Literature DB >> 32728568

Pregnancy disorders in female workers at the industrial area of Sidoarjo, Indonesia.

Firman Suryadi Rahman1, Tri Martiana2.   

Abstract

Background: The number of female workers in Indonesia has increased and female workers have been discovered to be very vulnerable to several hazards and health problems in the workplace environment linked to their menstrual cycle and pregnancy. Therefore, this study was conducted to analyze risk factors associated with pregnancy disorders in female workers. Design and
Methods: The research was conducted through the use of a cross-sectional design with 307 female workers using simple random sampling. Furthermore, a descriptive analysis was conducted to describe the conditions of the respondents during pregnancy to childbirth process.
Results: The results showed 45% of respondents had pregnancy disorders, 16% had miscarriages, and despite the fact most of the prenatal care processes was assisted by doctors or midwives, 2.6% of the respondents consulted Traditional Birth Attendants, who were also recorded and was found to account for 2.9% of the deliveries. Moreover, the risk factors associated with pregnancy disorders include vibrations (P=0.004), irritants (P=0.002) and repetitive works (P=0.009). Conclusions: It is recommended that companies should provide maternal and child health protection and control for any risk associated with female workers. ©Copyright: the Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Female workers; hazard; maternal and child health; pregnancy disorders

Year:  2020        PMID: 32728568      PMCID: PMC7376466          DOI: 10.4081/jphr.2020.1824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Res        ISSN: 2279-9028


Introduction

The number of female workers in both the formal and informal work sectors of Indonesia has been discovered to be increasing over the years, with most of them reported to be spending 8 hours per day at work.[1] This means they are exposed to certain processes within this period which makes the monitoring of their reproductive health very important through the use of indicators such as the Maternal Mortality Rate (MMR) and Infant Mortality Rate (IMR). However, the values for these indicators have been observed to be below the SDGs target in the country.[2] Therefore, several reproductive health strategies need to be considered in the workplace: these include the prevention and treatment of infertility, maternal and newborn health, family planning, prevention and control of Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs), and prevention and detection of cancer in the relevant organs. Moreover, some of the possible health problems associated with reproduction among female workers include menstrual cycle disorders, high anemia prevalence, spontaneous abortion, risk of abortion in chemical exposures, and reduced time of breastfeeding and taking care of babies or children.[3] In Indonesia, the law provides some special protection for female workers such as permission to take leave during their first and second days of menstruation, rest before and after giving birth as well as the restriction from working at night and for over 40 hours a week.[4] However, the laws are not fully implemented, with some of the women observed to be working more than the set limits as well as the difficulties attached to their rights to obtain maternity leave during the pregnancy.[5] Female workers possess different abilities and physiology from their male colleagues and have been reported to be very sensitive to some hazards in the workplace environment such as noise, heat, dust, and vibrations.[6] Moreover, those working for longer periods of time are likely to have higher possibility of exposure[7] while excessive workload has been found to be affecting their physical and mental health.[8] This means female workers need to be protected especially during menstrual period, pregnancy, and breastfeeding periods, due to the possibility of several disorders attached to their exposure to hazardous activities during these moments of their lives.[9] This study was conducted to analyze the situations and factors associated with pregnancy disorders in female workers before, during, and after pregnancy, such as heavy or irregular menstrual bleeding, premenstrual syndrome, dysmenorrheal disorder, and menstrual cycle disorder [10] as well as abortion or low birth weight infant.

Design and Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted on female workers in the Sidoarjo industrial area in East Java Indonesia. It involved the selection of 307 female workers as sample through simple random sampling. The primary data were obtained by using questionnaires designed to determine the conditions of female workers during pregnancy and through the childbirth process in relation to disorders and hazards in the workplace. Moreover, field observation was conducted to cross-check the validity of the information obtained while the data were analyzed using SPSS 23. It is important to note that this research was conducted after ethical approval was obtained from the Faculty of Public Health UniversitasAirlangga Research Ethics Committee.

Results and Discussion

Table 1 illustrates the socio-demographic characteristic of the respondents (N = 307). A total of 310 questionnaires were distributed in the study area by the field research team and a very high response rate of 99.03% was recorded: 307 of the respondents answered the questionnaire. The data showed that female workers were present in several industrial locations: 90.2% of them had the status of permanent employee with binding rights and obligations, 72.3% was between 36-50 years, and the highest levels of education were Junior and Senior High School (40.4% and 43.6% of the respondents respectively). Furthermore, 53.7% were recorded to have worked in the company for 11-20 years while 87.3% work on a shift system of 1-3-2 every week.
Table 1.

Socio-demographic characteristic of the respondents (N = 307).

VariablesN=307Percentage (%)
Female worker status
    Permanent27790.2
    Outsourced278.8
    Contingent31.0
Age
    20-35 years old5919.2
    36-50 years old22272.3
    51-65 years old268.5
Education level
    Elementary School3511.4
    Junior High School12540.4
    Senior High School13443.6
    University134.2
Duration of work
    0-103712.1
    11-2016553.7
    21-309530.9
    31-40103.3
Shift work
    Yes26887.3
    No3912.7
As can be seen in Table 2, all of the respondents reported they had been pregnant while working in the company, but the frequency varies with 46.3% of the respondent having experienced two pregnancies while working. The age at first pregnancy varied: most of the respondent (73.3%) had it between 17-25 years of age while 4.9% had it at the age of <17 years and 1.6% at > 34 years. 45% experienced pregnancy disorders in the form of nausea, vomiting, menstrual issues, and several other problems.
Table 2.

Pregnancy history of female workers.

VariablesTotalPercentage (%)
Pregnancy experiences
    1 time9029.3
    2 times14246.3
    3 times5718.6
    4 times134.2
    5 times51.6
Age of first pregnancy
    <17 years154.9
    17-25 years22573.3
    26-34 years6220.2
    > 34 years51.6
Pregnancy disorders
    Yes13845
    No16955
Pregnancy check-ups
    Specialist5718.6
    Doctor82.6
    Midwife22974.6
    Public Health Center92.9
    Traditional Birth Attendant41.3
Person assisting the delivery process
    Doctor10935.5
    Midwife19061.9
    Traditional Birth Attendant82.6
Place of delivery
    Hospital10935.5
    Maternity hospital3210.4
    Midwife’s house15550.5
    Patient’s house92.9
    Traditional Birth Attendant House20.7
Miscarriage/abortus experiences
    Yes4916
    No25884
Weight of baby
    <2,500 grams185.9
    2,500 grams28994.1
Pregnancy check-ups and antenatal care were routinely conducted: the majority of the visits (74.6%) was carried out by midwives, followed by obstetricians with 18.6%, while only 1.3% consulted Traditional Birth Attendants (TBAs). Moreover, 61.9% of the child delivery process was assisted by midwives, 35.5% by doctors, and 2.6% by TBAs; and the majority (50.5%) was recorded to have happened in the midwife’s house, 35.5% in the hospital, 2.9% in the respondents’ house, and 0.7 at the TBAs. Furthermore, all the babies were found to be generally in good condition with only 5.9% weighing less than 2500 grams. However, 16% of the respondents experienced a miscarriage. Table 3 describes the hazards in the work environment, which include noise, dust, pungent odor, irritant material, vibrations, overload loads, and repetitive works and, according to the simple logistic regression, those affecting pregnancy disorders include vibrations (P = 0.004), irritants (P = 0.002), and repetitive works (P = 0.009).
Table 3.

Hazard in the work environment.

HazardRespondents with pregnancy disordersRespondents without pregnancy disordersP-Value
Noise0.571
    Yes103 (74.6%)127 (75.1%)
    No35 (25.4%)42 (24.9%)
Dust0.605
    Yes98 (71%)116 (68.6%)
    No40 (29%)53 (31.4%)
Odor0.076
    Yes49 (35.5%)49 (29%)
    No89 (64.5%)120 (71%)
Irritant0.002
    Yes42 (30.4%)70 (41.4%)
    No96 (69.9%)99 (58.6%)
Vibration0.004
    Yes75 (54.3%)78 (46.2%)
    No63 (45.7%)91 (53.8%)
Overload load0.650
    Yes17 (12.3%)29 (17.2%)
    No121 (87.7%)140 (82.8%)
Repetitive work0.009
    Yes72 (52.2%)106 (62.7%)
    No66 (47.8%)63 (37.3)
This study aimed to describe the influence of the hazards in the work environment on pregnancy disorders. Most of the female workers studied have been working for more than 10 years, meaning they are more likely to be have been exposed to several hazards[11] with the possibilities of several effects on their health.[12] Moreover, the 1-3-2 work shifts indicate there is an alternation of work duties in the morning, evening, and night each week and this may cause health problems such as sleep and hormonal disorders[13] and also affect the circadian rhythm inside the women’s body, which further leads to irregular menstrual cycles.[14] This means irregular work and night shifts can cause pregnancy problems.[15-17] The age of first pregnancy was considered to be generally good but a small percentage was found to have gotten pregnant at a very young age when the reproductive organs are not anatomically and physiologically ready to function properly, thereby causing several disorders such as miscarriages, babies born with weight less than 2500 grams, and others.[18,19] Socio-demographic characteristic of the respondents (N = 307). Pregnancy history of female workers. The Indonesian government has implemented different policies to improve maternal and child health and protect menstruating, pregnant, and postpartum workers, but these efforts do not consider the fact that the current Maternal Mortality Rate has not yet reached the SDGs target.[20] This has been reported to be caused by inappropriate antenatal care and examination by Traditional Birth Attendant (TBA).[21] However, several efforts have been made by the government to collaborate with midwives and traditional birth attendants to reduce the incidence of maternal mortality[22] but difficulties have been observed in implementing these strategies in remote areas. Furthermore, pregnancy check and childbirth processes are usually conducted in hospitals or midwives houses through the assistance of trained medical personnel, but few people were reported to be still making use of the TBA and this was found to be causing several problems such as miscarriage, bleeding after birth, maternal death, and unhealthy babies.[23] Therefore, there is a need to improve the knowledge of TBAs through training in order to provide adequate assistance to midwives during the birth process. [24]

Some of the working conditions observed to be causing pregnancy disorder include:

WBV (Whole Body Vibration) Whole-Body or Hand-Arm vibration in the workplace has detrimental effects on the health of workers through its effects on several organs and systems such as the reproductive organs,[25] causing health problems and pregnancy disorders. It has been reported to cause abnormal uterus positioning, abnormal menstruation, and abortion[26] and in extreme cases, menstrual disorder, anomalies in foetal position, and stillbirths.[27] Therefore, there is a need for protection and administrative efforts to reduce the impact of WBV on workers, especially the female ones who are very vulnerable to such hazards in the work environment.[28]

Irritant

An irritant is a chemical causing damages to the body directly through inhalation, skin contact, and the digestive tract. It can affect the hormones, which further causes pregnancy disorders in female workers.[29]

Repetitive work

These are works often repeated in the workplace and with the ability to cause psychological and health problems. According to OSHA, any activity conducted repeatedly in less than 30 seconds is categorized as repetitive motion, and any work done permanently and repetitively for 6 hours has effects.[30] Therefore, repetitive work and motion have the ability to increase risks of miscarriage, preterm labor and birth, low birth weight, preeclampsia[31] and directly affect the development of the fetus in the body. Moreover, in a continuous condition, it causes abortion and premature babies[32] and if conducted in a standing position, it is more dangerous due to its ability to cause restriction or symptoms of preterm labor.[33] Therefore, the company is required to pay more attention to the health of female workers in order to avoid several health problems during pregnancy.[34]

Conclusions

Female workers in industrial environments are prone to experience pregnancy disorders. This is associated with the pregnancy check-ups and deliveries conducted by TBAs and the exposure to several hazards in the work environment such as vibrations, irritants, and repetitive works. Therefore, companies are required to focus on reducing the hazards in the work environment to protect female workers from pregnancy disorders. Hazard in the work environment.
  25 in total

1.  Carcinogenicity of shift-work, painting, and fire-fighting.

Authors:  Kurt Straif; Robert Baan; Yann Grosse; Béatrice Secretan; Fatiha El Ghissassi; Véronique Bouvard; Andrea Altieri; Lamia Benbrahim-Tallaa; Vincent Cogliano
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Family planning in sub-Saharan Africa: progress or stagnation?

Authors:  John G Cleland; Robert P Ndugwa; Eliya M Zulu
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 9.408

Review 3.  Occupational reproductive hazards.

Authors:  M Paul
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-05-10       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Despite awareness of recommendations, why do health care workers not immunize pregnant women?

Authors:  Anat Gesser-Edelsburg; Yaffa Shir-Raz; Samah Hayek; Sharon Aassaraf; Lior Lowenstein
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.918

5.  Occupational hand dermatitis among cement workers in Taiwan.

Authors:  Bour-Jr Wang; Jyun-De Wu; Shiann-Cherng Sheu; Tung-Sheng Shih; Ho-Yuan Chang; Yue-Liang Guo; Ying-Jan Wang; Tzu-Chieh Chou
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 6.  Selected health risks caused by long-term, whole-body vibration.

Authors:  H Seidel
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  Antecedents of teenage pregnancy from a 14-year follow-up study using data linkage.

Authors:  Jennifer Gaudie; Francis Mitrou; David Lawrence; Fiona J Stanley; Sven R Silburn; Stephen R Zubrick
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 8.  Impacts of shift work on sleep and circadian rhythms.

Authors:  D B Boivin; P Boudreau
Journal:  Pathol Biol (Paris)       Date:  2014-09-20

9.  Shift work, duration of pregnancy, and birth weight: the National Birth Cohort in Denmark.

Authors:  Jin Liang Zhu; Niels H Hjollund; Jørn Olsen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  Whole-body vibration-related health disorders in occupational medicine--an international comparison.

Authors:  Eckardt Johanning
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 2.778

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.