralose) in beverage or solid form in phase 1 of the study. A 2-3ml blood sample was collected before and 2, 6, 10, 14, 61, 91 and 121min after oral exposure for serum insulin and glucose analysis. During phase 2, participants underwent a 2-week training period to facilitate associative learning between the sensory properties of test loads and their post-ingestive effects. In phase 3, participants were retested for their cephalic phase responses as in phase 1. Participants were classified as responders if they demonstrated a positive insulin response (rise of serum insulin above baseline i.e. Δ insulin) 2min post-stimulus in phase 1. Among responders exposed to the same sweetener in Phases 1 and 3, the proportion of participants that displayed a rise of insulin with oral exposure to sucralose was significantly greater when the stimulus was in the solid form compared to the beverage form. Sucralose and sucrose exposure elicited similarly significant increases in serum insulin 2min after exposure and significant decreases after 2min in responders in both food forms. The solid food form elicited greater CPIR over 2, 6 and 10min than the beverage form. There was no effect of learning on insulin responses after training. The results indicate the presence of a significant CPIR in a subset of individuals with overweight or obesity after oral exposure to sucralose, especially when present in solid food form. Future studies must confirm the reliability of this response.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cephalic phase; Food form; Insulin response; Learning; Low-calorie sweeteners; Obesity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28899680      PMCID: PMC5634742          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.09.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  95 in total

Review 1.  Food intake and the regulation of body weight.

Authors:  S C Woods; M W Schwartz; D G Baskin; R J Seeley
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 24.137

2.  Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids.

Authors:  Paula Trumbo; Sandra Schlicker; Allison A Yates; Mary Poos
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2002-11

3.  Multimodal function of the sweet taste receptor expressed in pancreatic β-cells: generation of diverse patterns of intracellular signals by sweet agonists.

Authors:  Yuko Nakagawa; Masahiro Nagasawa; Hideo Mogami; Martin Lohse; Yuzo Ninomiya; Itaru Kojima
Journal:  Endocr J       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 2.349

4.  Glycemic effect of a single high oral dose of the novel sweetener sucralose in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  N H Mezitis; C A Maggio; P Koch; A Quddoos; D B Allison; F X Pi-Sunyer
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Ontogeny of cephalic insulin release by the rat.

Authors:  I L Bernstein; S C Woods
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1980-03

Review 6.  Mind over metabolism: the cephalic phase in relation to non-insulin-dependent diabetes and obesity.

Authors:  L H Storlien; D G Bruce
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.251

7.  Characterization of the Binding Site of Aspartame in the Human Sweet Taste Receptor.

Authors:  Emeline L Maillet; Meng Cui; Peihua Jiang; Mihaly Mezei; Elizabeth Hecht; Jeniffer Quijada; Robert F Margolskee; Roman Osman; Marianna Max
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.160

8.  Salivation and insulin secretion in response to food in non-obese men and women.

Authors:  B J Sahakian; M E Lean; T W Robbins; W P James
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 3.868

9.  Possible entrainment of ghrelin to habitual meal patterns in humans.

Authors:  Julie M Frecka; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.052

Review 10.  Functional roles of the sweet taste receptor in oral and extraoral tissues.

Authors:  Anni Laffitte; Fabrice Neiers; Loïc Briand
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.294

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  An alternative pathway for sweet sensation: possible mechanisms and physiological relevance.

Authors:  Elena von Molitor; Katja Riedel; Michael Krohn; Rüdiger Rudolf; Mathias Hafner; Tiziana Cesetti
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 2.  Cephalic phase insulin release: A review of its mechanistic basis and variability in humans.

Authors:  Alexa J Pullicin; John I Glendinning; Juyun Lim
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2021-07-09

3.  How oro-sensory exposure and eating rate affect satiation and associated endocrine responses-a randomized trial.

Authors:  Marlou Lasschuijt; Monica Mars; Cees de Graaf; Paul A M Smeets
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Exacting Responses: Lack of Endocrine Cephalic Phase Responses Upon Oro-Sensory Exposure.

Authors:  Marlou P Lasschuijt; Monica Mars; Cees de Graaf; Paul A M Smeets
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.555

5.  Interoceptive accuracy moderates the response to a glucose load: a test of the predictive coding framework.

Authors:  Hayley A Young; Chantelle M Gaylor; Danielle de Kerckhove; Heather Watkins; David Benton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Effects of Oro-Sensory Exposure on Satiation and Underlying Neurophysiological Mechanisms-What Do We Know So Far?

Authors:  Marlou P Lasschuijt; Kees de Graaf; Monica Mars
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 7.  Low Calorie Sweeteners Differ in Their Physiological Effects in Humans.

Authors:  Stephanie R Hunter; Evan J Reister; Eunjin Cheon; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-11-09       Impact factor: 5.717

8.  Chronic sucralose consumption induces elevation of serum insulin in young healthy adults: a randomized, double blind, controlled trial.

Authors:  Nallely Bueno-Hernández; Marcela Esquivel-Velázquez; Raúl Alcántara-Suárez; Angélica Y Gómez-Arauz; Aranza J Espinosa-Flores; Karen L de León-Barrera; Viridiana M Mendoza-Martínez; Gabriela A Sánchez Medina; Mireya León-Hernández; Alejandra Ruiz-Barranco; Galileo Escobedo; Guillermo Meléndez
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.271

9.  Endocrine Cephalic Phase Responses to Food Cues: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marlou P Lasschuijt; Monica Mars; Cees de Graaf; Paul A M Smeets
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 10.  The Effect of Artificial Sweeteners Use on Sweet Taste Perception and Weight Loss Efficacy: A Review.

Authors:  Klara Wilk; Wiktoria Korytek; Marta Pelczyńska; Małgorzata Moszak; Paweł Bogdański
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.