Literature DB >> 30467581

Complications and technical failures are rare in knee ligament reconstruction: analyses based on 31,326 reconstructions during 10 years in Denmark.

Daniel Rayan Kalakech Munch1, Thomas Irgens Hansen1, Kim Lyngby Mikkelsen2, Michael Rindom Krogsgaard3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Knowledge about treatment injuries (technical failures and complications) in relation to knee ligament reconstructions is sparse. Our purpose was to describe treatment injuries to knee ligament reconstruction in Denmark during a 10-year period and to suggest initiatives to reduce the risk for treatment injuries.
METHODS: Treatment injuries after knee ligament reconstructions reported to the Danish Patient Compensation Association (DPCA) 2005-2014 were analyzed and compared to information from the Danish Kneeligament Reconstruction Register and Danish National Patient Register.
RESULTS: The number of knee ligament reconstructions in Denmark 2005-2014, including revisions, was 31,326. Of the 704 cases claimed to DPCA, 371 were approved as treatment injuries (1.42% of all operations). Tunnel malpositioning (135 = 0.43% of all operations), deep infection (0.27%), nerve injury (0.17%), pain (0.12%) and unrecognized combined instability (0.11%) were the most common. Patients operated with anteromedial technique for femoral tunnel placement had a lower incidence (p < 0.0001) of tunnel malpositioning compared to other techniques. Public and private hospitals had the same risk of treatment injures. Hospitals that performed the largest number of reconstructions/year had the smallest risk of a treatment injury (p < 0.001). The total compensation was 7.6 m EURO, which equals 243 EURO/performed knee ligament reconstruction.
CONCLUSION: Treatment injuries as defined in this study were rare, with tunnel malpositioning being the most common. Analyses of the results indicate that it may be clinically relevant to reduce the number of treatment injures that knee ligament reconstructions are concentrated in clinics with high volume. Also, malpositioning might be reduced by routine documentation of K-wire position before tunnels are drilled. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Economic compensation; Epidemiology; Knee ligament reconstruction; Technical failures

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30467581     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5297-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  20 in total

1.  Complications following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the English NHS.

Authors:  Simon S Jameson; Daniel Dowen; Philip James; Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza; Mike R Reed; David Deehan
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Relationship between different skin incisions and the injury of the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Hao Luo; Jia-kuo Yu; Ying-fang Ao; Chang-long Yu; Li-Bin Peng; Chun-yang Lin; Ji-ying Zhang; Xin Fu
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Prevalence of saphenous nerve injury after autogenous hamstring harvest: an anatomic and clinical study of sartorial branch injury.

Authors:  Brett Sanders; Robert Rolf; Walter McClelland; John Xerogeanes
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Medium to long-term follow-up after ACL revision.

Authors:  Martin Lind; Bent Lund; Peter Faunø; Sinan Said; Lene Lindberg Miller; Svend Erik Christiansen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Infections following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Daniel Judd; Craig Bottoni; David Kim; Matthew Burke; Shawn Hooker
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Injury to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve in ACL reconstruction with the hamstrings technique: clinical and electrophysiological study.

Authors:  D Figueroa; R Calvo; A Vaisman; M Campero; C Moraga
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Sensibility loss after ACL reconstruction with hamstring graft.

Authors:  J Kjaergaard; L Z Faunø; P Faunø
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.118

8.  Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: trends, readmissions, and subsequent knee surgery.

Authors:  Stephen Lyman; Panagiotis Koulouvaris; Seth Sherman; Huong Do; Lisa A Mandl; Robert G Marx
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Effect of graft selection on the incidence of postoperative infection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Joseph U Barker; Mark C Drakos; Travis G Maak; Russell F Warren; Riley J Williams; Answorth A Allen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Septic arthritis after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective analysis of incidence, presentation, treatment, and cause.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Yingfang Ao; Jianquan Wang; Yuelin Hu; Guoqing Cui; Jiakuo Yu
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  1 in total

1.  Compensation claims following anterior cruciate ligament injuries reported to the patient insurance company in Sweden in 2005-2014.

Authors:  Osama Omar; Dzan Rizvanovic; Markus Waldén; Karl Eriksson; Björn Barenius; Anders Stålman
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.717

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.