| Literature DB >> 28890721 |
Rui Guo1,2, Jacob B Landis3, Michael J Moore4, Aiping Meng1, Shuguang Jian5, Xiaohong Yao1, Hengchang Wang1.
Abstract
Actinidia eriantha Benth. is a diploid perennial woody vine native to China and is recognized as a valuable species for commercial kiwifruit improvement with high levels of ascorbic acid as well as having been used in traditional Chinese medicine. Due to the lack of genomic resources for the species, microsatellite markers for population genetics studies are scarce. In this study, RNASeq was conducted on fruit tissue of A. eriantha, yielding 5,678,129 reads with a total output of 3.41 Gb. De novo assembly yielded 69,783 non-redundant unigenes (41.3 Mb), of which 21,730 were annotated using protein databases. A total of 8,658 EST-SSR loci were identified in 7,495 unigene sequences, for which primer pairs were successfully designed for 3,842 loci (44.4%). Among these, 183 primer pairs were assayed for PCR amplification, yielding 69 with detectable polymorphism in A. eriantha. Additionally, 61 of the 69 polymorphic loci could be successfully amplified in at least one other Actinidia species. Of these, 14 polymorphic loci (mean NA = 6.07 ± 2.30) were randomly selected for assessing levels of genetic diversity and population structure within A. eriantha. Finally, a neighbor-joining tree and Bayesian clustering analysis showed distinct clustering into two groups (K = 2), agreeing with the geographical distributions of these populations. Overall, our results will facilitate further studies of genetic diversity within A. eriantha and will aid in discriminating outlier loci involved in local adaptation.Entities:
Keywords: Actinidia eriantha; EST-SSRs; high-throughput sequencing; population genetic structure; transcriptome
Year: 2017 PMID: 28890721 PMCID: PMC5574902 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01383
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Sampling details for all species of Actinidia used in the present study.
| ShQ | Shiqian County, Guizhou Province | 27°20′ | 108°09′ | 977 | 12 | |
| YM | Mount Yangming, Hunan Province | 26°08′ | 111°57′ | 1,179 | 15 | |
| RY | Ruyuan County, Guangdong Province | 24°57′ | 113°03′ | 820 | 33 | |
| WH | Wuhua County, Guangdong Province | 23°52′ | 115°23′ | 686 | 28 | |
| RJ | Ruijin City, Jiangxi Province | 25°56′ | 116°14′ | 400 | 30 | |
| LY | Luoyuan County, Fujian Province | 26°28′ | 119°25′ | 529 | 35 | |
| LiS | Lishui City, Zhejiang Province | 28°15′ | 119°47′ | 365 | 33 | |
| WZS | Wuhan Botanical Garden, Hubei province | 30°33′ | 114°25′ | 28 | 1 | |
| WZZ | Wuhan Botanical Garden, Hubei province | 30°33′ | 114°25′ | 28 | 2 | |
| WZL | Wuhan Botanical Garden, Hubei province | 30°33′ | 114°25′ | 28 | 1 | |
| WZC | Wuhan Botanical Garden, Hubei province | 30°33′ | 114°25′ | 28 | 1 | |
| WZK | Wuhan Botanical Garden, Hubei province | 30°33′ | 114°25′ | 28 | 1 | |
| WZH | Wuhan Botanical Garden, Hubei province | 30°33′ | 114°25′ | 28 | 2 | |
| WZV | Wuhan Botanical Garden, Hubei province | 30°33′ | 114°25′ | 28 | 1 | |
| WZR | Wuhan Botanical Garden, Hubei province | 30°33′ | 114°25′ | 28 | 1 | |
| WZF | Wuhan Botanical Garden, Hubei province | 30°33′ | 114°25′ | 28 | 1 | |
| WZLi | Wuhan Botanical Garden, Hubei province | 30°33′ | 114°25′ | 28 | 1 |
Figure 1Outline of the process of unigene annotation and EST-SSR development in Actinidia eriantha.
Figure 2Distribution of unigene lengths resulting from de novo transcriptome assembly of fruits from Actinidia eriantha.
Figure 3Gene Ontology classification of unigenes. Unigenes were assigned to three categories: cellular component, molecular function, and biological process.
Figure 4KEGG pathway assignment using a reciprocal BLAST analysis with a E-value cutoff of 1e–5.
Fourteen EST-SSR loci used for assessing genetic differentiation of Actinidia eriantha
| AET-9 | 4 | 0.167 | 0.23 | 0.219 | 0.0093 |
| AET-22 | 9 | 0.5 | 0.584 | 0.56 | 0.4745 |
| AET-28 | 6 | 0.516 | 0.687 | 0.633 | 0.0127 |
| AET-38 | 5 | 0.387 | 0.745 | 0.696 | 0 |
| AET-81 | 8 | 0.468 | 0.727 | 0.681 | 0.0009 |
| AET-82 | 4 | 0.285 | 0.363 | 0.334 | 0.799 |
| AET-104 | 6 | 0.511 | 0.708 | 0.658 | 0.0113 |
| AET-121 | 8 | 0.71 | 0.735 | 0.706 | 0.401 |
| AET-122 | 4 | 0.5 | 0.702 | 0.641 | 0.6233 |
| AET-141 | 9 | 0.597 | 0.822 | 0.797 | 0.1449 |
| AET-144 | 10 | 0.672 | 0.782 | 0.745 | 0.8921 |
| AET-167 | 5 | 0.317 | 0.739 | 0.691 | 0 |
| AET-169 | 3 | 0.129 | 0.229 | 0.216 | 0.0082 |
| AET-180 | 4 | 0.387 | 0.607 | 0.534 | 0 |
Population genetic diversity and inbreeding parameters for Actinidia eriantha.
| ShQ(12) | 42/36 | 3.00/3.27 | 0.424/0.446 | 0.256/0.270 | 0.000/0.000 |
| YM(15) | 37/31 | 2.56/2.72 | 0.329/0.366 | 0.130/0.072 | 0.004/0.051 |
| RY(33) | 49/40 | 3.14/3.21 | 0.457/0.446 | 0.077/0.030 | 0.063/0.267 |
| WH(28) | 50/40 | 3.18/3.18 | 0.513/0.492 | 0.015/–0.016 | 0.098/0.139 |
| RJ(30) | 58/46 | 3.69/3.69 | 0.547/0.543 | 0.143/0.090 | 0.000/0.037 |
| LY(35) | 50/41 | 3.12/3.16 | 0.479/0.453 | –0.048/–0.095 | 0.820/0.919 |
| LiS(33) | 56/45 | 3.48/3.44 | 0.505/0.464 | 0.168/0.079 | 0.000/0.000 |
The first number in each pair represents values for all 14 SSRs, and the second number represents values for the 11 SSRs that do not have high null alleles and were not affected by positive selection.
Pairwise F values of seven populations of Actinidia eriantha.
| ShQ | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| YM | 0.404/0.344 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| RY | 0.344/0.305 | 0.291/0.287 | – | – | – | – | |
| WH | 0.331/0.297 | 0.357/0.324 | 0.272/0.305 | – | – | – | |
| RJ | 0.284/0.253 | 0.360/0.296 | 0.216/0.190 | 0.210/0.208 | – | – | |
| LY | 0.336/0.332 | 0.422/0.378 | 0.290/0.254 | 0.276/0.261 | 0.148/0.110 | – | |
| LiS | 0.309/0.312 | 0.343/0.321 | 0.214/0.210 | 0.237/0.236 | 0.112/0.087 | 0.094/0.086 |
The first number in each pair represents F.
Figure 5NJ tree and Bayesian clustering analysis results for 14 EST-SSRs of 186 individuals (7 populations) of Actinidia eriantha from South China and East China. (A) Histogram of the STRUCTURE analysis for the model with K = 2 (showing the highest delta K). Each individual is represented by a single vertical line. On the y-axes is the likelihood of assignment to each cluster. (B) Geographic origin of the seven populations and their color-coded grouping according to the STRUCTURE analysis. Population codes are identified in Table 1. (C) The neighbor joining tree of the seven populations with bootstrap values indicated in nodes with support (>50).