Literature DB >> 28890283

Factors affecting workforce participation and healthy worker biases in U.S. women and men.

Candice Y Johnson1, Carissa M Rocheleau2, Christina C Lawson2, Barbara Grajewski2, Penelope P Howards3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate potential attenuation of healthy worker biases in populations in which healthy women of reproductive age opt out of the workforce to provide childcare.
METHODS: We used 2013-2015 data from 120,928 U.S. women and men aged 22-44 years participating in the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index. We used logistic regression to estimate adjusted prevalence odds ratios (PORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between health and workforce nonparticipation.
RESULTS: Women and men reporting poor health were more likely to be out of the workforce than individuals reporting excellent health (POR: 3.7, 95% CI: 3.2-4.2; POR: 6.7, 95% CI: 5.7-7.8, respectively), suggesting potential for healthy worker bias. For women (P < .001) but not men (P = .30), the strength of this association was modified by number of children in the home: POR: 7.3 (95% CI: 5.8-9.1) for women with no children, decreasing to POR: 0.9 (95% CI: 0.6-1.5) for women with four or more children.
CONCLUSIONS: These results are consistent with attenuation of healthy worker biases when healthy women opt out of the workforce to provide childcare. Accordingly, we might expect the magnitude of these biases to vary with the proportion of women with differing numbers of children in the population. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bias (epidemiology); Healthy worker effect; Women

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28890283      PMCID: PMC5836747          DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  13 in total

Review 1.  A review of the healthy worker effect in occupational epidemiology.

Authors:  C Y Li; F C Sung
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.611

2.  A potential new data source for assessing the impacts of health reform: Evaluating the Gallup-Healthways Well-Being Index.

Authors:  Laura Skopec; Thomas Musco; Benjamin D Sommers
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2014-04-13

3.  Health and access to care among employed and unemployed adults: United States, 2009-2010.

Authors:  Anne K Driscoll; Amy B Bernstein
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2012-01

4.  Causal inference in occupational epidemiology: accounting for the healthy worker effect by using structural nested models.

Authors:  Ashley I Naimi; David B Richardson; Stephen R Cole
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09-27       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research.

Authors:  S Greenland; J Pearl; J M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 6.  Health and unemployment.

Authors:  D Dooley; J Fielding; L Levi
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 21.981

7.  Commentary: healthy worker survivor bias: a still-evolving concept.

Authors:  Sally Picciotto; Irva Hertz-Picciotto
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Worklessness and regional differences in the social gradient in general health: Evidence from the 2001 English census.

Authors:  C Bambra; F Popham
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 4.078

9.  Self-reported health and adult mortality risk: an analysis of cause-specific mortality.

Authors:  Maureen Reindl Benjamins; Robert A Hummer; Isaac W Eberstein; Charles B Nam
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  The possible absence of a healthy-worker effect: a cross-sectional survey among educated Japanese women.

Authors:  Mariko Nishikitani; Mutsuhiro Nakao; Shinobu Tsurugano; Eiji Yano
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  4 in total

1.  Poor-quality employment and health: How a welfare regime typology with a gender lens Illuminates a different work-health relationship for men and women.

Authors:  Kaori Fujishiro; Emily Q Ahonen; Megan Winkler
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Respiratory health, occupation and the healthy worker effect.

Authors:  A Senthilselvan; W V L Coonghe; J Beach
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 1.611

3.  Pregnancy disorders in female workers at the industrial area of Sidoarjo, Indonesia.

Authors:  Firman Suryadi Rahman; Tri Martiana
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2020-07-03

4.  Worker well-being in the United States: Finding variation across job categories.

Authors:  Emily Stiehl; Nkenge H Jones-Jack; Sherry Baron; Naoko Muramatsu
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-10-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.