| Literature DB >> 28892468 |
Ran Tian1, Lei-Nan Zhang1, Ting-Ting Zhang2, Hai-Yu Pang3, Lian-Feng Chen1, Zhu-Jun Shen1, Zhenyu Liu1, Quan Fang1, Shu-Yang Zhang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Leukocyte telomere length (LTL) is regarded as a potential marker of biological aging. Oxidative stress plays a major role in the rate of telomeric DNA loss. The aim of this study was to explore whether the LTL was shorter in Chinese patients with premature coronary artery disease (PCAD) than in non-CAD controls and to determine the relationship between oxidative stress and LTL shortening in this population. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients for coronary angiography were recruited. In total, 128 patients with PCAD and 128 non-CAD controls were enrolled. Samples of circulating leukocytes and plasma were collected. The mean LTL was measured using a polymerase chain reaction-based assay and expressed as the ratio of telomere repeat copies to single-copy gene (SCG) copies (T/S ratio). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and total antioxidant capacity (T-AOC) were determined in plasma. RESULTS Both the T/S ratio (0.88±0.86 vs. 1.10±0.57, P=0.015) and telomere base pairs (4.97±1.37 kb vs. 5.32±0.91 kb, P=0.015) were significantly shorter in the PCAD group than in non-CAD controls. The T-AOC levels of the PCAD group were significantly lower than those of the non-CAD controls (0.482 mM [0.279, 0.603 mM]) vs. 0.778 mM [0.421, 0.924 mM], P=0.000). The ratio of T-AOC to ROS in the PCAD patients was significantly decreased compared to that of the non-CAD controls (0.1026±0. 1587 [Mm*ml/ng] vs. 0.1435±0.1946 [Mm*ml/ng], P=0.013). CONCLUSIONS The results point to a potential link between reduced LTLs in patients with PCAD and early onset of atherosclerosis. The decline in antioxidant capacity may play an important role in accelerating the attrition of telomeres in PCAD patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28892468 PMCID: PMC5604488 DOI: 10.12659/msm.902106
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Clinical characteristics of controls and patients with PCAD.
| Clinical characteristics | Controls (n=128) | PCAD patients (n=128) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 48.5 (7.33) | 48.6 (7.26) | 0.539 |
| Male (%) | 74 (57.8%) | 74 (57.8%) | 1.000 |
| BMI(kg/m2) | 24.0 (2.95) | 26.2 (3.23) | |
| ALT (U/L) | 19.7 (14,23) | 36.0 (18, 40.75) | |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 73.5 (11.9) | 72.2 (21.6) | 0.550 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 5.04 (1.73) | 5.48 (1.92) | 0.063 |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 5.75 (1.21) | 6.12 (1.77) | 0.060 |
| HbA1C (%) | 5.87 (1.26) | 6.21 (1.40) | 0.152 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.24 (1.90) | 4.68 (1.06) | |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.10 (0.9, 1.36) | 1.98 (1.19, 2.35) | |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.10 (0.25) | 1.00 (0.21) | |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.64 (0.67) | 2.74 (0.77) | 0.558 |
| hs-CRP (ng/mL) | 0.88 (0.45, 1.02) | 9.30 (0.74, 5.925) | |
| HTN (%) | 45 (35.2%) | 82 (64.1%) | |
| T2D (%) | 30 (23.4%) | 43 (33.6%) | 0.096 |
| Dyslipidemia (%) | 47 (36.7%) | 78 (60.9%) | |
| Family history of PCAD (%) | 29 (22.7%) | 48 (37.5%) | |
| Smoking (%) | 37 (28.9%) | 64 (50.0%) |
Data are mean ±SD, number (%) or median and IQR. The bold – significant. BMI – body mass index; ALT – alanine transaminase; BUN – blood urea nitrogen; TC – total cholesterol; TG – triglycerides; HDL-C – high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C – low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; hs-CRP – high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; HTN – hypertension; T2D – type 2 diabetes; PCAD – premature coronary artery disease.
Figure 1Linear regression analysis of the association between leukocyte telomere length (LTLs) and age (A) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, adjusted for age and sex (B) in the controls and PCAD patients. The telomere length is plotted as the T/S ratio.
Bivariate correlation for association of clinical factors and LTL.
| Clinical factors | LTL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pCAD patients | Non-CAD controls | |||
| Spearman coefficient | P value | Spearman coefficient | P value | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | −0.185 | 0.436 | −0.018 | 0.909 |
| ALT (U/L) | −0.142 | 0.551 | 0.008 | 0.958 |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 0.018 | 0.941 | −0.210 | 0.167 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | −0.146 | 0.538 | −0.280 | 0.063 |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 0.002 | 0.992 | −0.109 | 0.474 |
| HGB (g/L) | −0.197 | 0.405 | −0.194 | 0.201 |
| TC (mmol/L) | −0.069 | 0.773 | −0.132 | 0.386 |
| TG (mmol/L) | −0.051 | 0.830 | −0.267 | 0.076 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 0.224 | 0.342 | −0.209 | 0.168 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | −0.212 | 0.370 | −0.021 | 0.891 |
| hs-CRP (ng/ml) | −0.062 | 0.796 | 0.254 | 0.092 |
| HbA1C (%) | 0.027 | 0.909 | −0.116 | 0.449 |
| Gensini score | 0.087 | 0.716 | —— | —— |
| history of MI | −0.297 | 0.203 | —— | —— |
| family history of PCAD (%) | −0.371 | 0.107 | −0.039 | 0.798 |
| HTN | −0.111 | 0.642 | −0.303 | |
| dyslipidemia | −0.415 | −0.207 | 0.173 | |
| T2D | −0.472 | −0.065 | 0.669 | |
| smoking | 0.077 | 0.748 | −0.348 | |
| level of ROS (ng/ml) | −0.050 | 0.834 | −0.034 | |
| T-AOC (mM) | 0.451 | −0.161 | 0.290 | |
| T-AOC/ROS value | 0.641 | 0.122 | 0.424 | |
The bold – significant difference. LTL – leukocyte telomere length; PCAD – premature coronary artery disease; BMI – body mass index; ALT – alanine transaminase; BUN – blood urea nitrogen; HGB – hemoglobin; TC – total cholesterol; TG – triglycerides; HDL-C – high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C – low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; hs-CRP – high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; MI – myocardial infarction; HTN – hypertension; T2D – type 2 diabetes; ROS – reactive oxygen species; T-AOC – total antioxidant capacity.
Figure 2Comparison of the level of oxidative stress markers in the 2 groups. (A) T-AOC; (B) level of ROS; (C) T-AOC/ROS value. Histogram represents mean ±SD.
Figure 3The relationship between LTLs and T-AOC/ROS levels in the PCAD patients.
Multiple linear regression model for association between related factors and LTL.
| Variables | PCAD patients | Controls | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 95%CI | P | B | 95%CI | P | |
| Age (years) | −0.041 | −0.015~0.011 | 0.798 | −0.097 | −0.011~0.005 | 0.451 |
| Sex (Male=1, Female=0) | 0.150 | −0.115~0.297 | 0.385 | 0.153 | −0.038~0.185 | 0.195 |
| HTN (Yes=1, No=0) | 0.044 | −0.872~0.844 | 0.975 | −0.017 | −0.108~0.073 | 0.704 |
| Dyslipidemia (Yes=1, No=0) | −0.088 | −0.039~0.539 | 0.558 | 0.009 | −0.098~0.117 | 0.863 |
| T2D (Yes=1, No=0) | −0.219 | −0.069~−0.369 | −0.109 | −0.249~0.031 | 0.124 | |
| Smoking (Yes=1, No=0) | 0.082 | −0.206~0.369 | 0.575 | −0.093 | −0.180~−0.006 | 0.066 |
| Level of ROS (ng/ml) | −0.250 | −0.871~0.371 | 0.427 | −0.337 | −0.553~−0.120 | |
| T-AOC/ROS value | 0.273 | 0.110~0.436 | 0.002 | −0.001~0.006 | ||
The bold – significant difference. 95% CI – 95% confidence interval. Other abbreviations as in Table 2. B – values are not standardized.
Linear regression of association between clinical factors and oxidative stress.
| Oxidative stress | Variables | PCAD patients | Controls | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 95%CI | P | B | 95%CI | P | ||
| ROS | Age | 0.088 | 0.003~0.173 | 0.140 | 0.127~0.153 | ||
| Sex | −1.251 | −4.750~2.248 | 0.477 | −0.343 | −6.440~1.053 | 0.155 | |
| BMI | 0.197 | 0.012~0.382 | 0.598 | −0.020 | 0.061~0.220 | 0.825 | |
| Creatinine | −0.230 | −0.328~−0.132 | 0.087 | −0.195 | −0.397~0.007 | 0.158 | |
| HGB | −0.197 | −0.206~−0.188 | 0.375 | −0.268 | −0.331~−0.205 | 0.097 | |
| hs-CRP | 0.213 | −0.017~0.443 | 0.306 | 0.104~0.508 | 0.324 | ||
| MI | 0.219 | 0.165~0.273 | 0.112 | — | — | — | |
| T-AOC | Age | −0.013 | −0.022~−0.004 | −0.052 | −0.107~0.003 | 0.561 | |
| Sex | −0.096 | −0.275~0.084 | 0.292 | 0.106 | −0.195~0.448 | 0.438 | |
| Glucose | −0.009 | −0.425~0.407 | 0.925 | −0.206 | −0.278~−0.134 | 0.689 | |
| LDL-C | −0.088 | −0.168~−0.007 | −0.067 | −0.089~−0.045 | 0.459 | ||
| HDL-C | 0.181 | 0.013~0.349 | 0.768 | −0.011 | −0.783~−0.761 | 0.906 | |
| T-AOC/ROS | Age | −4.621 | −6.767~−2.475 | −0.125 | −0.283~0.035 | ||
| Sex | −0.025 | −0.051~0.001 | 0.060 | −0.033 | −0.126~0.061 | 0.487 | |
| BMI | −0.196 | −0.234~−0.158 | 0.097 | 0.071 | −0.234~−0.016 | 0.438 | |
| Creatinine | 0.141 | 0.089~0.193 | 0.113 | 0.273 | 0.078~0.465 | 0.098 | |
| HGB | 0.080 | −0.125~0.285 | 0.383 | 0.194 | 0.166~0.222 | 0.383 | |
| TC | −0.200 | −0.017~0.417 | 0.375 | −0.108 | −0.198~−0.018 | 0.521 | |
| MI | −11.346 | −17.853~4.838 | — | — | — | ||
The bold – significant difference. 95% CI – 95% confidence interval. Other abbreviations as in Table 2. B – values are not standardized.