Literature DB >> 32292442

The impact of post PCNL tube type on blood loss and postoperative pain.

Salman Jamil1, M Hammad Ather2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of nephrostomy tube type on postoperative pain and blood loss following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).
METHODS: This is a prospective non-randomized study performed at Aga Khan University Hospital from July 2017 to June 2018. In this study we prospectively studied adult patients (16 to 65 years) who underwent unilateral PCNL. Patients who had nephrostomy with balloon (12Fr Foley's catheter) were compared with patients who had nephrostomy without balloon (12Fr Nelaton™ catheter). STONE Nephrolithometry score was used to assess the stone complexity. Mean pain score at six and 24 hours and mean hemoglobin drop at 24 hours was compared between two groups using independent sample t-test, p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: Over one year, 198 PCNL were performed out of which 119 were included for analysis. Sixty-six had nephrostomy tube with balloon and 53 had nephrostomy tube without balloon. Mean STONE score (9.66±1.4 vs. 9.64±1.24) and operative time (72.84±28.34 vs. 86.05±32.1 minutes) was comparable. Mean postoperative pain score at 6 hours and 24 hours postoperative was significantly lower in balloon group as compared to without balloon group. Mean Hemoglobin drop was similar in both groups (p=0.60).
CONCLUSION: The use of nephrostomy tube with balloon after PCNL as this is associated with less pain and comparable hemoglobin drop as compare to nephrostomy tube without balloon. Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pain; Perc; Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL); Percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN)

Year:  2020        PMID: 32292442      PMCID: PMC7150389          DOI: 10.12669/pjms.36.3.1558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pak J Med Sci        ISSN: 1681-715X            Impact factor:   1.088


INTRODUCTION

PCNL is the standard of care for patients with moderate to large upper tract urinary stones. Despite being minimally invasive it can cause significant pain and sometimes lead to life-threatening complications such as bleeding, sepsis and peri-renal visceral injury.1 Multiple factors influence postoperative pain and haemoglobin drop. Most of them e.g. body mass index, stone size and stone location are patient and stone related and cannot be modified.2 However there are factors which can be modified to reduce postoperative pain and hemoglobin drop e.g. ultrasound-guided access, use of Amplatz™ or balloon dilatation systems, reducing the operative time, staging the procedure in cases of a large stone burden and placement of a nephrostomy tube.3 Nephrostomy tube type is a modifiable factor, which can potentially influence postoperative pain and haemoglobin drop. Su H et al. in 20154 compared the effect of nephrostomy tubes with and without balloon after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. They observed significantly less hemoglobin drop in nephrostomy tube with balloon as compared to those without balloon at 72 hours postoperatively, however noted no difference in postoperative pain. Jiang and colleagues5 however noted that the drainage types after PCNL using a nephrostomy tube, a double J stent or an open-ended ureteral catheter were equally safe and efficacious. They also observed that compared to a nephrostomy tube or an open-ended ureteral catheter double J stent adversely affect HRQoL. In a systematic review of recent publications Lee et al.6 noted that for hemoglobin changes, total tubeless and finer caliber percutaneous procedure are better than other methods. However, in order to improve hospital stay, total tubeless and tubeless PCNLs with stent may be superior to other procedures. In the current work we have attempted to assess the impact of type of nephrostomy placed post PCNL have influence on postoperative pain and hemoglobin drop.

METHODS

This is a prospective non-randomized study performed at Aga Khan University Hospital from July 2017 to June 2018. Adult patients 16 to 65 years of age undergoing unilateral PCNL with single tract using 26Fr Amplatz™ sheath for stones in kidney confirmed on non-contrast CT abdomen were included. Patients who previously had open renal surgery on the same side or had a percutaneous nephrostomy already in place or raised serum creatinine (>1.2mg/dL), raised INR (>1.3) or reduced platelet (<100/mm3) were excluded. After institutional review committee approval (Ref: 4649-SUR-ERC-17 dated May 3, 2017), all patients who fulfill the inclusion criteria were included in the study following an informed consent. Consultant surgeon with more than five years of experience performed PCNL. Procedure was done in prone position after placing ureteric catheter in the same general anesthesia using a flexible cystoscope in supine position. Tract was dilated using serial metallic dilators. Stone fragmented with ultrasonic probe using EMS™ lithoclast master. At the end of procedure a 12 Ch., nephrostomy tube, both with or without balloon, was placed and clamped overnight. Patients who had 12 Ch. Foley’s catheter, with balloon inflated (approx. 1-1.5 cc) placed as nephrostomy were included in Group-A. Patients with 12Ch. Nelaton catheter™ placed as nephrostomy were included in Group-B. Choice of nephrostomy was left on operating surgeon’s discretion. Nephrostomy was de-clamped on first post-operative day and subsequently removed on 2-5th postoperative day at the discretion of the admitting surgeon. Post-operative hemoglobin and hematocrit were measured at 24 hours. All patients received paracetamol 1g 6hrly and Tramadol 50mg 8hrly for postoperative pain. Pain was assessed at 6 hours and 24 hours post-operatively. Data was analyzed through SPSS™ version 21. Mean and standard deviation was calculated for quantitative variables i.e. age, BMI, stone size, density (HU unit) and pain score on VAS. Frequency and percentages were calculated for qualitative variables, i.e. gender, hydronephrosis. Mean postoperative hemoglobin drop was calculated after subtracting 24hr post op hemoglobin from preoperative hemoglobin. of each patient. Mean pain score was calculated at 6 and 24 hrs. Mean postoperative pain and hemoglobin drop of 2 groups were compared using independent sample student t-test. Effect modifiers were controlled through stratification of age, sex, and stone size and STONE score.7

RESULTS

A total of 198 cases had this procedure during the study period out of which 119 were included for final analysis, 66 were in Group-A and 53 in Group-B . Baseline parameters are detailed in Table-I. Both groups were comparable in terms of age, BMI and stone complexity. Complete clearance was achieved in 102 patients and JJ stent was placed in 65 patients. Only four patients required transfusion, none of the patient required angioembolization.
Table-I

Baseline parameters.

Group-A (Foley’s catheter)Group-B (Nelaton catheter)p-value
TOTAL (n)6653
Age (years)44.47+/-13.644.94+/-14.50.181
Female1816
Male4837
BMI26.2+/-4.226.8+/-3.90.418
Stone size22.27+/-8.0320.68+/-6.790.246
Mean HU1065.9+/-298.331019+/-329.940.428
Tract length85.96+/-23.892.0+/-25.250.183
Operative time72.84+/-28.3486.05+/-32.10.021
Hydronephrosis
GRADE 0911
GRADE 1123
GRADE 22230
GRADE 3185
GRADE 454
No. of calyces involved
1125
22637
3167
4124
STONE Score9.66+/-1.449.64+/-1.240.935
Mean pre op Hemoglobin.13.48+/-2.2713.64+/-1.900.673
Mean 24 hrs. Hemoglobin.12.40+/-2.1812.30+/-2.350.816
Mean pre op Hct.41.01+/-5.8841.59+/-5.220.565
Mean 24 hrs. Hct.37.03+/-7.0038.23+/-5.630.303
Baseline parameters. There was no significant difference in postoperative Hemoglobin drop between two groups, however mean postoperative pain score at six hours and 24 hours was signifcanlty lower in Group-A (Tables-II and III). Multivariate regression analysis showed that expected mean pain scores at 6 hours is 0.474 units more among those without balloon as compared to those with balloon after adjusting for other covariates. BMI, JJ stenting and Nephrostomy tube were found to be significant independent predictors of pain at 24hours. The expected mean pain scores after 24 hours is 0.389 units more among those without balloon as compared to those with balloon after adjusting for other covariates (Table-IV).
Table-II

Comparison of outcome parameters.

Group-AGroup-Bp-value
Mean PAIN SCORE 6HRS4.76+/-0.815.24+/-0.970.004
MEAN PAIN SCORE 24HRS2.26+/-0.912.69+/-1.060.020
Mean Hemoglobin drop1.08+/-0.71.14+/-0.690.60
Meant Hct drop3.43+/-2.213.41+/-1.970.97
Table-III

Comparison of outcome parameters.

Group-AGroup-BTotalp-value
Complete ClearanceYes55471020.41
No11617
JJ StentingYes3629650.98
No302454
No. of TransfusionsYes3140.26
No6352114
Table-IV

Multivariate analysis of outcome parameters.

Paint at 6 hours

Odds RatioSth. Errorp-value95.0% Confidence Interval
(Constant)3.9570.3400.0003.283-4.631
Nephrostomy Tube0.4740.1650.0050.148-0.801
Gender0.2610.1810.151-0.097-0.619

Pain at 24 hours

(Constant)-0.2130.6250.734-1.451-1.025
Nephrostomy Tube0.3890.1730.0260.047-0.731
BMI0.0710.0210.0010.029-0.113
JJ Stenting0.4950.1750.0050.149-0.840
Comparison of outcome parameters. Comparison of outcome parameters. Multivariate analysis of outcome parameters.

DISCUSSION

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) despite being minimally invasive can cause significant pain and blood loss.8 Post operative pain is the most common concern in immediate post-operative period. There are many ways of reducing postoperative pain. These include local anesthetic infiltration into the tract9 reducing the renal pelvic pressure during surgery, paravertebral block (T11-L1), using postoperative opioid analgesia, reducing the size of nephrostomy tube or not placing a nephrostomy tube at all.10-13 Multiple studies have shown that tubeless PCNL is safe and feasible for select group of patients. However, keeping nephrostomy at end of procedure is desirable in some conditions e.g. residual stone, longer operative time, more than 1 percutaneous access, significant perforation of the collecting system and significant bleeding.14 It is well established that decreasing the size of nephrostomy tube can decrease post-operative pain.15 However, the effect of nephrostomy tube type on pain is less well studied. We measured pain at six and 24 hours post-operatively and found significantly less pain in balloon nephrostomy group, which may be attributable to softer latex material of balloon tube. In the current work we noted a softer balloon catheter (Foleys 12 Fr.) is much better tolerated compared to a firmer tube (Nelaton™ catherther12 Fr.) Fig.1 a and b.
Fig.1

Nephrostomy tube types. 1a: With balloon, 1b: without balloon.

Nephrostomy tube types. 1a: With balloon, 1b: without balloon. Postoperative bleeding is another major concern following PCNL. This bleeding is either parenchymal or arterial. Significant delayed bleeding is almost always due to pseudoaneurysms or arteriovenous fistulae. Serious arterial injury requiring angioembolization is around 1% in different studies.16 Parenchymal bleeding can be controlled by advancing working sheath during the procedure. However, the tamponade is lost at the end of procedure. This tamponade effect is provided postoperatively by a Foley catheter with a balloon inflated. Arterial bleeding is relatively rare and usually from a tiny arteriole and may occurs during puncture or dilatation of a tract. This type of bleeding can de dealt postoperatively by providing tamponade. Nephrostomy tube with balloon is potentially better for providing this tamponade as shown by Su et al.4 they compared nephrostomy tube with balloon and without balloon but found no significant difference in post-operative pain. In their study the primary endpoint was hemoglobin drop and they applied traction over nephrostomy, which can affect pain. Our results showed no differnece in hemoglobin drop between two groups perhaps as we did not keep nephrostomy tube on traction postoperatively that may affect hemoglobin drop.

Limitations of the study

This was an interventional study however randomization was not done. Nephrostomy tube with balloon was used by single surgeon whereas Nelaton catheter was used by others, this may have contributed to differences in postoperative pain and operative time. Whether to clamp nephrostomy before removal and when to remove ureteric and urethral catheter was left on discretion of operating surgeon.

CONCLUSION

The present study supports the use of nephrostomy tube with balloon (Foley’s catheter) after PCNL as this is associated with less pain and comparable hemoglobin drop as compare to nephrostomy tube without balloon (Nelaton catheter). Further randomized controlled trails are needed to compare both the tubes.

Authors’ Contribution:

SJ and MHA: Protocol/project development, Data collection or management, Data analysis, Manuscript writing/editing, are responsible for integrity of research.
  16 in total

1.  Elevated Renal Pelvic Pressures during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Risk Higher Postoperative Pain and Longer Hospital Stay.

Authors:  Muhannad Alsyouf; Samuel Abourbih; Benjamin West; Herbert Hodgson; D Duane Baldwin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  The S.T.O.N.E. Score: a new assessment tool to predict stone free rates in ureteroscopy from pre-operative radiological features.

Authors:  Wilson R Molina; F J Kim; Joshua Spendlove; Alexandre S Pompeo; Stefan Sillau; David E Sehrt
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

3.  Improving Drainage After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Based on Health-Related Quality of Life: A Prospective Randomized Study.

Authors:  Huiming Jiang; Diandong Huang; Shiwu Yao; Siping Liu
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Risk factors for hemorrhage requiring embolization after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Sitki Un; Volkan Cakir; Cengiz Kara; Hakan Turk; Osman Kose; Omur Balli; Yuksel Yilmaz
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Factors affecting bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Tolga Akman; Murat Binbay; Erhan Sari; Emrah Yuruk; Abdulkadir Tepeler; Muzaffer Akcay; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu; Ahmet Tefekli
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery: review of first 112 patients.

Authors:  Jerry Limb; Gary C Bellman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  The effect of nephrostomy tract infiltration of ketamine on postoperative pain and peak expiratory flow rate in patients undergoing tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Seyed Reza Hosseini; Farsad Imani; Golnar Shayanpour; Mohammad Reza Khajavi
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-03-12       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: impact of nephrostomy tube size.

Authors:  Paul K Pietrow; Brian K Auge; Costas D Lallas; Robert W Santa-Cruz; Glenn E Newman; David M Albala; Glenn M Preminger
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Predictive factors for bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Jeong Kuk Lee; Bum Soo Kim; Yoon Kyu Park
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-07-15

10.  Comparative study of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block versus intravenous tramadol for postoperative pain control in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Zehra Hatipoglu; Ersel Gulec; Mediha Turktan; Volkan Izol; Atilla Arıdogan; Yasemin Gunes; Dilek Ozcengiz
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.217

View more
  3 in total

1.  Can antibiotic preference affect bleeding in percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Retrospective comparative study of two commonly used antibiotics.

Authors:  Ali Akkoc; Cemil Aydin; Murat Ucar; Murat Topcuoglu
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.088

2.  The Correlation Between STONE Nephrolithometry Score and Hemoglobin Drop in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Mohammad Shoaib; Muhibullah Bangash; Basit Salam; M Hammad Ather
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-11-10

3.  Efficacy and safety of 3D printing-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy in complex renal calculi.

Authors:  Dong Cui; Fengqi Yan; JiangPu Yi; Dali He; Yichen Zhang; Zekai Zhang; Yuntao Chen; Yong Jiao; Bo Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.