Dominik J Kubicki1,2, Daniel Prochowicz3, Elodie Salager4,5, Aydar Rakhmatullin4, Clare P Grey2, Lyndon Emsley6, Samuel D Stranks1,7. 1. Cavendish Laboratory, Department of Physics (CB3 0HE), University of Cambridge, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, U.K. 2. Department of Chemistry (CB2 1EW), University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, U.K. 3. Institute of Physical Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kasprzaka 44/52, 01-224 Warsaw, Poland. 4. Conditions Extrêmes et Matériaux: Haute Température et Irradiation (CEMHTI), UPR 3079 CNRS, Université d'Orléans, 1D Avenue de la Recherche Scientifique, Orléans 45071, France. 5. Réseau sur le Stockage Electrochimique de l'Energie (RS2E), FR 3459 CNRS, 33 Rue Saint Leu, Amiens 80039, France. 6. Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, Institute of Chemical Sciences and Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. 7. Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology (CB3 0AS), University of Cambridge, Philippa Fawcett Drive, Cambridge, U.K.
Abstract
Organic-inorganic tin(II) halide perovskites have emerged as promising alternatives to lead halide perovskites in optoelectronic applications. While they suffer from considerably poorer performance and stability in comparison to their lead analogues, their performance improvements have so far largely been driven by trial and error efforts due to a critical lack of methods to probe their atomic-level microstructure. Here, we identify the challenges and devise a 119Sn solid-state NMR protocol for the determination of the local structure of mixed-cation and mixed-halide tin(II) halide perovskites as well as their degradation products and related phases. We establish that the longitudinal relaxation of 119Sn can span 6 orders of magnitude in this class of compounds, which makes judicious choice of experimental NMR parameters essential for the reliable detection of various phases. We show that Cl/Br and I/Br mixed-halide perovskites form solid alloys in any ratio, while only limited mixing is possible for I/Cl compositions. We elucidate the degradation pathways of Cs-, MA-, and FA-based tin(II) halides and show that degradation leads to highly disordered, qualitatively similar products, regardless of the A-site cation and halide. We detect the presence of metallic tin among the degradation products, which we suggest could contribute to the previously reported high conductivities in tin(II) halide perovskites. 119Sn NMR chemical shifts are a sensitive probe of the halide coordination environment as well as of the A-site cation composition. Finally, we use variable-temperature multifield relaxation measurements to quantify ion dynamics in MASnBr3 and establish activation energies for motion and show that this motion leads to spontaneous halide homogenization at room temperature whenever two different pure-halide perovskites are put in physical contact.
Organic-inorganictin(II) halide perovskites have emerged as promising alternatives to lead halide perovskites in optoelectronic applications. While they suffer from considerably poorer performance and stability in comparison to their lead analogues, their performance improvements have so far largely been driven by trial and error efforts due to a critical lack of methods to probe their atomic-level microstructure. Here, we identify the challenges and devise a 119Sn solid-state NMR protocol for the determination of the local structure of mixed-cation and mixed-halidetin(II) halide perovskites as well as their degradation products and related phases. We establish that the longitudinal relaxation of 119Sn can span 6 orders of magnitude in this class of compounds, which makes judicious choice of experimental NMR parameters essential for the reliable detection of various phases. We show that Cl/Br and I/Br mixed-halide perovskites form solid alloys in any ratio, while only limited mixing is possible for I/Cl compositions. We elucidate the degradation pathways of Cs-, MA-, and FA-based tin(II) halides and show that degradation leads to highly disordered, qualitatively similar products, regardless of the A-site cation and halide. We detect the presence of metallic tin among the degradation products, which we suggest could contribute to the previously reported high conductivities in tin(II) halide perovskites. 119Sn NMR chemical shifts are a sensitive probe of the halide coordination environment as well as of the A-site cation composition. Finally, we use variable-temperature multifield relaxation measurements to quantify ion dynamics in MASnBr3 and establish activation energies for motion and show that this motion leads to spontaneous halide homogenization at room temperature whenever two different pure-halide perovskites are put in physical contact.
Organic–inorganichalide perovskites (OIHPs) have emerged
as a new class of materials for solar cells and light emission applications
owing to the ease of solution processing, immunity to most defects,
and long charge carrier lifetimes, which can be tuned by compositional
engineering.[1,2] Following the first report of
perovskite-based solar cells (PSC) a decade ago,[3] the field of perovskite-based photovoltaics has been developing
at a very fast pace, now reaching power conversion efficiencies of
over 25%.[1,4,5]OIHPs
are represented by the generic ABX3 formula, in
which A is typically a small cation such as methylammonium (CH3NH3+, MA), formamidinium (CH3(NH2)2+, FA), and/or cesium ions.
The inorganic sublattice is composed of [BX6]4– octahedra, where B is a divalent metal such as Pb2+,
Sn2+, and Ge2+ or a mixture of monovalent and
trivalent metals (e.g., Ag+ and In3+) and X
is a halide: I–, Br–, or Cl–. Lead halide perovskites exhibit considerably higher
ambient stability and optoelectronic performance[6,7] in
comparison to the tin- and germanium-based analogues;[8,9] hence, many of the solar cells with record efficiency are based
on Pb2+.[4,10,11] Tin-based materials (Figure ), while providing lower band gaps than their lead analogues,
essential for tandem solar cells, suffer from easy oxidation and disproportionation
which lead to self-doping, very short charge carrier lifetimes, and
in turn poor power conversion efficiencies. These undesirable processes
have been mitigated by introducing antioxidant additives such as SnF2,[12] hydrazine,[13] hydrazinium,[14,15] β-tin,[16] the potassium salt of hydroquinonesulfonic acid
(KHQSA),[17] and ascorbic acid[18] and by A-/X-site compositional engineering,[19−23] leading to efficiencies approaching 10%. Iodide–chloride
mixing has been a widely investigated problem in the field of lead
halideperovskite photovoltaics, since chloride doping leads to significantly
improved thin film crystallinity and carrier diffusion lengths,[24−27] and considerable improvements have also been reported for chloride
doping in tin(II) halide perovskite based solar cells.[28,29] However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no direct evidence
for I/Cl mixing in the case of tin(II) halide perovskites.
Figure 1
Schematic representation
of the crystal structure of tin(II) halide
perovskites formed by corner-sharing [SnX6]4– octahedra.
Schematic representation
of the crystal structure of tin(II) halideperovskites formed by corner-sharing [SnX6]4– octahedra.Another strategy to stabilize
tin(II)-based materials is the use
of mixed-metaltin(II)-lead(II)halide perovskites, which combine
the advantageous optoelectronic properties of lead-based materials
while providing band gaps of 1.2–1.3 eV which are close to
the optimum required for all-perovskite tandem solar cells.[30−34]The resulting materials are typically probed using diffraction-based
methods, which provide information about long-range order, and optical
spectroscopy to characterize their electronic properties. However,
the atomic-level effect of various additives have not yet been evaluated,
since there are currently no robust protocols for probing the local
structure of multicomponent tin(II) halide perovskites. Rapid degradation
of tin(II) halide perovskites has been consistently observed in device
studies,[35−37] and degradation mechanisms have been investigated
using XRD, TGA, and UV–vis spectroscopy. However, once again,
the atomic-level mechanism of degradation and the exact identity of
the resulting species remain elusive.Solid-state NMR has recently
been shown to be the method of choice
to determine local structure and dynamics in lead halide perovskites,
which are uniquely amenable owing to the atomic-level and element-specific
resolution of NMR.[38] In particular, solid-state
NMR can be used to evidence A-/B-site cation incorporation,[39−45] halide mixing,[46−49] and doping-induced phase segregation processe,[40,41,43,46] and to study
interfacial passivation mechanisms,[50−52] cation and anion dynamics,[39,53−59] and degradation processes.[60] The local
structure of tinhalide perovskites has been previously investigated
in CsSnBr3,[61] MASnI3,[62] and FASnI3[62] using pair distribution function (PDF) analysis. Given
the prevalence of tin NMR studies of other groups of materials, it
is surprising that it has not yet been applied to tin(II) halide perovskites.
We show that this problem is not trivial. To the best of our knowledge,
the only example of applying solid-state MAS NMR to tinhalide perovskites
to date is a 1H MAS NMR study of cation mixing in FA1–MASnBr3.[63] Solid-state 207Pb
NMR has recently provided an abundance of atomic-level information
on lead halide perovskites,[46−48,60] and hence it is expected that tin NMR should be well suited to study
tin analogues as well as mixed tin-lead materials.Tin has three
NMR-active isotopes, 115Sn, 117Sn, and 119Sn, with natural abundances of 0.3%, 7.7%,
and 8.6%, respectively. All three isotopes have spinI = 1/2 and similar gyromagnetic ratios, which render 119Sn the most receptive of the three, with a receptivity ca. 27 times
that of 13C. Solid-state tin NMR has been widely employed
to study organotin compounds,[64] crystalline
oxides and stannates,[65,66] porous networks,[67−69] sulfides,[70,71] nitrides,[72] and all-inorganic semiconductors.[73−75] Tin NMR is
particularly sensitive to the difference between the +2[76,77] and +4[78] oxidation states with the corresponding
chemical shift differences on the order of several hundreds of ppm,
as well as to the type of atom covalently bound to the tin site. 119Sn chemical shifts span the range between 1000 and −2000
ppm for diamagnetic compounds and 7000–8000 ppm for tin metal.[79] Much larger ranges of shifts are seen for paramagnetic
compounds.[66]Here, we probe the atomic-level
microstructure of single- and mixed-halide
(I, Br, Cl) tin(II) halide perovskites, single and mixed A-site cation
(Cs, MA, FA) tin(II) halide perovskites, and tin(IV) non-perovskite
phases using 119Sn MAS NMR spectroscopy. We show that iodide–bromide
and bromide–chloride mixtures form solid solutions for any
I/Br and Br/Cl ratio. On the other hand, iodide–chloride compositions,
while partially miscible, yield phase-segregated mixtures of phases.
We show how 119Sn MAS NMR can be applied to study degradation
pathways of tin(II) halide perovskites and that degradation typically
leads to highly disordered SnO2 and halostannates(IV).
We have also detected traces of metallic tin in the degraded material.
Three of the degradation products, FA2SnI6,
MA2SnI6, and Cs2SnI6 have 119Sn chemical shifts of −4818, −4684, and −4518
ppm, respectively, values unprecedented in their magnitude for diamagnetic
tin compounds. Further, we show that 119Sn longitudinal
relaxation times (T1) in this class of
compounds can span 6 orders of magnitude, which makes the use of optimized
experimental parameters essential for the reliable detection of various
phases. Finally, we use variable-temperature multi-field 119Sn MAS NMR to quantify halide dynamics in MASnBr3 and
show that it leads to spontaneous halide mixing at room temperature.
The materials were prepared
using mechanosynthesis[80,81] following recently published
protocols.[82−84] The precursors were stored under argon. The halostannates
were synthesized by grinding the reactants in an electric ball mill
(Retsch MM-400) using an agate grinding jar (10 mL) and ball (⌀
10 mm) for 30 min at 25 Hz. XRD patterns, SEM images, and optical
data of mechanochemical tin(II) halide perovskites have been previously
reported[82,83] and agree with those recorded on materials
prepared as single crystals and thin films. The quantities of reagents
used in the synthesis are given in the Supporting Information.
NMR Measurements
Solid-state MAS
NMR spectra of 119Sn (74.7 MHz) were recorded on a Bruker
Avance III 4.7 T
spectrometer equipped with a 4 mm MAS probe using 167 kHz rf strength.
About 200–250 mg of material was used for each measurement,
corresponding to a full 4 mm rotor. The recycle delays were set on
the basis of the measured T1 values, as
described in the text. Low-temperature 1H–13C (125.8 MHz) CP MAS and room-temperature 14N (36.2 MHz)
experiments were recorded on a Bruker Avance III 11.7 T spectrometer
equipped with a 3.2 mm low-temperature CPMAS probe using previously
optimized parameters.[39] High-temperature 119Sn MAS NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance III
4.7 T spectrometer (74.7 MHz) using a 4 mm MAS Bruker probe (MgO stator)
in the range between 308 and 455 K using 4 mm zirconia rotors spinning
at 5 kHz with heated nitrogen. High-field data in the 308–474
K temperature range were obtained on a Bruker Avance IIIHD 17.6 T
spectrometer (279.7 MHz) using a MAS LASER probe (Bruker) with airtight
boron nitride crucibles contained in 7 mm zirconia rotors spinning
at 6 kHz. The temperature was adjusted using diode laser heating.[85] The sample was sandwiched between two layers
of ground KBr, which allowed monitoring of the effective sample temperature
through the 79Br shift of KBr.[86,87] In order to prevent any interactions between KBr and the perovskite
sample, a thin layer of PTFE tape was placed between the two powders.
Hahn echoes of 40 μs total duration were used to mitigate ringing
effects. CSA parameters were fitted using TopSpin 3.5. Further experimental
details are given in the Supporting Information.
Results and Discussion
Local Structure of Mixed-Anion Tin Halostannates
Figure shows 119Sn solid-state MAS NMR spectra of methylammonium mixed-halide
chloro-
and bromostannates(II), bromostannate(IV) as well as their tin(II)
and tin(IV) halide precursors recorded at room temperature. The 119Sn chemical shift is highly sensitive to the local environment
of the tin site and makes it possible to distinguish tin(II) precursors—SnCl2 (−916 ppm, Figure a) and SnBr2 (−640 ppm, Figure b)—from the
corresponding perovskites—MASnCl3 (−398 ppm, Figure c) and MASnBr3 (−316 ppm, Figure g). MASnCl3 exhibits successive phase transitions
at 283, 307, 331, and 463 K.[88] The structure
adopted by MASnCl3 under our experimental conditions (298
K) is monoclinic with slightly distorted [SnCl6]4– octahedra, which leads to the presence of chemical shift anisotropy
(CSA) manifesting itself as a set of spinning sidebands (SSB) spaced
by the MAS rotation frequency (Figure c). The fitted CSA parameters (δCSA −435 ppm, η = 0.26) are consistent with those previously
reported.[88] Replacing Cl– with Br– in MASnCl3 leads to solid
solutions for the full range of Cl/Br ratios studied here. Low Br– concentrations, as in MASnCl2.7Br0.3, lead to a slight broadening and the appearance of two types of
Sn(II) sites with similar CSA parameters (Figure d). The two sites correspond to different
local [SnBr6–Cl]4– environments within the same phase, where
the bromide content is higher for the environment at −351 ppm
than it is for the environment at −393 ppm. As the concentration
of Br– in the lattice is increased, the resonance
broadens further and takes on a chemical shift intermediate with respect
to MASnCl3 and MASnBr3 and its apparent CSA
becomes smaller (δCSA −364 ppm, η =
0.1 for MASnCl2.1Br0.9) (Figure e). MASnBr3 is pseudocubic at
room temperature; therefore, its δCSA value is ∼0
ppm and there are no SSBs associated with the main peak (Figure g).[36] The peak is significantly broader than those of MASnCl3 and MASnCl1.5Br1.5. We attribute these
line width variations to the interference between CSA and fast halide
hopping, as discussed further in the text below (see also Supplementary Note 1). Note that this spectrum
was acquired with no rotor synchronization in the quasi-static (νr = 600 Hz) regime (16.7 μs echo delay) due to very fast T2 relaxation. Using a rotor-synchronized echo
delay (83.3 μs) leads to lower SNR but does not lead to the
appearance of SSBs (Figure S1). Further, 119Sn NMR makes it possible to distinguish between bromostannates(II)
and -(IV). While SnBr4 (−659 ppm) is shifted only
slightly with respect to SnBr2 (−640 ppm), the difference
between MASnBr3 (−316 ppm) and MA2SnBr6 (−1990 ppm) is much more pronounced.
Figure 2
119Sn solid-state
MAS NMR spectra of mixed-anion (chloride/bromide)
halostannates and their precursors at 4.7 T, 12 kHz MAS (except for
SnBr4), and 298 K: (a) SnCl2; (b) SnBr2; (c) MASnCl3; (d) MASnCl2.7Br0.3; (e) MASnCl2.1Br0.9; (f) MASnCl1.5Br1.5; (g) MASnBr3; (h) SnBr4 (at
0.6 kHz MAS to prevent melting); (i) MA2SnBr6. † indicates trace unreacted SnCl2.
119Sn solid-state
MAS NMR spectra of mixed-anion (chloride/bromide)
halostannates and their precursors at 4.7 T, 12 kHz MAS (except for
SnBr4), and 298 K: (a) SnCl2; (b) SnBr2; (c) MASnCl3; (d) MASnCl2.7Br0.3; (e) MASnCl2.1Br0.9; (f) MASnCl1.5Br1.5; (g) MASnBr3; (h) SnBr4 (at
0.6 kHz MAS to prevent melting); (i) MA2SnBr6. † indicates trace unreacted SnCl2.In turn, we investigated iodide-containing halostannate(II)
and
-(IV) species. SnI2 (−527 ppm Figure a) exhibits a partially resolved 119Sn–127I scalar coupling, 1JSn–I = 6.2 kHz, similar in magnitude to the 207Pb–127I scalar coupling in PbI2.[89] The crystal structure of MASnI3 is pseudocubic at room temperature; hence, a symmetric peak
with δCSA ∼0 ppm is expected. However, the
material yields a very broad, slightly asymmetric resonance with T2* ≈ 10 μs (estimated from the
line width), which we attribute to very efficient scalar relaxation.
A similarly short T2* value has been previously
observed in lead iodide perovskites.[46,49,90]
Figure 3
119Sn solid-state MAS NMR spectra of mixed-anion
(iodide/chloride
and iodide/bromide) halostannates and their precursors at 4.7 T, 12
kHz MAS and 298 K: (a) SnI2; (b) MASnI3; (c)
MASnCl2.7I0.3 (the signals at 249 and −395
ppm were detected with recycle delays of 50 ms and 50 s, respectively);
(d) MASnBr0.9I2.1; (e) MASnBr1.5I1.5; (f) MASnBr2.1I0.9; (g) MASnBr2.55I0.45; (h) MASnBr2.7I0.3; (i) MASnBr3; (j) SnI4; (k) MA2SnI6. † indicates trace unreacted SnCl2.
119Sn solid-state MAS NMR spectra of mixed-anion
(iodide/chloride
and iodide/bromide) halostannates and their precursors at 4.7 T, 12
kHz MAS and 298 K: (a) SnI2; (b) MASnI3; (c)
MASnCl2.7I0.3 (the signals at 249 and −395
ppm were detected with recycle delays of 50 ms and 50 s, respectively);
(d) MASnBr0.9I2.1; (e) MASnBr1.5I1.5; (f) MASnBr2.1I0.9; (g) MASnBr2.55I0.45; (h) MASnBr2.7I0.3; (i) MASnBr3; (j) SnI4; (k) MA2SnI6. † indicates trace unreacted SnCl2.Figure c shows
two 119Sn spectra of MASnCl2.7I0.3, one obtained with a 50 ms recycle delay and the other with 50 s,
to highlight the iodide- and chloride-rich environments, respectively.
The signal corresponding to the iodide-rich phase is shifted to lower
frequencies (to lower ppm values) with respect to pure MASnI3 (Figure b), which
supports the formation of [SnI6–Cl]4– coordination
environments, thereby confirming that Cl– can incorporate
into the MASnI3perovskite lattice. On the other hand,
the signal corresponding to the chloride-rich phase is identical,
within experimental error, with that of pure MASnCl3 (Figure c), which indicates
that I– has not been incorporated into the perovskite
lattice of MASnCl3. This result can be rationalized considering
the difference in atomic radii of I– (2.2 Å)
and Cl– (1.8 Å), which cause the MASnCl3 structure to be more compact in comparison to that of MASnI3.[36,88]On the other hand, iodide–bromide
mixing has been previously
studied in polycrystalline powders using X-ray diffraction and is
expected due to the smaller difference in ionic radii of I– (2.2 Å) and Br– (2.0 Å).[36] As I– is replaced by Br– in the crystal structure of MASnI3 (Figure b), the spectrum
initially broadens and shifts to higher frequencies (to higher ppm
values) (MASnBr0.9I2.1, Figure d) and then narrows and shifts to lower frequencies
as the Br/I ratio increases further (above Br/I = 1.5/1.5, Figure e,f). Similar spectral
trends have been previously reported in 119Sn MAS NMR spectra
of other disordered solids, such as stannate pyrochlores[91] and in 207Pb MAS NMR spectra of mixed-cation
lead halide perovskites.[47,48] Here, however, we ascribe
the strong line width variation to the different magnitudes of 127I and 79/81Br-induced relaxation, as described
in the next section.The difference
in chemical shift between Sn(II) and Sn(IV) iodides
and iodostannates in even more pronounced than for bromides and bromostannates.
SnI2 (−527 ppm, Figure a) can be easily distinguished from SnI4 (−1746 ppm, Figure j), and the same is true for MASnI3 (795
ppm, Figure b) and
MA2SnI6 (−4684 ppm, Figure k). The latter 119Sn chemical shift is, to the best of our knowledge, the most
shielded tin environment reported to date for a diamagnetic tin compound. While on the basis of the high electronegativity of iodine one
might expect strong deshielding (shift at high positive ppm values),
the exact opposite is observed experimentally. This is due to the
effect of spin–orbit coupling, which is important for heavy
atoms, as has been previously shown by fully relativistic DFT calculations.[92] The 119Sn–127I
scalar coupling constant in molten SnI4 has been previously
found to be 1JSn–I =
0.9 kHz and is not resolved in the solid state.[93]
Local Structure of FA, Cs, and Mixed A-Site
Cation Tin Halostannates
The A-site cation composition, mixing,
and segregation in solid
lead halideperovskite has been previously explored directly using
solid-state 1H, 13C and 133Cs NMR
as well as indirectly using 207Pb NMR.[39−41,46,48,94] Here we show that the A-site composition in tin(II) halide perovskites
can be probed indirectly using 119Sn MAS NMR. Figure shows 119Sn MAS NMR spectra of single- and mixed-cation cesium, methylammonium,
and formamidinium tin(II) halides (I, Br, Cl). All iodides yield very
broad (full width at half-maximum (fwhm) of 70–170 kHz) and
largely featureless spectra due to very efficient scalar T2 relaxation (Figure a–c). At room temperature, MASnI3 and FASnI3 are pseudocubic,[95] while CsSnI3 is orthorhombic.[96] Whereas symmetrical resonances are expected for highly symmetric
structures, in this case the line shapes are asymmetric, which suggests
that they are not determined entirely by T2 relaxation but rather that there is another contribution to the
line shape. We believe that it is caused by the well-documented effect
that a fast-relaxing quadrupolar nucleus has on the line shape of
a spin 1/2 nucleus which is coupled to it.[97] We were able to numerically simulate the line shapes and obtained
a good qualitative agreement with the experiment (Figure S7). Overall, high-sensitivity 119Sn spectra
can be recorded for 3D tin iodide perovskite within minutes under
the experimental conditions used here and, while they are sensitive
to the halide coordination environment, their value for investigating
A-site cation mixing is limited due to the lack of spectral resolution.
Non-perovskitetin iodide phases (SnI2, SnI4, and MA2SnI6) do not suffer from this complication,
likely owing to their different crystal structures in which the efficiency
of this relaxation mechanism is reduced.
Figure 4
119Sn as a
probe of the A-site cation (Cs, MA, FA) and
A-site cation mixing in tin(II) halide perovskites. 119Sn solid-state MAS NMR spectra at 4.7 T, 12 kHz MAS (unless stated
otherwise), and 298 K of iodides: (a) MASnI3; (b) FASnI3 (static, see Figure S6 for 12
kHz MAS); (c) CsSnI3; bromides (d) CsSnBr3,
(e) MASnBr3, (f) MA0.5FA0.5SnBr3, and (g) FASnBr3; chlorides (h) MASnCl3, (i) MA0.5FA0.5SnCl3, (j) FASnCl3, and (k) CsSnCl3 (monoclinic) († indicates
the metastable cubic phase of CsPbI3, and # is likely a
second tin(II) site in the asymmetric unit cell of CsPbCl3); (l) CsSnCl3 (cubic); mixed halide (m) CsSnCl1.5Br1.5. The arrows indicate trace unreacted SnCl2.
119Sn as a
probe of the A-site cation (Cs, MA, FA) and
A-site cation mixing in tin(II) halide perovskites. 119Sn solid-state MAS NMR spectra at 4.7 T, 12 kHz MAS (unless stated
otherwise), and 298 K of iodides: (a) MASnI3; (b) FASnI3 (static, see Figure S6 for 12
kHz MAS); (c) CsSnI3; bromides (d) CsSnBr3,
(e) MASnBr3, (f) MA0.5FA0.5SnBr3, and (g) FASnBr3; chlorides (h) MASnCl3, (i) MA0.5FA0.5SnCl3, (j) FASnCl3, and (k) CsSnCl3 (monoclinic) († indicates
the metastable cubic phase of CsPbI3, and # is likely a
second tin(II) site in the asymmetric unit cell of CsPbCl3); (l) CsSnCl3 (cubic); mixed halide (m) CsSnCl1.5Br1.5. The arrows indicate trace unreacted SnCl2.On the other hand, tin(II) bromideperovskites yield well-resolved
spectra whereby the chemical shift is a sensitive fingerprint of the
A-site cation (Figure d–g): CsSnBr3 (−353 ppm), MASnBr3 (−316 ppm), FASnBr3 (−165 ppm). This makes
it possible to probe A-site cation mixing using 119Sn NMR
in the bromide systems. For example, MA0.5FA0.5SnBr3 (−244 ppm) yields a 119Sn chemical
shift which is intermediate with respect to the single A-site cation
species. This leads to a linear correlation between the MA/FA ratio
and the 119Sn chemical shift in MAFA1–SnBr3: δSn (ppm) = −151x – 166. All
four materials exist in the highest symmetry cubic α phase at
room temperature.[36,63,98] Also in this case, the line broadening was numerically simulated
and is attributed to fast quadrupolar relaxation of 79/81Br bound to 119Sn (Figure S7).Tin(II) chlorideperovskites typically exist as low-symmetry
phases
at room temperature (monoclinic and triclinic for CsSnCl3 and MASnCl3, respectively[98,99]); hence, they
yield characteristic CSA patterns (Figure h–l). Also in this case the 119Sn chemical shift is strongly dependent on the type of the A-site
cation and an additional constraint is provided by the observed (298
K) CSA parameters: MASnCl3 (δiso −398
ppm, δCSA −435 ppm, η = 0.26), FASnCl3 (δiso −347 ppm, δCSA −508 ppm, η = 0.06), CsSnCl3 (δiso −296 ppm, δCSA −568 ppm,
η = 0.14). The spectrum of FASnCl3 contains a second
peak at δiso −479 ppm (δCSA −401 ppm, η = 0.08), which likely corresponds to a
second tin(II) site inside the asymmetric unit cell, analogous to
the situation observed in the low-symmetry phase of MASnCl3.[88] A-site cation mixing leads to disorder,
which is exemplified by the spectrum of MA0.5FA0.5SnCl3: the resonances broaden considerably and the two
broad components (FA, δiso −343, δCSA −510 ppm, η = 0.01; MA, δiso −379 ppm, δCSA −353 ppm, η
= 0.12) take on values intermediate with respect to the single-cation
phases. CsSnCl3 can be trapped in its high-symmetry cubic
phase (δiso −561 ppm, δCSA ∼0 ppm) at room temperature if the sample is briefly heated
to 380 K (Figure l).
This phase is metastable and can be transformed back to the low-symmetry
phase in the presence of humidity.[98] Finally,
we note that 119Sn can be used to study the halide coordination
environment in tin(II) halides perovskites not only when the A site
is an organic cation (Figures and 3) but also when it is an inorganic
cation such as cesium. Figure m shows that the 119Sn chemical shift of CsSnCl1.5Br1.5 (−496 ppm) is intermediate with
respect to the cubic phases of CsSnCl3 (−561 ppm)
and CsSnBr3 (−353 ppm). Taken together, these findings
demonstrate that 119Sn MAS NMR is well-suited for probing
the atomic-level microstructure of mixed-cation and mixed-aniontin(II)halide perovskites, as it is highly sensitive to both the A-site and
X-site composition. The 119Sn data can be complemented
by 13C, 14N, and 133Cs NMR measurements
to evaluate the local structure and dynamics of the A site, as discussed
further in the text.
Degradation Pathways
Having established
a comprehensive
database of 119Sn shifts for various relevant tin halideperovskite materials, we now explore degradation pathways in this
class of compounds. Figure shows a comparison between pristine and degraded MASnBr3, FASnBr3, CsSnBr3, MASnI3, FASnI3, and CsSnI3. The degradation was performed ex situ in air, and the degradation conditions (temperature
and duration) were chosen phenomenologically depending on the stability
of different compounds, as monitored by the disappearance of the pristine
perovskite119Sn signal.
Figure 5
119Sn as a probe of tin(II)
halide perovskite degradation. 119Sn solid-state MAS NMR
spectra at 4.7 T, 12 kHz MAS.,and
298 K: (a) MASnBr3 (as prepared); (b) MASnBr3 (degraded for 1 h at 250 °C in air); (c) SnO2; (d)
SnO2 + 10 mol % SnBr2 (ground and annealed at
250 °C in air); (e) FASnBr3 (as prepared); (f) FASnBr3 (degraded for 5 days at RT, in air); (g) FASnBr3 (degraded for 0.5 h at 250 °C in air); (h) CsSnBr3 (as prepared); (i) CsSnBr3 (degraded for 0.5 h at 350
°C in air); (j) MASnI3 (as prepared); (k) MASnI3 (degraded for 1 h at 150 °C in air); (l) FASnI3 (as prepared); (m) FASnI3 (degraded for 1 h at RT in
air); (n) CsSnI3 (as prepared); (o) CsSnI3 (degraded
for 3 h at 100 °C in air). The dashed lines indicate points at
which spectra acquired at different transmitter offsets were stitched
together: (b, i) two offsets; (k) three offsets. For (m) and (o) only
the high-field (low ppm) part was acquired.
119Sn as a probe of tin(II)halideperovskite degradation. 119Sn solid-state MAS NMR
spectra at 4.7 T, 12 kHz MAS.,and
298 K: (a) MASnBr3 (as prepared); (b) MASnBr3 (degraded for 1 h at 250 °C in air); (c) SnO2; (d)
SnO2 + 10 mol % SnBr2 (ground and annealed at
250 °C in air); (e) FASnBr3 (as prepared); (f) FASnBr3 (degraded for 5 days at RT, in air); (g) FASnBr3 (degraded for 0.5 h at 250 °C in air); (h) CsSnBr3 (as prepared); (i) CsSnBr3 (degraded for 0.5 h at 350
°C in air); (j) MASnI3 (as prepared); (k) MASnI3 (degraded for 1 h at 150 °C in air); (l) FASnI3 (as prepared); (m) FASnI3 (degraded for 1 h at RT in
air); (n) CsSnI3 (as prepared); (o) CsSnI3 (degraded
for 3 h at 100 °C in air). The dashed lines indicate points at
which spectra acquired at different transmitter offsets were stitched
together: (b, i) two offsets; (k) three offsets. For (m) and (o) only
the high-field (low ppm) part was acquired.Thermal degradation (1 h at 250 °C in air) of MASnBr3 (Figure a) leads
to a mixture of MA2SnBr6, SnO2, SnBr4, and trace amounts of species at −932 ppm, which we
tentatively assign to an ionic product of the reaction between tin(II)
and decomposition products of the organic cation. Interestingly, the
SnO2 signal in the degraded perovskite is significantly
broader (fwhm 3.5 kHz) in comparison to neat microcrystallineSnO2 (fwhm 0.2 kHz), which suggests that the SnO2 formed
during decomposition is locally highly disordered. This could be caused
by bromide doping[100] or amorphization.
We exclude bromide doping as the reason for the observed disorder,
since a SnO2 mechanochemically doped with SnBr2 and annealed at the same temperature as the degradation process
did not lead to broadening of the SnO2 resonance (Figure d). We therefore
conclude that the SnO2 formed during the degradation of
tin(II) halides perovskites is poorly crystalline or forms as nanodomains.
We note that this would likely render its detection challenging by
XRD.We also observed that degradation under ambient conditions
leads
to products qualitatively similar to those of high-temperature degradation.
However, the products formed at room temperature are considerably
more locally disordered. Room-temperature degradation (5 days at RT,
in air) of FASnBr3 (Figure e) leads to very broad peaks of SnO2 (fwhm
∼10 kHz) as well as FA2SnBr6 (two components,
3–6 kHz) (Figure f). After 5 days of exposure to ambient laboratory air, the sample
of microcrystalline FASnBr3 still contains a large amount
of the nondegraded perovskite (∼45% of the initial content).
Degradation at 250 °C leads to complete disappearance of the
perovskite phase and renders the peaks narrower (SnO2,
two components, fwhm 2–3 kHz; FA2SnBr6, fwhm 4 kHz), presumably as a result of thermal annealing (Figure g). Similarly, in
the case of CsSnBr3 degraded for 0.5 h at 350 °C in
air, we observe the formation of SnO2 and Cs2SnBr6 (Figure h,i).Analogous effects are observed during thermal
degradation of MASnI3 (Figure j,k)
as well as FASnI3 (Figure l,m) and CsSnI3 (Figure n,o), which yield FA2SnI6 (−4818 ppm) and Cs2SnI6 (−4518
ppm), respectively. We have also acquired powder XRD diffraction on
the degraded materials, which show the presence of the oxidized A2SnX6 species (Figure S12). In addition, we note that we have detected metallic β-Sn
in the sample of degraded MASnI3 (Figure k, inset), which, however, is only present
as a trace impurity (see Table S4 for the
necessary acquisition times). The anisotropic Knight shift of the
β-Sn impurity is consistent with that of a reference β-Sn
powder sample (δiso 6864 ppm or 0.68%, δaniso 486 ppm, η = 0.1) and with the values previously
reported for metallic tin powder[101,102] and thin
films.[79] Interestingly, β-Sn has
been recently used as an additive to increase the stability of FASnI3.[16] We suggest that the presence
of metallic tin in tin(II) halide perovskites among the degradation
products may contribute to the high conductivity values previously
reported in the literature for tin(II) halide perovskites, an effect
to date attributed uniquely to self-doping. The formation of SnO2 and SnX4 has been shown in a recent TGA study,[103] which corresponds to the state in which the
organic component has been fully volatilized. Solid-state 119Sn NMR carried out on materials degraded under similar conditions
refines this picture by showing that the degradation proceeds through
an intermediate which is the corresponding tin(IV) halostannate, A2SnX6. The conclusions of our study are therefore
fully consistent with those of Leijtens et al.[103] On the basis of these observations, we conclude that 119Sn MAS is well-suited for studying degradation mechanisms
in tin(II) halide perovskites.
Optimal Experimental Conditions
for 119Sn NMR Detection
One of the most important
considerations associated with the acquisition
of 119Sn MAS NMR data of tin(II) halide perovskites, their
precursors, and degradation products is that the 119Sn
longitudinal relaxation times (T1) can
span 6 orders of magnitude (Figure ). This makes it essential to carefully adjust the
experimental parameters so as to ensure optimal sensitivity and/or
quantitativeness. The physical reason behind such a large spread of T1 values is the difference in the dominating
relaxation mechanism in different groups of tin compounds. T1 relaxation in tin halides has been shown to
be largely due to the 119Sn–X scalar coupling, whereby
the relaxation rate depends on the coupling strength.[78,93] Since 1JSn–I > 1JSn–Br > 1JSn–Cl, it is expected that scalar
relaxation
is fastest in iodostannates, intermediate in bromostannates, and slowest
in chlorostannates.[78,93] This trend is clearly visible
experimentally (Figure , blue). Beyond the coupling strength, the efficiency of scalar relaxation
also depends on the rate at which the coupling is modulated (e.g.,
by fast relaxation of the halogen or chemical exchange). If these
processes are not fast enough relative to the coupling strength, other
mechanisms such as CSA or dipolar driven relaxation may prove more
efficient. This is likely the case for SnBr2, SnI2, SnI4, and MA2SnBr6, since these
compounds have considerably longer T1 values
in comparison to the corresponding iodo- and bromostannates. Since
the 1JSn–Cl values are
relatively small (<0.5 kHz),[93] it is
possible that solid tin chlorides and chlorostannates are relaxed
by these alternative processes.[78,93] Relaxation in tin metal
(β-Sn) is driven by the conduction electrons, as shown by Korringa.[104] In the next section, we elucidate the relaxation mechanism for 119Sn in MASnBr3 and show that it is indeed determined by the scalar coupling
to the halogen and driven by the motion of halides.
Figure 6
119Sn longitudinal
relaxation times (T1) at 4.7 T, 298 K,
and 12 kHz MAS (except for SnBr4, which was measured at
0.6 kHz MAS to prevent melting) of
the tin(II)- and tin(IV)-containing phases investigated in this work:
(blue) tin(II) halide perovskites; (green) tin(II) halides; (yellow)
tin(IV) halides and halostannates(IV). The numerical values are reported
in Table S3.
119Sn longitudinal
relaxation times (T1) at 4.7 T, 298 K,
and 12 kHz MAS (except for SnBr4, which was measured at
0.6 kHz MAS to prevent melting) of
the tin(II)- and tin(IV)-containing phases investigated in this work:
(blue) tin(II) halide perovskites; (green) tin(II) halides; (yellow)
tin(IV) halides and halostannates(IV). The numerical values are reported
in Table S3.
Complementarity with 13C, 14N, and 133Cs NMR
We note that the fast scalar relaxation
does not affect the nuclei which are not directly bonded to the halogen.
The scalar relaxation therefore has no effect on the A-site cation,
which can be probed using high-resolution 1H, 13C, 133Cs, and 14N MAS NMR, as our group and
others have previously shown for lead halide perovskites.[39−42,45,53,55,56]Figure S2 shows low-temperature 1H–13C CP spectra of methylammonium tin(II) single- and mixed-halideperovskites. The 13C resonance of MA in the mixed-halide
compositions is broader in comparison to single halide compositions
due to halide disorder. The 13C resonances fall within
a similar chemical shift range, which makes the use of 119Sn considerably more advantageous for the elucidation of tin halide
coordination environments. Figure S3 shows room-temperature 14N MAS spectra of MASnI3, FASnI3, and MA0.25FA0.75SnI3. We have previously shown
that the width of the 14N SSB manifold is related to the
cubooctahedral symmetry in lead halide perovskites, with narrower
manifolds corresponding to cubooctahedral symmetry closer to cubic;
here we show that the same considerations hold for tin(II) halideperovskites. For example, the MA and FA SSB manifolds broaden in MA0.25FA0.75SnI3 in comparison to the single-cation
compositions, indicating that the overall cubooctahedral symmetry
has been reduced due to A-site cation mixing, similar to the effect
previously observed in mixed-cation lead halide perovskites.[39] Finally, Figure S4 shows room-temperature 133Cs spectra of CsSnX3 (X = I, Br, Cl). The signals are narrow (fwhm 90–110 Hz)
and well-resolved, which potentially makes 133Cs MAS NMR
well suited for studying component mixing and phase segregation processes
in Cs-containing tinhalide perovskites, similarly to how what has
previously been shown in the context of lead halide perovskites.[40]
Halide Dynamics in MASnBr3
NMR relaxation
in solids is caused by fluctuating magnetic fields arising due to
modulation of various interactions. It can therefore be used to study
dynamic processes with time scales ranging from picoseconds to seconds.[105] We demonstrate this by using 119Sn T1 relaxation to probe the dynamic
processes in MASnBr3. The following mechanisms can in principle
cause 119Sn relaxation in solids: (a) dipole–dipole
interaction,[106] (b) chemical shift anisotropy
(CSA),[106] (c) Raman process,[107,108] (d) MAS-induced heteronuclear polarization exchange,[109] and (e) scalar relaxation.[106]In order to elucidate which mechanism is relevant
in MASnBr3, we acquired variable-temperature T1 relaxation data at three magnetic field strengths, 4.7,
9.4, and 17.6 T, and found that T1 relaxation
is essentially field independent (Figure b). The CSA mechanism has a strong field
dependence and hence can be excluded. Dipole–dipole relaxation
leads to a T1 minimum in the range of
seconds (∼5 s); hence, this mechanism can also be excluded
(see Supplementary Note 2 for the calculation).
The Raman process leads to T1 values which
are independent of the magnetic field strength and inversely proportional
to the square of the temperature, the latter of which is the case
here (Figure S5). MAS-induced heteronuclear
polarization exchange arises due to crossing between energy levels
of a spin 1/2 nucleus such as 119Sn, 207Pb,
or 199Hg coupled to a quadrupolar spin with a very large
quadrupolar coupling constant, which is the case for 127I and 79/81Br. In this mechanism, the T1 value is significantly reduced when the sample is spun.
We did not observe T1 shortening between
the static and spinning case (Figure S6). Finally, scalar relaxation is expected to be field independent
and may be caused by modulation of the 119Sn–79/81Br scalar coupling due to either chemical exchange (scalar
relaxation of the first kind) or fast quadrupolar relaxation of 79/81Br (scalar relaxation of the second kind).[106] The physical origin of the process can be determined
from the temperature dependence of the T2 relaxation times, which decrease with increasing temperature if
they are caused by relaxation of the quadrupolar nucleus and increase
with temperature if they are caused by chemical exchange, provided
the system is in the extreme narrowing limit.[93] However, if the system is in the slow-motion limit, both processes
lead to longer 119Sn T2 values
as the temperature increases (see also Supplementary Note 3). We use the fwhm of the 119Sn signal as
a measure of T2 since we found that it
is field independent; hence, it does not originate from a distribution
of chemical environments (i.e., T2* ≈ T2). Experimentally, we observe that the 119Sn resonances become narrower as the temperature increases
(Figure a and Table S1), which shows that T2 increases with temperature. Since determining the relaxation
regime for the quadrupolar partner is not straightforward in this
case due to its very large quadrupole coupling constant,[110] we employ the determined activation energy
as a constraint to identify the relevant relaxation mechanism. Plotting
ln(119Sn T1/s) as a function
of the inverse temperature yields an Arrhenius plot (Figure b) from which we determine
the activation energy of the process driving the relaxation (Table and Table S2). Averaging the results obtained at three magnetic
fields and between 250 and 450 K, we obtain an average activation
energy of 36 ± 6 kJ/mol or 0.37 ± 0.06 eV. This value is
in fairly good agreement with those previously found for bromide diffusion
in MASnBr3 using ac and dc conductivity measurements (0.30
and 0.31 eV, respectively).[111,112] This value is also
comparable to those previously reported for halide diffusion in α-SnI2 (0.29 eV) and MAPbI3 (0.29 ± 0.06 eV). This
result suggests that T1 relaxation of 119Sn in MASnBr3 is primarily driven by scalar relaxation
of the first kind: i.e., by movement of species inside the crystal
lattice. Scalar relaxation of the second kind, on the other hand,
would lead to activation energies corresponding to the process driving
quadrupolar relaxation of 79/81Br, i.e. vibrational modes
of the lattice, which are active in the far-infrared to terahertz
regime (<0.03 eV).[113,114] Since tin halides are ionic
conductors,[115] we conclude that the chemical
exchange process which drives 119Sn relaxation in MASnBr3 is the diffusion of Br– ions in the crystal
lattice. Ionic conductivity due to halides has been previously shown
in lead halide perovskites[57,116] and tin halides.[115,117] These results confirm that MASnBr3 is indeed an ionic
conductor. DFT calculations predict a formation energy of 0.37 eV
for iodide vacancies in MASnI3 which is comparable to the
experimentally measured ionic diffusion activation barrier. We note
that, although these two processes are not equivalent, halide migration
relies on the presence of halide vacancies.[118] Since MASnBr3 starts decomposing above ∼420 K
and there is no T1 minimum in the accessible
temperature range, it was not possible to fit the full form of the
relaxation process to access the halide diffusion rate. We note, however,
that the previously calculated halide hopping rates are in the nanosecond
range in lead halide perovskites.[119,120]
Figure 7
Halide dynamics in MASnBr3 from multi-field variable-temperature 119Sn solid-state
MAS NMR. (a) variable–temperature
(308–474 K) 119Sn spectra at 17.6 T. All spectra
were acquired using the same number of scans (4096) and are quantitative.
The spectrum after thermal decomposition corresponds to MA2SnBr6 (Figure b) with traces of SnO2 as discussed above. (b)
Arrhenius plot of the 119Sn T1 relaxation data at 4.7 T (blue), 9.4 T (red), and 17.6 T (green).
The linear fits are indicated by dotted lines, and the numerical values
are given in Table S2.
Table 1
Activation Energies (Ea) for Halide Migration
in Tin(II) Halide Perovskites
and Related Phasesa
material
Ea (kJ/mol)
Ea (eV)
technique
ref
MASnBr3 (4.7 T)
42.7 ± 0.5
0.44
solid–state NMR
this work
MASnBr3 (9.4 T)
31.9 ± 0.1
0.33
MASnBr3 (17.6 T)
34.1 ± 0.1
0.35
MASnBr3 (average)b
36 ± 6
0.37 ± 0.06
MASnBr3
29.1
0.30
ac conductivity
(111)
MASnBr3
30
0.31
dc conductivity
(112)
α-SnI2
28
0.29
ac conductivity
(115)
MASnI3
63
0.37 (VI)c
DFT
(118)
0.65 (Ii)c
MAPbI3
28 ± 6
0.29 ± 0.06
transient ion-drift
(116)
MAPbI3
16
0.17
127I NQR
(57)
The uncertainty is given as one
standard deviation.
The
uncertainty is calculated as
the standard error of the average.
Defect formation energy at the valence
band maximum: VI, iodide vacancy; Ii, iodide
interstitial.
The uncertainty is given as one
standard deviation.The
uncertainty is calculated as
the standard error of the average.Defect formation energy at the valence
band maximum: VI, iodide vacancy; Ii, iodide
interstitial.Halide dynamics in MASnBr3 from multi-field variable-temperature 119Sn solid-state
MAS NMR. (a) variable–temperature
(308–474 K) 119Sn spectra at 17.6 T. All spectra
were acquired using the same number of scans (4096) and are quantitative.
The spectrum after thermal decomposition corresponds to MA2SnBr6 (Figure b) with traces of SnO2 as discussed above. (b)
Arrhenius plot of the 119Sn T1 relaxation data at 4.7 T (blue), 9.4 T (red), and 17.6 T (green).
The linear fits are indicated by dotted lines, and the numerical values
are given in Table S2.Finally, we show that the comparatively low activation energy for
halide diffusion leads to spontaneous halide mixing at room temperature,
which can be conveniently probed using 119Sn MAS NMR.
Spontaneous Halide Mixing
Thermally activated halide
mixing has been previously demonstrated in microcrystalline[46] lead halide perovskites and in polycrystalline
thin films.[90,121] In order to demonstrate this
phenomenon in the context of tin(II) halide perovskites, we physically
mixed equimolar amounts of microcrystalline MASnBr3 (Figure a, −316 ppm)
and MASnCl3 (Figure b, −398 ppm) by weighing the materials into a vial
and turning the vial upside down five times to provide light mixing.
The spectrum recorded after 24 h of storing the mixture under argon
at room temperature shows that the single-halide perovskites have
fully disappeared and a new chemical species has formed (Figure c,d). Recording a
spectrum with a short recycle delay highlights the quickly relaxing
bromide-rich coordination environments (−325 ppm, Figure c), while using a
long recycle delay accentuates the slowly relaxing chloride-rich environments
(−340 ppm, Figure d). The resulting mixed-halideperovskite has a composition
similar to that of MASnCl1.5Br1.5 (−353
ppm, Figure e), although
the slight difference in chemical shifts demonstrates that the two
materials are not identical. We expect these results to carry over
to other tin(II) halide perovskite compositions and suggest that spontaneous
halide mixing should occur whenever there is an intergranular halide
concentration gradient.
Figure 8
119Sn as a probe of spontaneous halide
mixing. 119Sn solid-state MAS NMR spectra at 4.7 T and
12 kHz MAS:
(a) MASnBr3; (b) MASnCl3 (the asterisk indicates
a spinning sideband); (c) 1/1 (mol/mol) mixture of MASnBr3 and MASnCl3, lightly mixed, recorded after 24 h with
a recycle delay of 50 ms; (d) same as (c) but using a recycle delay
of 15 s to highlight the slowly relaxing chloride-rich environments;
(e) MASnCl1.5Br1.5.
119Sn as a probe of spontaneous halide
mixing. 119Sn solid-state MAS NMR spectra at 4.7 T and
12 kHz MAS:
(a) MASnBr3; (b) MASnCl3 (the asterisk indicates
a spinning sideband); (c) 1/1 (mol/mol) mixture of MASnBr3 and MASnCl3, lightly mixed, recorded after 24 h with
a recycle delay of 50 ms; (d) same as (c) but using a recycle delay
of 15 s to highlight the slowly relaxing chloride-rich environments;
(e) MASnCl1.5Br1.5.
Conclusions
We have identified and overcome the challenges
associated with
the acquisition of solid-state 119Sn MAS NMR data, namely
that the longitudinal relaxation of 119Sn in tin(II) halideperovskites and related materials spans 6 orders of magnitude, which
makes it essential to judiciously choose the experimental parameters
so as to obtain optimal results. We have shown that solid-state 119Sn MAS NMR can be used to characterize the local structure
of tin(II) mixed-halide and mixed A-site cation perovskites and related
phases as well as to distinguish between tin(II) and tin(IV) halostannate
phases. This property in particular can be employed to study degradation
processes in tin(II) halide perovskites, and we have exemplified it
by identifying the degradation products of MASnBr3, FASnBr3, CsSnBr3, MASnI3, FASnI3, and CsSnI3. We have found that, regardless of the composition,
the decomposition products include amorphous SnO2 and the
corresponding tin(IV) halostannate, A2SnX6.
Further, we have identified the dominant NMR relaxation mechanism
of 119Sn in solid MASnBr3 as scalar relaxation
of the first kind driven by bromide diffusion inside the perovskite
lattice. We have quantified the activation energy of this process
using variable-temperature multi-field relaxation measurements and
found that the values are in excellent agreement with those extracted
from previously reported electrical conductivity measurements. Finally,
we have shown that spontaneous halide homogenization occurs at room
temperature between microcrystalline single-halidetin(II) halideperovskites, which leads to mixed-halide materials. We expect this
property of tin(II) halide perovskite to carry over to other tin(II)halideperovskite systems featuring a halide concentration gradient.
Taken together, we believe that 119Sn MAS NMR is a general
and versatile technique providing information on local structure and
dynamics in tin(II) halide perovskites, complementary to the data
obtained by diffraction techniques and optical spectroscopy.
Authors: Woon Seok Yang; Byung-Wook Park; Eui Hyuk Jung; Nam Joong Jeon; Young Chan Kim; Dong Uk Lee; Seong Sik Shin; Jangwon Seo; Eun Kyu Kim; Jun Hong Noh; Sang Il Seok Journal: Science Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Douglas H Fabini; Geneva Laurita; Jonathon S Bechtel; Constantinos C Stoumpos; Hayden A Evans; Athanassios G Kontos; Yannis S Raptis; Polycarpos Falaras; Anton Van der Ven; Mercouri G Kanatzidis; Ram Seshadri Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Seon Joo Lee; Seong Sik Shin; Young Chan Kim; Dasom Kim; Tae Kyu Ahn; Jun Hong Noh; Jangwon Seo; Sang Il Seok Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-03-17 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Guy M Bernard; Roderick E Wasylishen; Christopher I Ratcliffe; Victor Terskikh; Qichao Wu; Jillian M Buriak; Tate Hauger Journal: J Phys Chem A Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 2.781
Authors: Zonghan Hong; Davin Tan; Rohit Abraham John; Yong Kang Eugene Tay; Yan King Terence Ho; Xin Zhao; Tze Chien Sum; Nripan Mathews; Felipe García; Han Sen Soo Journal: iScience Date: 2019-06-03
Authors: Dominik J Kubicki; Daniel Prochowicz; Albert Hofstetter; Shaik M Zakeeruddin; Michael Grätzel; Lyndon Emsley Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2017-09-27 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Thomas Webb; Nourdine Zibouche; Luis Lanzetta; Xinxing Liang; Dong Ding; Ganghong Min; Robert J E Westbrook; Benedetta Gaggio; Thomas J Macdonald; M Saiful Islam; Saif A Haque Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Abhoy Karmakar; Amit Bhattacharya; Diganta Sarkar; Guy M Bernard; Arthur Mar; Vladimir K Michaelis Journal: Chem Sci Date: 2020-12-30 Impact factor: 9.825