Literature DB >> 12693259

Interactions between ocular motor and manual responses during two-dimensional tracking.

Kevin C Engel1, John F Soechting.   

Abstract

Tracking of a moving target usually involves coordinated movements of the eye and the hand. To study the extent to which one behavior influences the other, eye and hand movements were recorded during three conditions (eye alone, hand alone, and eye and hand together) where subjects tracked a target that initially moved in a straight line and then made an abrupt and unpredictable change in direction. The response latencies of the eye and hand were influenced by the presence of the other tracking modality. More specifically, the latency for the hand was decreased during concomitant ocular tracking, whereas the latency for the eye was increased during combined hand-eye tracking. Moreover, the velocity profile of the smooth pursuit component of ocular tracking was different when the hand also tracked the target. Taken together, these observations support the hypothesis that at least part of the neural substrate underlying tracking is shared by the two modalities.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12693259     DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(03)42011-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  21 in total

1.  Interception of targets using brief directional cues.

Authors:  Leigh A Mrotek; Martha Flanders; John F Soechting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Smooth pursuit tracking of an abrupt change in target direction: vector superposition of discrete responses.

Authors:  John F Soechting; Leigh A Mrotek; Martha Flanders
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Interactions between lateralized choices of hand and target.

Authors:  Jennifer Gardinier; Vanessa Franco; Marc H Schieber
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Allocentric cues do not always improve whole body reaching performance.

Authors:  Jan M Hondzinski; Yongqin Cui
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Oculomotor responses to gradual changes in target direction.

Authors:  Leigh A Mrotek; Martha Flanders; John F Soechting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The role of eye movements in visuo-manual adaptation.

Authors:  V Grigorova; O Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Predicting curvilinear target motion through an occlusion.

Authors:  Leigh A Mrotek; John F Soechting
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Pursuit eye movements involve a covert motor plan for manual tracking.

Authors:  Claudio Maioli; Luca Falciati; Tiziana Gianesini
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Adaptations of lateral hand movements to early and late visual occlusion in catching.

Authors:  Joost C Dessing; Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes; C Lieke E Peper; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The impact of head direction on lateralized choices of target and hand.

Authors:  Numa Dancause; Marc H Schieber
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.