Literature DB >> 26686914

Intrauterine device placement at 3 versus 6 weeks postpartum: a randomized trial.

Maureen K Baldwin1, Alison B Edelman2, Jeong Y Lim2, Mark D Nichols2, Paula H Bednarek2, Jeffrey T Jensen2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether early placement of an intrauterine device (IUD) at 3 weeks after delivery, compared to placement at 6 weeks, is associated with greater use at 3 months postpartum. STUDY
DESIGN: This prospective randomized, controlled trial enrolled inpatient postpartum women intending to use intrauterine contraception. Participants were assigned to an early (3 week) or standard (6 week) postpartum visit with IUD placement and were followed for 6 months. We used transvaginal ultrasonography to confirm placement and measure uterine dimensions. We measured pain with IUD insertion and satisfaction with IUD timing using 100-mm visual analog scales. Data were analyzed based on randomization and actual timing of insertion (18-24 vs. 39-45 days).
RESULTS: Between February 2012 and December 2013, 201 subjects were enrolled (early=101; standard=100). Most participants returned for IUD placement as scheduled; 70.1% (53/75) in the early group, 74.3% (58/78) in the standard group (p=.06). IUD use did not differ between groups at 3 months (73/100, 73.0% and 73/97, 75.3%, respectively, p=.72) or 6 months (80.3% and 82.8%, p=.71) amongst those women for whom follow-up was available. Women randomized to 6-week insertion were more likely to have resumed intercourse prior to the IUD appointment (15/64, 23.4% vs. 5/68, 7.3%, p=.01). Pain with insertion (19.9 vs. 25.1, respectively, p=.21) and satisfaction (89.6 vs. 93.4, respectively, p=.23) did not vary based on actual timing of insertion.
CONCLUSION: Offering IUD placement at 3 weeks postpartum compared to standard scheduling at 6 weeks does not result in increased use at 3 months. However, early IUD placement is acceptable to women and without increased pain. IMPLICATIONS: This study demonstrates that IUD placement as early as 3 weeks postpartum is feasible. Larger studies are needed to evaluate risks and benefits of IUD placement at this early interval. While earlier timing does not result in increased IUD uptake, early placement should be explored as an option since many women resume intercourse before 6 weeks.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; Insertion timing; Intrauterine device; Postpartum; Uptake

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26686914     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  6 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to prevent or treat heavy menstrual bleeding or pain associated with intrauterine-device use.

Authors:  Karen Christelle; Mohd N Norhayati; Sharifah Halimah Jaafar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-26

2.  Predictors for follow-up among postpartum patients enrolled in a clinical trial.

Authors:  Maureen K Baldwin; Kyle D Hart; Maria I Rodriguez
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Comparison of an additional early visit to routine postpartum care on initiation of long-acting reversible contraception: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Caitlin Bernard; Leping Wan; Jeffrey F Peipert; Tessa Madden
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Initiation With a 2- to 3-Week Compared With a 6-Week Postpartum Visit.

Authors:  Melissa J Chen; Melody Y Hou; Jennifer K Hsia; Catherine D Cansino; Juliana Melo; Mitchell D Creinin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Expulsion of intrauterine devices after postpartum placement by timing of placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah H Averbach; Yokabed Ermias; Gary Jeng; Kathryn M Curtis; Maura K Whiteman; Erin Berry-Bibee; Denise J Jamieson; Polly A Marchbanks; Naomi K Tepper; Tara C Jatlaoui
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Intrauterine Device Expulsion After Postpartum Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Maura K Whiteman; Gary Jeng; Naomi K Tepper; Erin Berry-Bibee; Denise J Jamieson; Polly A Marchbanks; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.661

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.