Literature DB >> 10979990

Similarity in the response of smooth pursuit and manual tracking to a change in the direction of target motion.

K C Engel1, J H Anderson, J F Soechting.   

Abstract

Subjects were asked to track, with their eyes or their hand, the movement of a target that maintained a constant speed and made a single, abrupt change in direction. The tracking speed and direction of motion after the step change in target direction were compared for the eyes and the hand. After removal of the saccades from the eye movement records, it was found that in both cases, there was a slow rotation from the initial direction to the new direction. For the eyes and the hand, it was found that this change in direction of movement occurred at a similar rate that was proportional to the magnitude of the abrupt change in target direction. This was further described by comparing the direction of pursuit tracking with the response of a second-order system to a step input. In addition, it was found that the speed of manual and pursuit tracking was modulated in a similar manner, with a reduction in tracking speed occurring before the change in tracking direction. This reduction in speed following the change in the direction of target motion was very similar for the hand and the eye, despite the large difference in the inertias of the two systems. Taken together, these data suggest that the neural mechanisms for smooth pursuit and manual tracking have common functional elements and that musculoskeletal dynamics do not appear to be a rate-limiting factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10979990     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.3.1149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  20 in total

1.  Geometric computations underlying eye-hand coordination: orientations of the two eyes and the head.

Authors:  D Y P Henriques; W P Medendorp; C C A M Gielen; J D Crawford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Smooth pursuit tracking of an abrupt change in target direction: vector superposition of discrete responses.

Authors:  John F Soechting; Leigh A Mrotek; Martha Flanders
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Manual tracking enhances smooth pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Diederick C Niehorster; Wilfred W F Siu; Li Li
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Different damping responses explain vertical endpoint error differences between visual conditions.

Authors:  Jan M Hondzinski; Chelsea M Soebbing; Allyson E French; Sara A Winges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Cortical afferents to the smooth-pursuit region of the macaque monkey's frontal eye field.

Authors:  Gregory B Stanton; Harriet R Friedman; Elisa C Dias; Charles J Bruce
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Allocentric cues do not always improve whole body reaching performance.

Authors:  Jan M Hondzinski; Yongqin Cui
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Oculomotor responses to gradual changes in target direction.

Authors:  Leigh A Mrotek; Martha Flanders; John F Soechting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Pursuit eye movements involve a covert motor plan for manual tracking.

Authors:  Claudio Maioli; Luca Falciati; Tiziana Gianesini
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The influence of motion signals in hand movements.

Authors:  Borja Rodríguez-Herreros; Joan López-Moliner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Influence of visually guided tracking arm movements on single cell activity in area MT.

Authors:  Sabine Dannenberg; Marc Alwin Gieselmann; Wolfgang Kruse; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.