Literature DB >> 28891320

Improving Drainage After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Based on Health-Related Quality of Life: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Huiming Jiang1, Diandong Huang1, Shiwu Yao1, Siping Liu1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The impact of drainage type after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has been rarely studied. We conducted a prospective randomized study to evaluate the differences in HRQoL among patients who received different drainage types.
METHODS: A total of 90 patients who underwent PCNL were randomized into three groups to receive a nephrostomy tube (Group 1), a Double-J (JJ) stent (Group 2), and an open-ended ureteral catheter (Group 3) after PCNL, respectively. We compared the perioperative characteristics, surgical outcomes, and HRQoL using Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life (WiSQoL) questionnaire among three groups.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patients' characteristics such as age, gender ratio, body mass index, stone burden, and so on. Majority of the surgical outcomes (operative time, estimated blood loss, hemoglobin drop, postoperative complications, and stone-free rate) were also comparable, except for the duration of hospitalization, visual analog scale, and analgesic required. The preoperative WiSQoL scores were similar among the three groups, but significant differences occurred postoperation (Groups 1, 2, and 3, 122.0 vs 105.6 vs 124.4, p < 0.001). Besides, patients in Group 2 had lower willingness (Groups 1, 2, and 3, 86.7% vs 70.0% vs 96.7%, p = 0.02) to undergo the same procedure as future treatment, if needed.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that the drainage types after PCNL using a nephrostomy tube or a JJ stent or an open-ended ureteral catheter were equally safe and efficacious, but patients who received a nephrostomy tube or an open-ended ureteral catheter had better HRQoL.

Entities:  

Keywords:  health-related quality of life; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; tubeless nephrostomy

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28891320     DOI: 10.1089/end.2017.0444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  5 in total

Review 1.  Research progress of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Chao Wei; Yucong Zhang; Gaurab Pokhrel; Xiaming Liu; Jiahua Gan; Xiao Yu; Zhangqun Ye; Shaogang Wang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Validated Methods of Assessing Quality of Life in Stone Disease.

Authors:  Ruchika Talwar; Justin Ziemba
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Translation and Linguistic Validation of the Korean Version of the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life Questionnaire.

Authors:  Young Eun Yoon; Sung Yong Cho
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 4.  Complications and outcomes of tubeless versus nephrostomy tube in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Vineet Gauhar; Olivier Traxer; Esther García Rojo; Simone Scarcella; Maria Pia Pavia; Vinson Wai-Shun Chan; Eugenio Pretore; Marcelo Langer Wroclawski; Mariela Corrales; Ho Yee Tiong; Ee Jean Lim; Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh; Chin-Tiong Heng; Jean de la Rosette; Bhaskar Kuman Somani; Daniele Castellani
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.861

5.  The impact of post PCNL tube type on blood loss and postoperative pain.

Authors:  Salman Jamil; M Hammad Ather
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.