Literature DB >> 28893926

Limited Contribution of Primary Motor Cortex in Eye-Hand Coordination: A TMS Study.

James Mathew1, Alexandre Eusebio1,2, Frederic Danion3.   

Abstract

The ability to track a moving target with the eye is substantially improved when the target is self-moved compared with when it is moved by an external agent. To account for this observation, it has been postulated that the oculomotor system has access to hand efference copy, thereby allowing to predict the motion of the visual target. Along this scheme, we tested the effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the hand area of the primary motor cortex (M1) when human participants (50% females) are asked to track with their eyes a visual target whose horizontal motion is driven by their grip force. We reasoned that, if the output of M1 is used by the oculomotor system to keep track of the target, on top of inducing short latency disturbance of grip force, single-pulse TMS should also quickly disrupt ongoing eye motion. For comparison purposes, the effect of TMS over M1 was monitored when subjects tracked an externally moved target (while keeping their hand at rest or not). In both cases, results showed no alterations in smooth pursuit, meaning that its velocity was unaffected within the 25-125 ms epoch that followed TMS. Overall, our results imply that the output of M1 has limited contribution in driving the eye motion during our eye-hand coordination task. This study suggests that, if hand motor signals are accessed by the oculomotor system, this is upstream of M1.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The ability to coordinate eye and hand actions is central in everyday activity. However, the neural mechanisms underlying this coordination remain to be clarified. A leading hypothesis is that the oculomotor system has access to hand motor signals. Here we explored this possibility by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the hand area of the primary motor cortex (M1) when humans tracked with the eyes a visual target that was moved by the hand. As expected, ongoing hand action was perturbed 25-30 ms after TMS, but our results fail to show any disruption of eye motion, smooth pursuit velocity being unaffected. This work suggests that, if hand motor signals are accessed by the oculomotor system, this is upstream of M1.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/379730-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TMS; efference copy; eye tracking; eye-hand coordination; prediction; primary motor cortex; smooth pursuit

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28893926      PMCID: PMC6596613          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0564-17.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  53 in total

Review 1.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity.

Authors:  S M Pincus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Similarity in the response of smooth pursuit and manual tracking to a change in the direction of target motion.

Authors:  K C Engel; J H Anderson; J F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Does the oculo-manual co-ordination control system use an internal model of the arm dynamics?

Authors:  K Scarchilli; J L Vercher; G M Gauthier; J Cole
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1999-04-16       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  A ticklish question: does magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex give rise to an 'efference copy'?

Authors:  Edward P Chronicle; Jane Glover
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  A real-time state predictor in motor control: study of saccadic eye movements during unseen reaching movements.

Authors:  Gregory Ariff; Opher Donchin; Thrishantha Nanayakkara; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Finger interactions studied with transcranial magnetic stimulation during multi-finger force production tasks.

Authors:  Frédéric Danion; Mark L Latash; Sheng Li
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Role of sensory information in updating internal models of the effector during arm tracking.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vercher; Frédéric Sarès; Jean Blouin; Christophe Bourdin; Gabriel Gauthier
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.453

9.  Interactions between ocular motor and manual responses during two-dimensional tracking.

Authors:  Kevin C Engel; John F Soechting
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.453

10.  Forward models in visuomotor control.

Authors:  Biren Mehta; Stefan Schaal
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  5 in total

1.  Morphologic Variants of the Hand Motor Cortex in Developing Brains from Neonates through Childhood Assessed by MR Imaging.

Authors:  F Wu; H Zhao; Y Zhang; M Wang; C Liu; X Wang; Y Cheng; C Jin; J Yang; X Li
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Sensory attenuation from action observation.

Authors:  Mark Scott
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Asymmetrical Relationship between Prediction and Control during Visuomotor Adaptation.

Authors:  James Mathew; Pierre-Michel Bernier; Frederic R Danion
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-12-14

4.  Handedness Matters for Motor Control But Not for Prediction.

Authors:  James Mathew; Fabrice R Sarlegna; Pierre-Michel Bernier; Frederic R Danion
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-06-06

5.  Ups and downs in catch-up saccades following single-pulse TMS-methodological considerations.

Authors:  James Mathew; Frederic R Danion
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.