Literature DB >> 28894765

Active phantoms: a paradigm for ultrasound calibration using phantom feedback.

Alexis Cheng1, Xiaoyu Guo2, Haichong K Zhang1, Hyun Jae Kang1, Ralph Etienne-Cummings2, Emad M Boctor1,2,3.   

Abstract

In ultrasound (US)-guided medical procedures, accurate tracking of interventional tools is crucial to patient safety and clinical outcome. This requires a calibration procedure to recover the relationship between the US image and the tracking coordinate system. In literature, calibration has been performed on passive phantoms, which depend on image quality and parameters, such as frequency, depth, and beam-thickness as well as in-plane assumptions. In this work, we introduce an active phantom for US calibration. This phantom actively detects and responds to the US beams transmitted from the imaging probe. This active echo (AE) approach allows identification of the US image midplane independent of image quality. Both target localization and segmentation can be done automatically, minimizing user dependency. The AE phantom is compared with a crosswire phantom in a robotic US setup. An out-of-plane estimation US calibration method is also demonstrated through simulation and experiments to compensate for remaining elevational uncertainty. The results indicate that the AE calibration phantom can have more consistent results across experiments with varying image configurations. Automatic segmentation is also shown to have similar performance to manual segmentation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active sensors; image guidance; ultrasound calibration; ultrasound imaging

Year:  2017        PMID: 28894765      PMCID: PMC5531213          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.035001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  13 in total

1.  Test object for measurement of section thickness at US.

Authors:  B Richard
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  A motion constrained cross-wire phantom for tracked 2D ultrasound calibration.

Authors:  Eivind Lyche Melvaer; Knut Mørken; Eigil Samset
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Estimation of ultrasound beam width in the elevation (section thickness) plane.

Authors:  M L Skolnick
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Robot-assisted automatic ultrasound calibration.

Authors:  Fereshteh Aalamifar; Alexis Cheng; Younsu Kim; Xiao Hu; Haichong K Zhang; Xiaoyu Guo; Emad M Boctor
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 5.  A review of calibration techniques for freehand 3-D ultrasound systems.

Authors:  Laurence Mercier; Thomas Langø; Frank Lindseth; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Real-time freehand 3D ultrasound calibration.

Authors:  Po-Wei Hsu; Richard W Prager; Andrew H Gee; Graham M Treece
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Electromagnetic tracking for image-guided abdominal procedures: overall system and technical issues.

Authors:  Kevin Cleary; Hui Zhang; Neil Glossop; Elliot Levy; Bradford Wood; Filip Banovac
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2005

8.  Rapid calibration for 3-D freehand ultrasound.

Authors:  R W Prager; R N Rohling; A H Gee; L Berman
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Improvement of freehand ultrasound calibration accuracy using the elevation beamwidth profile.

Authors:  Thomas Kuiran Chen; Randy E Ellis; Purang Abolmaesumi
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Active echo: a new paradigm for ultrasound calibration.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Guo; Alexis Cheng; Haichong K Zhang; Hyun-Jae Kang; Ralph Etienne-Cummings; Emad M Boctor
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2014
View more
  1 in total

1.  Phantom with multiple active points for ultrasound calibration.

Authors:  Haichong K Zhang; Alexis Cheng; Younsu Kim; Qianli Ma; Gregory S Chirikjian; Emad M Boctor
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-11-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.