Literature DB >> 28888527

Complications following harvesting of patellar tendon or hamstring tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Systematic review of literature.

A Hardy1, L Casabianca2, K Andrieu3, L Baverel4, T Noailles3.   

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction can be performed with an autograft, which is most often harvested from the patient's hamstring tendon (HT) or patellar tendon (PT). However, autograft harvesting leads to morbidity that is by no means insignificant. A systematic review of literature was performed to define the incidence of complications related to graft harvesting and the methods to prevent these complications. In March 2017, a systemic review of literature was performed using the keywords"harvesting", "harvest", "morbidity", "complication", "cruciate ligament". No time limit was applied. The studies had to be written in French or English with their abstract available online. This initial search based on the title and abstract identified 133 articles. Two independent observers analyzed each article entirely, including the references. In all, 36 articles were retained. The main complication of HT harvesting was sensory deficit because of damage to the infrapatellar branches of the saphenous nerve. This complication occurred in 39.7% to 88% of patients. This risk can be reduced by using a horizontal or oblique incision. The main complication following PT harvesting is anterior knee pain, reported in up to 46% of patients. There are substantial numbers of short-, medium- and long-term complications related to the harvesting of the two main ACL autografts. Effective means of prevention exist to reduce the risk of these complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II Systematic review of literature.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hamstring; Harvesting site; Nerve complication; Patellar ligament; Patellar tendon; Prevention

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28888527     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  26 in total

1.  Strength of suture-button fixation versus ligament reconstruction in syndesmotic injury: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Hong-Yun Li; Ru-Shou Zhou; Zi-Ying Wu; Yutong Zhao; Shi-Yi Chen; Ying-Hui Hua
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Repair of the medial patellofemoral ligament with suture tape augmentation leads to similar primary contact pressures and joint kinematics like reconstruction with a tendon graft: a biomechanical comparison.

Authors:  Julian Mehl; Alexander Otto; Brendan Comer; Cameron Kia; Franz Liska; Elifho Obopilwe; Knut Beitzel; Andreas B Imhoff; John P Fulkerson; Florian B Imhoff
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Network meta-analysis of knee outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with various types of tendon grafts.

Authors:  Xiong-Gang Yang; Feng Wang; Xin He; Jiang-Tao Feng; Yong-Cheng Hu; Hao Zhang; Li Yang; Kunchi Hua
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  In situ cross-sectional area of the quadriceps tendon using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging significantly correlates with the intraoperative diameter of the quadriceps tendon autograft.

Authors:  Satoshi Takeuchi; Benjamin B Rothrauff; Masashi Taguchi; Ryo Kanto; Kentaro Onishi; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  A brief history of tendon and ligament bioreactors: Impact and future prospects.

Authors:  Nathaniel A Dyment; Jennifer G Barrett; Hani A Awad; Catherine A Bautista; Albert J Banes; David L Butler
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Complications and technical failures are rare in knee ligament reconstruction: analyses based on 31,326 reconstructions during 10 years in Denmark.

Authors:  Daniel Rayan Kalakech Munch; Thomas Irgens Hansen; Kim Lyngby Mikkelsen; Michael Rindom Krogsgaard
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Outcomes Following ACL Reconstruction Based on Graft Type: Are all Grafts Equivalent?

Authors:  Matthew Widner; Mark Dunleavy; Scott Lynch
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2019-12

8.  ACL surgical trends evolve in the last five years for young European surgeons: results of the survey among the U45 ESSKA members.

Authors:  S Cerciello; M Ollivier; B Kocaoglu; R S Khakha; R Seil
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Bone filling decreases donor site morbidity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts.

Authors:  Ittai Shichman; David Baruchi; Gil Rachevsky; Nissan Amzallag; Addy S Brandstetter; Matias Vidra; Guy Morag
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 2.928

10.  Accelerated Versus Non-accelerated Rehabilitation After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autografts: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.

Authors:  Sang-Gyun Kim; Dae Hee Lee; Jae Gyoon Kim; Won Seok Kim
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.